![]() |
Originally Posted by SilverandSore
(Post 907789)
I've already used the UPS analogy in this thread. We aren't UPS and the way this is being presented is as a benefit, which it very likely will not be, we don't even know if the company is inclined to go the blended route of the override route, but history is on my side, Skywest uses an override. If the blended rate is higher than the current 700 rate plus whatever increase the new contract offers, I am all for it. Otherwise, no thanks, I'm not interested in this concession.
As for my analogy, many corporate departments use co-captains where they swap seats during the trip for same pay, remember, it's blended, it's all even in the end. Isn't that really best for you to have all your options? The only reason why I'm even on this thread talking about this is because any modest raise to XJT's concessionary rates on their ERJs would be higher than current 76 seat rates at ASA. So I dont see a blended rate being lower than the current 700 pay. As for the company going for it, it would save them a lot of training costs. |
Is there any word on when the pilot lists will be put together? How will it work out. If ASA is hiring new pilots will they be going to the bottom of the list since EXJ has more pilots or is it a 1 for 1?
|
Originally Posted by Hikoki4fun
(Post 908820)
Is there any word on when the pilot lists will be put together? How will it work out. If ASA is hiring new pilots will they be going to the bottom of the list since EXJ has more pilots or is it a 1 for 1?
|
Originally Posted by Hikoki4fun
(Post 908820)
Is there any word on when the pilot lists will be put together? How will it work out. If ASA is hiring new pilots will they be going to the bottom of the list since EXJ has more pilots or is it a 1 for 1?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:36 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands