SKW/XJT/ASA fleet bases, merger concerns
#51
#52
Based on what? Precedent at legacy carriers? Regionals are a whole different ball game. You must consider time to upgrade, base choice and commuting. Most regional pilots still plan to move on. Most legacy carriers are at their destination. At the legacy, they can trade a number for long term career expectations. As a regional you're there for the short term and your number on the list determines when you can upgrade, get your pic time and move on. So it doesn't matter if your % stays the same if 300 pilots hired into the industry after you get to upgrade before you.
HOW'D THAT WORK OUT FOR US AIR AGAIN?!!!! Last I checked, they reversed Nic and won. Not to mention dumping ALPO. Duh.
HOW'D THAT WORK OUT FOR US AIR AGAIN?!!!! Last I checked, they reversed Nic and won. Not to mention dumping ALPO. Duh.
[edit:delete flamebait / insult] First of all it doesn't matter what you or I want. It's called ALPA merger policy, you don't get to chose the method, you vote on the result, and if that doesn't work then an arbitrator will determine the outcome using....that's right you said it....ALPA merger policy, which post US-AWA fiasco, now includes everything in the mix as to not benefit one group significantly more than the other.
If you would like I can post the merger policy for you. By the way, in order to produce an awful result like what the US east pilots did, you'd need a majority...[edit:delete flamebait / insult]
Last edited by TonyWilliams; 08-17-2010 at 03:49 PM.
#53
Line Holder
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
[edit:delete quoted flamebait / insult]
The US Airways thing was unique, over 1/2 the pilots at US Airways were on furlough, a number larger than total pilots at AWA as I remember, so what did they expect to happen when they stapled that many pilots, many with 14-15 years of seniority, below AWA new hires with 1-2 years sen. When all those guys got recalled they conducted a revolution and ditched ALPA, that is not going to happen here, nothing like that is even close to happening here.
The US Airways thing was unique, over 1/2 the pilots at US Airways were on furlough, a number larger than total pilots at AWA as I remember, so what did they expect to happen when they stapled that many pilots, many with 14-15 years of seniority, below AWA new hires with 1-2 years sen. When all those guys got recalled they conducted a revolution and ditched ALPA, that is not going to happen here, nothing like that is even close to happening here.
Last edited by TonyWilliams; 08-17-2010 at 03:50 PM.
#54
Moderator
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Based on what? Precedent at legacy carriers? Regionals are a whole different ball game. You must consider time to upgrade, base choice and commuting. Most regional pilots still plan to move on. Most legacy carriers are at their destination. At the legacy, they can trade a number for long term career expectations. As a regional you're there for the short term and your number on the list determines when you can upgrade, get your pic time and move on. So it doesn't matter if your % stays the same if 300 pilots hired into the industry after you get to upgrade before you.
HOW'D THAT WORK OUT FOR US AIR AGAIN?!!!! Last I checked, they reversed Nic and won. Not to mention dumping ALPO. Duh.
HOW'D THAT WORK OUT FOR US AIR AGAIN?!!!! Last I checked, they reversed Nic and won. Not to mention dumping ALPO. Duh.
Secondly, why don't you show me the single seniority list for UsAir/America West? The only one I know of is the Nicolau Award. That is still the controlling list, & it was not thrown out. The only thing that USAPA has gotten it's pilots is millions of more $$$ in fees, & years of wasted time/lost wages due to selfishly fighting the binding arbitration they agreed to. They are costing their own pilots millions of $$$, keeping them on separate contracts, & continuing their pilots BK wages. It seems like a good move so far.
#55
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
From: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
The US Airways thing was unique, over 1/2 the pilots at US Airways were on furlough, a number larger than total pilots at AWA as I remember, so what did they expect to happen when they stapled that many pilots, many with 14-15 years of seniority, below AWA new hires with 1-2 years sen. When all those guys got recalled they conducted a revolution and ditched ALPA, that is not going to happen here, nothing like that is even close to happening here.
You're forgetting, it's ALSO unique because it was BEFORE McCaskill.
Last edited by dojetdriver; 08-17-2010 at 03:41 PM.
#56
If an integration based on DOH didn't benefit you personally, would you still claim it was so likely to happen?
#57
Yes. I firmly believe it's the only fair way for a regional merger. And there isn't a whole lot of precedent for a regional merger of this size, now is there? The ALPA template isn't going to work this time.
#58
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: Piloto
Figure of speach Commander Tony. Upgrade time is going to be long without growth regardless of how the list is merged.
#60
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: emb-145 ca
May take a few years but upgrading is going to matter less and less in the future anyway. Good to have it, but not a show-stopper if you don't. Too much may even hurt your chances if you want to go to a major in the future. They don't want new FOs who think they know how to be a captain better than the captain.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
newKnow
Mergers and Acquisitions
20
10-30-2008 09:01 AM



