Connect and get the inside scoop on Airline Companies

Welcome to Airline Pilot Forums - Connect and get the inside scoop on Airline Companies

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ. Join our community today and start interacting with existing members. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free.


User Tag List

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-30-2010, 06:59 AM   #11  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 29,859
Exclamation

I would be strongly opposed to eliminating the title Regional from these forums. The forum structure is designed to be user friendly and easy to navigate (we hope), not to make a political statement.

Newcomers would be very confused.

I don't really have an issue with adding the word "Contract"..ie "Regional/Contract Airlines" but this could cause confusion too..we would get people interested in contract flying jobs for foreign airlines.

The industry term is "Regional"...how it evolved is not too important but we are not going to be able change it unilaterally. You guys think RAA is going to change their name to "CAA"?

"Fee-For-Departure" airlines might be a little clearer, but even that term is becoming less relevant as contract terms evolve into more risk-sharing.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 05-30-2010, 08:16 AM   #12  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
winglet's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 466
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
I would be strongly opposed to eliminating the title Regional from these forums. The forum structure is designed to be user friendly and easy to navigate (we hope), not to make a political statement.

Newcomers would be very confused.

I don't really have an issue with adding the word "Contract"..ie "Regional/Contract Airlines" but this could cause confusion too..we would get people interested in contract flying jobs for foreign airlines.

The industry term is "Regional"...how it evolved is not too important but we are not going to be able change it unilaterally. You guys think RAA is going to change their name to "CAA"?

"Fee-For-Departure" airlines might be a little clearer, but even that term is becoming less relevant as contract terms evolve into more risk-sharing.

rickair7777,

As others have said, the term is inaccurate, misleading and has already been politicized by airline managements and industry advocacy groups. I challenge you to de-politicize this type of flying by using a more adequate term.

By calling the outsourced flying that represents more that 50% of domestic flying "regional" is a damaging misnomer. Since "Mainline" is now "feeding" the outsourced airlines, maybe a revision of terminology is in order. "Mainline" pilots and outsourced/scoped/contract pilots would primarily agree that the nomenclature needs to be revised. This "R" word needs to go away along with the other terms mentioned previously (commuter, feeder, etc). Many of these airlines have aircraft up to 86 seats and cover the Arctic to the Tropics. The term does a disservice to the industry, the public and the media. People need to know what company is operating the aircraft they are purchasing a ticket on.

I'll agree that "contract" flying may be confusing to some but not nearly as misleading and confusing as the current term. "Fee for Departure" won't work because not all of these types of companies operate on the disappearing fee-for-departure contracts.

Whenever I hear the word, I mention that it is a misnomer. If enough of us let people know the facts, we can eventually persuade others not to use it either. Let's brainstorm and come up with a term that accurately describes the type of flying that this sector represents. How about seat-scoped airlines, or outsourced airlines, etc?

Like the Government said, "Regionals are the Mainline". Since outsourced airlines are the ones being fed, just change this forum title to Domestic Mainline and the Mainline forum to Domestic Mainline Feeders .

winglet

Last edited by winglet; 05-30-2010 at 01:57 PM.
winglet is offline  
Old 05-30-2010, 08:20 AM   #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lighteningspeed's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: G550 Captain
Posts: 1,205
Default

I don't think it makes any difference what people call regional airlines. I think the label major airlines should be reserved for mainline airlines that sells their own tickets on their own routes. It's absurd calling CHQ or SkyWest a major airlines for neither one of them sells their own branded flying.

It doesn't matter what we pilots call regional airlines. What matters is how can we make mainline management take back all flying regardless of size, or route length and make all pilots under one company seniority list and pay same payrates and benefits.
Lighteningspeed is offline  
Old 05-30-2010, 08:30 AM   #14  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
winglet's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 466
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lighteningspeed View Post
I don't think it makes any difference what people call regional airlines. I think the label major airlines should be reserved for mainline airlines that sells their own tickets on their own routes. It's absurd calling CHQ or SkyWest a major airlines for neither one of them sells their own branded flying...It doesn't matter what we pilots call regional airlines.
Lighteningspeed,

Don't underestimate the enormous power of words. It's not by accident that the term "regional" was suddenly applied to the outsourced airlines at the same time the scope-relaxation campaign began.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lighteningspeed View Post
What matters is how can we make mainline management take back all flying regardless of size, or route length and make all pilots under one company seniority list and pay same payrates and benefits.
I totally agree and it begins with using the correct terminology to illiminate the manufactured confusion.

winglet
winglet is offline  
Old 05-30-2010, 09:32 AM   #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
strfyr51's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Position: A320/A319/B737 Sys Acft Maint Controller
Posts: 303
Default

Mainline management isn't going to take back ANYTHING! It's the Airline PILOTS Who will have to REFUSE to extend further "courtesies".. THAT GENIE IS OUT OF THE BOTTLE NOW and THE only WAY IT CAN GROW BIGGER if for the next "Trick in the book"!! An Airline like a Skywest will have to Buy into a Major chunk of a United, American or a Delta for the "Right" to fly under their Colors with the Major Airline dictating the Criteria under which Pilots are Hired and deployed even down to the Uniforms and cockpit Equipment.. Once that entity is formed and ALL the scope pay is worked out with flow through proceedures in the manner that a player comes from Triple A ball to the Majors. Then all the "lesser" player Regionals might have to find a "niche" or fade away.. Or?? The "REGIONALS" might again have to return to Branded Flying in the Days of Air Wisconsin, Mississippi Valley, Golden Gate, Golden West, Ransome, Provincetown Boston, Henson, Aspen, Rocky Mountain, Boise Cascade etc. They connected With the majors but they weren't getting the fuel bill paid for them so they Had to be "complete" airlines, Not just a Limo/Taxi Service with wings. They Owned and published their routes and schedules. They managed their way to Success or Failure. And when I worked for one, (Golden Gate) their Pilots walked with pride because they weren't bound by any scope clause They were independent operators with interline agreements.
strfyr51 is offline  
Old 05-30-2010, 12:15 PM   #16  
ULTP-Ultra Low Tier Pilot
 
The Juice's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,227
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
I would be strongly opposed to eliminating the title Regional from these forums. The forum structure is designed to be user friendly and easy to navigate (we hope), not to make a political statement.

Newcomers would be very confused.
The newcomers need to learn the reality of this profession from day one.

Just as APC tries to enlighten new pilots/pilot hopefuls on the ways of being a "real life" airline pilot, they need to know this as well. They need to know that there are few regionals left and the disticntion of regional/major/mainline is becoming more blured by the second.
The Juice is offline  
Old 05-30-2010, 01:00 PM   #17  
Property of Scheduling
 
higney85's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,282
Default

Newcomers better recognize..... We are contract carriers. Flying all across the US and canada/mexico (as many REGIONALS do), is not REGIONAL flying.
higney85 is offline  
Old 05-30-2010, 02:39 PM   #18  
Are we there yet??!!
 
Thedude's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,984
Default

Quote:

Don't underestimate the enormous power of words. It's not by accident that the term "regional" was suddenly applied to the outsourced airlines at the same time the scope-relaxation campaign began.
The term regional started about the same time the RJ was introduced. I can remember being corrected by XJet employees (that used to be called Co Ex). It "regional" and not commuter now. I happen to be working for a commuter at the time and we sold out own tickets, had our own routes and even had a code share on two of the routes.


Quote:
I totally agree and it begins with using the correct terminology to illuminate the manufactured confusion.
Lets be a little more accurate.

Its now contracted small lift providers.

Does that make you happy winglet?
Thedude is offline  
Old 05-30-2010, 03:04 PM   #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
stoki's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: bar stool
Posts: 736
Default

Lots of points here. Seems that term has been used as an excuse to give subpar wages and contracts for years now... the "regionals" have grown out of being regional.
stoki is offline  
Old 05-30-2010, 03:31 PM   #20  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: Furlough/Gun Driver
Posts: 425
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stoki View Post
Lots of points here. Seems that term has been used as an excuse to give subpar wages and contracts for years now... the "regionals" have grown out of being regional.
Sounds like regionals need to start demanding mainline wages. When regionals can no longer afford to fly for the majors and shutdown, the majors will have to do more of thier own flying. More jobs at the majors for regional pilots to move to so they can make reasonable wages flying those 70 and 90 seat jets.
dosbo is offline  
 
 
 

 
Post Reply
 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Regional Airlines Get Wings Clipped by Big Pa fxn2fly Regional 40 01-01-2010 04:59 AM
WSJ article on Airline safety MD80 Major 1 12-04-2009 08:04 AM
FAA's increased regional oversight stratoduck Regional 6 06-26-2009 09:46 AM
take off and landing currency part 121 USMC3197 Aviation Law 15 09-25-2008 06:11 PM
FDX - Airlines Balk at Indy Hub Bill DLax85 Cargo 3 08-30-2008 07:00 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:48 PM.