Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Skywest opens IAH base

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-29-2010 | 05:39 AM
  #21  
Bandera89's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: UAL 2172
Thumbs up SCOPE at UAL

Originally Posted by buddies8
what part of the merger requires that the seniority list be merged and what part of the merger requires a new contract for the merger to be complete?

Cannot the new UAL operate as is today? Has any of the UAL or CAL operating certificates been turned in to the FAA? If not , then cannot the new UAL Holding corporation operate both certificates simultaneously as they are now and the CAL flying just transfered over to the other division operated by old UAL where the scope provisions are more lax to CAL's?

Want to bet that this is the plan unless mgt gets what it wants. What would CAL pilots do, go on strike, call in sick, there are what about 1400 UAL pilots furloughed still which would be recalled back with all the new UAL/old and gone CAL flying moved to UAL. That is the real world that ALPA has made for the regional pilots, now it will play out in mainlines. Get the popcorn ready.
Need to get the facts. There is a transition agreement that does not allow this to go on. As one of those, UAL 1437 pilots, I can say most of us have been in the industry long enough to not fall into this trap. CAL pilots are our brothers and most of us UAL furloughees look at the big picture. That would be SCOPE...get the 70+ seat flying back.
2172 Strong
Reply
Old 10-29-2010 | 05:50 AM
  #22  
mmaviator's Avatar
pants on the ground
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,359
Likes: 0
From: back seat
Default

Originally Posted by Bandera89
Need to get the facts. There is a transition agreement that does not allow this to go on. As one of those, UAL 1437 pilots, I can say most of us have been in the industry long enough to not fall into this trap. CAL pilots are our brothers and most of us UAL furloughees look at the big picture. That would be SCOPE...get the 70+ seat flying back.
2172 Strong
Originally Posted by buddies8
what part of the merger requires that the seniority list be merged and what part of the merger requires a new contract for the merger to be complete?

Cannot the new UAL operate as is today? Has any of the UAL or CAL operating certificates been turned in to the FAA? If not , then cannot the new UAL Holding corporation operate both certificates simultaneously as they are now and the CAL flying just transfered over to the other division operated by old UAL where the scope provisions are more lax to CAL's?

Want to bet that this is the plan unless mgt gets what it wants. What would CAL pilots do, go on strike, call in sick, there are what about 1400 UAL pilots furloughed still which would be recalled back with all the new UAL/old and gone CAL flying moved to UAL. That is the real world that ALPA has made for the regional pilots, now it will play out in mainlines. Get the popcorn ready.
can't afford free popcorn.....this will have to do for now.


Reply
Old 10-29-2010 | 06:04 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Default

No one will have trouble jumpseating out of IAH, whoever is thinking this is being absolutely ridiculous. Watch out for some of the CAL gate agents though, some of them just hate life in general and take it out on you.
Reply
Old 10-29-2010 | 06:05 AM
  #24  
Captain Tony's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Bandera89
Need to get the facts. There is a transition agreement that does not allow this to go on. As one of those, UAL 1437 pilots, I can say most of us have been in the industry long enough to not fall into this trap. CAL pilots are our brothers and most of us UAL furloughees look at the big picture. That would be SCOPE...get the 70+ seat flying back.
2172 Strong
Ha ha, you better do better than that. If you draw the line at 70+, they will be flying CRJ-700s with 65 seats. Wait, we already do that for Delta.

Pilots=stupid. Management=smart.

Gee, I wonder if management has message boards like this where they try to prove to everyone how smart they are. Oh THEY DON'T! I wonder why...?
Reply
Old 10-29-2010 | 06:20 AM
  #25  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by Captain Tony
Ha ha, you better do better than that. If you draw the line at 70+, they will be flying CRJ-700s with 65 seats. Wait, we already do that for Delta.

Pilots=stupid. Management=smart.

Gee, I wonder if management has message boards like this where they try to prove to everyone how smart they are. Oh THEY DON'T! I wonder why...?
I thought I was special. Thanks for ruining it.


Reply
Old 10-29-2010 | 06:26 AM
  #26  
Captain Tony's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
I thought I was special. Thanks for ruining it.


Funny....
Reply
Old 10-29-2010 | 09:05 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,707
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Bandera89
Need to get the facts. There is a transition agreement that does not allow this to go on. As one of those, UAL 1437 pilots, I can say most of us have been in the industry long enough to not fall into this trap. CAL pilots are our brothers and most of us UAL furloughees look at the big picture. That would be SCOPE...get the 70+ seat flying back.
2172 Strong
actually the first paragraph was a question asking if this could happen.
to be quite honest with you, reality does not play out the way you posted. big picture is if they offered you a recall, unless you are making big money elsewhere, you are coming back no matter what or loose your seniority. your brothers or not.
Reply
Old 10-29-2010 | 09:41 AM
  #28  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
I thought I was special. Thanks for ruining it.

You're a special kind of special
Reply
Old 10-29-2010 | 09:54 AM
  #29  
BYUFlyr's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
From: A320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Captain Tony
See, that's exactly what I'm talking about. Grow up and take your frustrations out on management, not the pilots who are being forced to do the flying!!!!!

A jumpseat war benefits no one. Don't even make the threat!!!
Ditto......
Reply
Old 10-29-2010 | 09:58 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Default

I really don't know why everyone says don't take it out on the pilots...it would seem to me that its nothing personal but I wouldn't gona take you to work to take my/someones job. Look we can't do anything to the man so get at them through canceled flights by not allowing a jumpseater on...you would do more damage to the opperation....a little pain now to make thongs better for us all in the future....you want to refuse me the JS he'll yeh to right ahead....I have a contract that protects me....o you SW boys don't have that....sucks to be you...

Last edited by XJT Pilot; 10-30-2010 at 01:15 AM. Reason: Had to T/O quick Sorry!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
newarkblows
Regional
265
08-12-2010 12:21 PM
Koolaidman
Regional
39
09-04-2007 09:36 PM
stanrhintx
Regional
76
11-10-2006 09:56 AM
JustAMushroom
Regional
65
07-16-2006 10:44 PM
geshields
Major
2
08-16-2005 03:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices