Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Will 100 seat aircraft come to the regionals? >

Will 100 seat aircraft come to the regionals?

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines
View Poll Results: What will the regionals be flying in 5 years
Scope will go back to 50 seats or less
38
16.67%
Scope will allow more 76 jets but stay at 76 seats
94
41.23%
Scope will allow 100 Seats or less
60
26.32%
Scope will allow 125 seats or less
36
15.79%
Voters: 228. You may not vote on this poll

Will 100 seat aircraft come to the regionals?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-16-2010 | 05:25 PM
  #11  
BoilerUP's Avatar
Doing One Pilot's Job
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,889
Likes: 129
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
I think what most people don't understand is that there is NO 100 seat aircraft available except for the E190, and most airlines are not impressed with the product.
JetBlue seems fairly impressed with the E190...so does Republic. Delta also seems fairly happy with the E175s they have flying around between Compass & Shuttle...or are they not?

Also, the C-Series is what, 3-4 years out (allegedly)? Still plenty of time for an airline to to evaluate markets and get an order in for some early delivery positions.

As to the OP's question...I sure hope not.
Reply
Old 08-16-2010 | 05:52 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: A320
Default

The question should be: Are there going to be any OTHER 100 seat airplanes at the regionals? Republic currently flies a 100-1 seat and is a regional.
Reply
Old 08-16-2010 | 08:47 PM
  #13  
TonyWilliams's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,048
Likes: 0
From: Self employed
Default

The current news is ripe with code shares far in excess of 100 seat jets. Code share will be the new "regional" contract, or any other scheme that gets around scope and puts super cheap pilots in the biggest plane possible.

Too many pilots are the common denominator to low salaries. If the salaries went up, the contracting out issue (by whatever method) will be mitigated. Salaries will only go up when there is a bona fide shortage of pilots who will work for $20/hour.

Quite regularly, there's a post on these forums proclaiming, "I don't care how bad the pay/conditions are, I want to fly for a living", and I'm not convinced that the 1500/ATP rule will have a significant impact overall.
Reply
Old 08-16-2010 | 09:08 PM
  #14  
TonyWilliams's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,048
Likes: 0
From: Self employed
Default

Originally Posted by EMBFlyer
84...and Air Wisconsin is still the only carrier that can fly that within UAL Scope. I also think that it's certain tail numbers.

And Mesa is currently operating 88 seats for HP/US ?
Reply
Old 08-16-2010 | 09:45 PM
  #15  
Rock752000's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: CL-65 R, L, R... R.
Default

Originally Posted by TonyWilliams
And Mesa is currently operating 88 seats for HP/US ?
86 seats to be exact.
Reply
Old 08-17-2010 | 02:47 AM
  #16  
saab2000's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,755
Likes: 6
Default

It is also worth noting that the BAe-146 that AWAC operated had a much, much higher payscale than most of the larger ones have today. It was a special operation which was tolerated by the United pilots because it was a small fleet (18 at its maximum), operated in and out of a few places they couldn't easily do (ASE and SBA) without bringing that equipment into their fleet.

IIRC, the top payscale was something around $140/hour before the concessionary contract went into effect. And there were a lot at that figure. It was not some unreachable number as AWAC had always been a company with high longevity.

It was a unique situation and not really comparable to the Mesa and Republic 86-seaters which are operated in far, far larger numbers to destinations US Airways pilots could easily do.
Reply
Old 08-17-2010 | 02:49 AM
  #17  
saab2000's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,755
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by F9er
The question should be: Are there going to be any OTHER 100 seat airplanes at the regionals? Republic currently flies a 100-1 seat and is a regional.
They don't fly those in a Fee For Departure agreement. The question is about that type of operation. Republic blurs the line of 'regional' because you can buy a ticket on an airline owned by RAH. You can't on most other FFD airlines which survive only on their Capacity Purchase Agreements.
Reply
Old 08-17-2010 | 02:59 AM
  #18  
Cruz Clearance's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Default

Sorry guys, 50+ seat RJs are not going to continue long for any Regional with a UA/CO contract. Everyone I talk to indicates scope is the #1 issue on the JCBA. Existing contracts will likely run until the expiration date but eventually any 50+ seat RJs will be flown by United pilots.
Reply
Old 08-17-2010 | 04:41 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Cruz Clearance
Sorry guys, 50+ seat RJs are not going to continue long for any Regional with a UA/CO contract. Everyone I talk to indicates scope is the #1 issue on the JCBA. Existing contracts will likely run until the expiration date but eventually any 50+ seat RJs will be flown by United pilots.
With all due respect, this is the funniest thing I have read in a while!!
Reply
Old 08-17-2010 | 04:49 AM
  #20  
saab2000's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,755
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by JDFlyer
With all due respect, this is the funniest thing I have read in a while!!
I think he's partly right. It all depends upon whether or not the mainline pilots are willing to hold the line on scope or even try to tighten it up in the face of probable gains in other areas in their contracts. The managements badly want relaxation of scope. The pilots want to tighten it. But management will undoubtedly offer some pretty big carrots for further relaxation.

The pilots will, however, have greater leverage in future contract negotiations.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tweet46
Foreign
152
04-24-2026 12:48 PM
JeepDrowner
Regional
85
10-03-2009 05:18 AM
Flyboy8784
Regional
42
05-30-2009 02:10 PM
jetsetter44
Corporate
4
08-04-2008 03:52 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices