Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
SKW/XJT/ASA fleet bases, merger concerns >

SKW/XJT/ASA fleet bases, merger concerns

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

SKW/XJT/ASA fleet bases, merger concerns

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-20-2010 | 03:01 PM
  #91  
Slaphappy's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by mking84
TSA, GO Jet, Compass

Mesa and Freedumb



XJT does not want anything to do with scenarios like those created at those two companies. Whether it happens or not is irrelevant, I think we can all agree that one list and scope language that means something at the regional level is very important.
Its being honored with merger of xjt and asa since asa is buying xjt. Skywest has no connection in this what so ever and It won't hold up in court. Berkshire Hathaway is a perfect example, they own many other companies that buy and sell other companies under them. This is no different, the precedent has been set and a judge will look at it.

Mesa and Freedom were different than this as well as Tsa and gojet. Skywest has been around the longest and hasn’t been used to whipsaw anyone.
Reply
Old 08-20-2010 | 03:05 PM
  #92  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by Slaphappy
Its being honored with merger of xjt and asa since asa is buying xjt. Skywest has no connection in this what so ever and It won't hold up in court. Berkshire Hathaway is a perfect example, they own many other companies that buy and sell other companies under them. This is no different, the precedent has been set and a judge will look at it.

Mesa and Freedom were different than this as well as Tsa and gojet. Skywest has been around the longest and hasn’t been used to whipsaw anyone.
Skywest has no connection in this what so ever...

Skywest...hasn't been used to whipsaw anyone.

Just to let you know, saying this enough times doesn't make it true. Just saying...
Reply
Old 08-20-2010 | 03:10 PM
  #93  
Slaphappy's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
Skywest has no connection in this what so ever...

Skywest...hasn't been used to whipsaw anyone.

Just to let you know, saying this enough times doesn't make it true. Just saying...
I asked you before when skywest whipsawed anyone and you have yet to answer just the usual alpo talking points. Yet asa has grown more since the buyout than skywest has.
Reply
Old 08-20-2010 | 05:38 PM
  #94  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by Slaphappy
I asked you before when skywest whipsawed anyone and you have yet to answer just the usual alpo talking points. Yet asa has grown more since the buyout than skywest has.
Well, I've pointed it out numerous times but I will quote an ASA pilot who explains it better than I.

"When we (ASA) were in negotiations, they dangled 15 CR9's to make us sign a concessionary contract. This was about Feb of 2006. When the union wouldn't bite, less than two weeks after the memo announcing the aircraft, they told us SKW would be getting all of them. We bit our lips and held fast. SKW did get those aircraft. Some discussion over whether we were ever really going to get them to begin with. But all they had to do was change the registrations, and they did.

Later, they threatened us with the infamous option 4 which was they would transfer all our aircraft to SKW and we would disappear. They actually did start this. When we closed SLC, they were slated to keep 13 of our CR7's. Due to costs, down time associated with transferring the mx program from one certificate to the other, they only kept 3.
"

And now I'll repost what I've already posted earlier.

Anyways, XJT has already been whipsawd by CAL with the helps of JA. That is why we were decimated. CAL told our CEO to either give them the cpa SKW had negotiated or get the 12 months notice. The cpa SKW negotiated with CAL not only included synergy cost savings but also took into consideration a 16% paycut JA wanted to give us in order to bring us into parity with SKW pilot compensation so that we can be cost competative when CAL put all 205 A/C up for bid again in 12 months. JA said himself his intention was to put up three bids for those 205 A/C. One from XJT, one from ASA, and one from SKW...but it was up to us if we wanted to be cost competitive. That on top of the fact that he was planning on taking 35 of XJT A/C and transferring them to SKW for their pilots to fly while furloughing 700 of ours and giving them preferential interviews at SKW.
Reply
Old 08-20-2010 | 05:48 PM
  #95  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Slaphappy
I asked you before when skywest whipsawed anyone and you have yet to answer just the usual alpo talking points. Yet asa has grown more since the buyout than skywest has.
The answer was provided, but you ignored it:

Originally Posted by Slaphappy
The whole “skywest will be used to whipsaw asa/xjt” argument is false. History has shown since skywest has owned ASA there has been no whipsaw what so ever
Why not start with the first CRJ 900s Skywest, Inc was allocated from Delta. Those were originally slated for ASA when Skywest, Inc made the purchase. Jerry told our pilot group point blank that if we did not give in on instructor pay he would award them to Skywest Airlines instead. We didn't give in and we didn't get the 900s. Is that not whipsaw?

While we voted on and got PBS, there was always the threat that if we did not reduce our costs compared to other pilot groups, we would not grow. Skywest Airlines has one of the lowest cost pilot groups out there and you can bet that Skywest, Inc is not going to miss out on an opportunity to grow!

What about health care? While I'm a fan of HSAs, they aren't for everyone and Skywest Inc will really push hard for a change in the next contract pointing to the fact that you did not have a choice.

That's three good examples without really having to think about it!!

Originally Posted by Slaphappy
If there had been one then ASA would not have gotten UAL flying, 10 900s, 4 700s from horizon and 13 700s from comair. Skywest airlines has only gotten 18 700s as replacements for bros and 15 200s for the failed Midwest contract.
ASA hasn't gained any aircraft from this - Skywest, Inc is simply being business savvy and making good deals to utilize existing assets. If you factor in the ATRs that ASA lost, we're at a net of 8 airplanes by your numbers! Over the same time period, Skywest was allocated 25 700s and 900s that Delta had originally allocated for ASA.

Again, I think you have a very skewed view of whipsaw. It's a lot easier to say there's no such thing when you are the tool being used.
Reply
Old 08-20-2010 | 07:00 PM
  #96  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: emb-145 ca
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
ALPA legal is already paid for through our dues. Maybe he meant that "we" may have to pay for some of it through the MECs SMRA account.
They can just raid the MEC's LVBT/MLD account.

That's the "Las Vegas Bar Tab/Midget Lap Dance" account. I'm sure there's plenty of funds available there.
Reply
Old 08-21-2010 | 05:46 AM
  #97  
Captain Tony's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
ALPA legal is already paid for through our dues. Maybe he meant that "we" may have to pay for some of it through the MECs SMRA account.
ALPA's rules prohibit using union attorneys or union funds for a merger. Too easy for the union to get sued if you don't like the result. If you want a lawyer, you have to hire one and pass an assessment among your pilot group to pay for it.

ASA MEC has retained the firm that handled the NWA merger for Delta.
Reply
Old 08-21-2010 | 05:49 AM
  #98  
Captain Tony's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CaptainNameless
They can just raid the MEC's LVBT/MLD account.

That's the "Las Vegas Bar Tab/Midget Lap Dance" account. I'm sure there's plenty of funds available there.
The midget leprechaun on the bar was a real class act...
Reply
Old 08-21-2010 | 05:51 AM
  #99  
Captain Tony's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Default

And speaking of Vegas, my sources tell me a sit down was had yesterday between the ALPA chairmen, Brad Holt, and Jerry Atkin in LAS to discuss this issue.

What would happen if Jerry threw in the towel and agreed to a three way, but with concessions in return? Hmmm.
Reply
Old 08-21-2010 | 06:14 AM
  #100  
SuperPilotJesse's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 836
Likes: 0
From: EX - OHJFKCRJFO
Default

Originally Posted by Slaphappy
I asked you before when skywest whipsawed anyone and you have yet to answer just the usual alpo talking points. Yet asa has grown more since the buyout than skywest has.
Dang, everyone has pointed out several examples and you still don't
Understand that Skywest has, indeed, whipsawed ASA v Skywest?
Maybe you should learn a little history
Before you talk of things you know nothing about.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
newKnow
Mergers and Acquisitions
20
10-30-2008 09:01 AM
sailingfun
Mergers and Acquisitions
28
10-29-2008 06:38 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices