F9/rah Sli?
08-09-2010 | 02:03 PM
#101
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
From: E-170
the FA union and the pilot union at RAH are two very different organazations that are totally unrelated to each other. Saying that it is the same union is like saying the Mesa MEC and Delta ALPA are the same union.
08-10-2010 | 08:58 AM
#102
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
additionally, if you read the results of the F/A NMB filing you will see that many of the details identified to NOT make a single carrier no longer aplly at RAH. More consolidation of people and positions have occured making things more "singular" if you will. a single carrier filing now would more probably be approved...
08-11-2010 | 05:31 AM
#103
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Pilots - IBT
FA's Legal Representation - Baptiste and Wilder
Pilots Legal Representation - Baptiste and Wilder
FA's Attorney - William Wilder
FA's Attorney - William Wilder
Attorney that submitted the SC petition with the NMB - W Wilder
Attorney that submitted that all YX FA's should automatically become IBT - W Wilder
Attorney that submitted that A-M and M-B no longer apply when it became apparent that the IBT would not capture all of the RAH FA's- W Wilder
Attorney that is representing the IBT Pilots - W Wilder
Attorney that will eventually submit the SC Petition again - W Wilder
Different Locals? Yes
Totally unrelated? I respectfully disagree
08-11-2010 | 05:45 AM
#104
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
additionally, if you read the results of the F/A NMB filing you will see that many of the details identified to NOT make a single carrier no longer aplly at RAH. More consolidation of people and positions have occured making things more "singular" if you will. a single carrier filing now would more probably be approved...
Additionally, with airplanes painted in different colors, UAL, DAL, USA, AA, F9, the NMB would have to contradict previous decisions to grant RAH single carrier.
There are also a number of operational differences that need to removed prior to any decision. It may happen in the future, but it is more than likely distant.
08-11-2010 | 12:11 PM
#105
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Until Chq, shuttle and republic starts to sell there own tickets, you are going to have a hard time establishing single carrier.
Additionally, with airplanes painted in different colors, UAL, DAL, USA, AA, F9, the NMB would have to contradict previous decisions to grant RAH single carrier.
There are also a number of operational differences that need to removed prior to any decision. It may happen in the future, but it is more than likely distant.
Additionally, with airplanes painted in different colors, UAL, DAL, USA, AA, F9, the NMB would have to contradict previous decisions to grant RAH single carrier.
There are also a number of operational differences that need to removed prior to any decision. It may happen in the future, but it is more than likely distant.
http://www.nmb.gov/representation/deter2010/37n032.pdf
Last edited by sizzlechest; 08-11-2010 at 12:40 PM. Reason: added link
08-11-2010 | 02:49 PM
#106
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
There are numerous decisions by the nmb that include marketing and livery as a component of the nmb's decision.
There is a two part test conducted by the NMB. Hensens declaration to the nmb during the last petition only cited MWA(republic airlines), because that is the only carrier out of all the rah carriers that passes the first part of the test.
Anything can and probably will happen. If it was just republic and frontier it would be a done deal. I don't see how you can include the fixed fee operators that are not marketed and do not sell tickets. We will see soon enough, prob by the end of the year.
There is a two part test conducted by the NMB. Hensens declaration to the nmb during the last petition only cited MWA(republic airlines), because that is the only carrier out of all the rah carriers that passes the first part of the test.
Anything can and probably will happen. If it was just republic and frontier it would be a done deal. I don't see how you can include the fixed fee operators that are not marketed and do not sell tickets. We will see soon enough, prob by the end of the year.
08-11-2010 | 04:06 PM
#107
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
From: E-170
There are numerous decisions by the nmb that include marketing and livery as a component of the nmb's decision.
There is a two part test conducted by the NMB. Hensens declaration to the nmb during the last petition only cited MWA(republic airlines), because that is the only carrier out of all the rah carriers that passes the first part of the test.
Anything can and probably will happen. If it was just republic and frontier it would be a done deal. I don't see how you can include the fixed fee operators that are not marketed and do not sell tickets. We will see soon enough, prob by the end of the year.
There is a two part test conducted by the NMB. Hensens declaration to the nmb during the last petition only cited MWA(republic airlines), because that is the only carrier out of all the rah carriers that passes the first part of the test.
Anything can and probably will happen. If it was just republic and frontier it would be a done deal. I don't see how you can include the fixed fee operators that are not marketed and do not sell tickets. We will see soon enough, prob by the end of the year.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
