Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
CAL/UAL Pilots Wanna stop Outsourcing to Reg >

CAL/UAL Pilots Wanna stop Outsourcing to Reg

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

CAL/UAL Pilots Wanna stop Outsourcing to Reg

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-31-2010 | 07:22 AM
  #91  
Captain Tony's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by C5Pilot
Personally I would take 2nd year pay at Delta/SWA/UAL over 7 RJ Capt pay any day, its sad people think $85 an hour is a decent wage in this industry,
That's the point! Do you really think management is going to suddenly decide to pay you 2nd year SWA pay ($184/$92) to fly an RJ?!! Really? If you want the flying, you'll have to fly them for the going rate. You do NOT have management over a barrel!
Reply
Old 08-31-2010 | 08:13 AM
  #92  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Captain Tony
That's the point! Do you really think management is going to suddenly decide to pay you 2nd year SWA pay ($184/$92) to fly an RJ?!! Really? If you want the flying, you'll have to fly them for the going rate. You do NOT have management over a barrel!
not yet at least.
Reply
Old 08-31-2010 | 08:38 AM
  #93  
Captain Tony's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TheBills
not yet at least.
You never will. What pilots don't "get" is that management is smarter than us! We always think we have them backed into a corner, just to find they thought of something we hadn't considered! This is why contracts need to be renegotiated every 3-5 years instead of being permanent!
Reply
Old 08-31-2010 | 09:48 AM
  #94  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by Captain Tony
Huh? You're saying you'd fly a CRJ700 for Go Jet pay (CA max/15 yrs $93/hr; FO max/4 years $36. Really? Ok, put your money where your mouth is. Go ahead and take it.

I don't think you're speaking for a majority!
We aren't talking about me. We are talking about CAL/UAL whom has 147/1400+ on furlough. The J4J program has UAL furloughs flying the right seat of GoJets & Skywest for those wages right now. So taking back that flying at those payrates isn't a hit for them. It would get them back on line at mainline and they'd most likely end up under better work rules with the new contract, or in the case of Skywest work rules period.

If they have furloughees flying those airplanes while they aren't at mainline then it's clear that they'd have ZERO problems doing it at mainline under a better contract. As you've said, it's not all about $$$.
Reply
Old 08-31-2010 | 10:01 AM
  #95  
Diver Driver's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,634
Likes: 0
From: Tiki bar
Default

Originally Posted by Captain Tony
Huh? You're saying you'd fly a CRJ700 for Go Jet pay (CA max/15 yrs $93/hr; FO max/4 years $36. Really? Ok, put your money where your mouth is. Go ahead and take it.

I don't think you're speaking for a majority!
Regardless of the current rates, those jobs should be at mainline. I believe that 50 seat + and all Jets should be mainline flying.
Reply
Old 08-31-2010 | 10:01 AM
  #96  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Captain Tony
You never will. What pilots don't "get" is that management is smarter than us! We always think we have them backed into a corner, just to find they thought of something we hadn't considered! This is why contracts need to be renegotiated every 3-5 years instead of being permanent!
Jerry A just post under your real name, jeez!

I love how the whole RJ is the argument to be paid less, I think this is what UAL pilots are trying to say as well, just because it's an RJ doesn't mean you have to be paid like sh!t. I and not saying they are going to give me a raise to $95 hr to throw gear, I could see $50-55 and hour to throw gear. I think the comparison is that if a guy goes to a major at year 5 from a regional, he will be in a much better position at year 10 at the major verses year 15 at the regional, probably about $100 an hour better. Anyway I hope there is a regional around in 20 years. At some point I think these majors are going to realize you get what you pay for and as in the case of Mesa, it is just a terrible product because they pay their FA's dirt and no one wants to work there, be interesting to see what the 1500 hr rule does when these regionals need 200 pilots a month off the street.
Reply
Old 08-31-2010 | 10:01 AM
  #97  
Captain Tony's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
We aren't talking about me. We are talking about CAL/UAL whom has 147/1400+ on furlough. The J4J program has UAL furloughs flying the right seat of GoJets & Skywest for those wages right now. So taking back that flying at those payrates isn't a hit for them. It would get them back on line at mainline and they'd most likely end up under better work rules with the new contract, or in the case of Skywest work rules period.

If they have furloughees flying those airplanes while they aren't at mainline then it's clear that they'd have ZERO problems doing it at mainline under a better contract. As you've said, it's not all about $$$.
You're right. The +/- 1400 furloughees ar United are the wild card I hadn't considered. They'd probably take such a deal just to get back to mainline.

But that's only 1400 pilots. Where they get the other 5000 or so pilots flying RJs in UAL or CAL colors from? They can't interview, hire, and train that fast. it would have to be a staple.
Reply
Old 08-31-2010 | 10:04 AM
  #98  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by Captain Tony
Huh? You're saying you'd fly a CRJ700 for Go Jet pay (CA max/15 yrs $93/hr; FO max/4 years $36. Really? Ok, put your money where your mouth is. Go ahead and take it.

I don't think you're speaking for a majority!
Would you fly a CRJ700 for $93/hr at 15 years max? And why?
Reply
Old 08-31-2010 | 10:08 AM
  #99  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

FWIW, the majority see's the CRJ700 and sees an annoyance, the CRJ900 and they see a threat, and the EMB175 as a WTH?

Had the EMB175 not been built, this would've garnered a lot less attention. Now to see a jet that is not an extended RJ flying and not a range limited BAE146 around for someone else, has gotten a lot of attention. Especially at UAL.

Heck, the CAL pilots see the Dash 8-400s as a direct 735 replacement and they're right.

And again, management, not to thrilled to have funded CHQ turned RAH turned Midwest and Frontier. I think next time they'll cut the next "we'll go it alone!" at the knees before they have the money to pull off purchasing profitable planes.
Reply
Old 08-31-2010 | 10:09 AM
  #100  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by Captain Tony
You're right. The +/- 1400 furloughees ar United are the wild card I hadn't considered. They'd probably take such a deal just to get back to mainline.

But that's only 1400 pilots. Where they get the other 5000 or so pilots flying RJs in UAL or CAL colors from? They can't interview, hire, and train that fast. it would have to be a staple.

That's why the proposal is to bring it back under mainline progressively, over the course of several years.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jonathanpaul
Pilot Health
19
09-08-2010 04:29 AM
Rabid Seagull
Major
39
05-27-2009 02:56 PM
Maxclimb12
Major
1
03-18-2009 03:52 PM
Flatspin
Regional
43
02-16-2009 07:45 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices