![]() |
Originally Posted by Captain Tony
(Post 903196)
And before you all get spooled up, I know for a fact that our MEC puts exactly zero weight on message board posts when making decisions. So the only valid place to discuss this and have your opinion counted is in the survey or directly with the reps.
|
Originally Posted by Captain Tony
(Post 903193)
I don't think that pilots who have never flown the -700/900 should have their opinion counted as to whether we should fly both. Unless you've done it, you have nothing to base that opinion on except selfish financial or schedule motivation, and most 700 pilots will tell you they don't ever want to fly the 200 again!
How about this: get senior enough to bid it instead of trying to steal seniority/pay from the ones already on it? The 700 is a much much better flying airplane but the 200 has much more variety due to the greater number of destinations and UAL flying. If in the JCBA contract we get a blended payrate that is higher than current 700/900 pay in return for dual qual I don't even think the senior guys will want to pass that up. |
here are a few things I suggested in the survey in no particular order:
1) a no furlough clause 2) no movement of off days at all 3) ready reserve reduced to 6 or 4 hours, 8 is just too long! 4) ability to use sick time as paid personal time, for example.....I would like next Thursday off so I schedule 3.75 of sick time to get the day off if staffing looks good. It then comes out of my sick bank and doesn't count against my attendance. 5) better pay that is just a few things |
How about incorporating the newly proposed FAA work rules into our contract since they can't seem to get them passed?
Particularly 8 hours behind the door and limits on duty day, INCLUDING deadhead! You XJETers may not know this, but ASA has been "creatively interpreting" the regs to not apply to anything other than flight duty to the Whitlow 16 hour limit. Actual quote from Scheduling: "We can deadhead you around for two days if we want to". Welcome to the party guys. |
Originally Posted by Trip7
(Post 903203)
I've flown the 700/900 and now on the 200 making more money with increased qol due to me having better seniority of the 200.
The 700 is a much much better flying airplane but the 200 has much more variety due to the greater number of destinations and UAL flying. If in the JCBA contract we get a blended payrate that is higher than current 700/900 pay in return for dual qual I don't even think the senior guys will want to pass that up. |
Originally Posted by gtechpilot
(Post 903217)
Apparently FO opinions don't count!
|
Here's another nice tidbit to discuss: the question about forcing senior lineholders onto reserve to "relieve" those stuck on long term reserve?
|
Originally Posted by Captain Tony
(Post 903193)
I don't think that pilots who have never flown the -700/900 should have their opinion counted as to whether we should fly both. Unless you've done it, you have nothing to base that opinion on except selfish financial or schedule motivation, and most 700 pilots will tell you they don't ever want to fly the 200 again!
How about this: get senior enough to bid it instead of trying to steal seniority/pay from the ones already on it?
Originally Posted by Captain Tony
(Post 903196)
And before you all get spooled up, I know for a fact that our MEC puts exactly zero weight on message board posts when making decisions. So the only valid place to discuss this and have your opinion counted is in the survey or directly with the reps.
Originally Posted by Captain Tony
(Post 903221)
How do you come to that conclusion? And what did your statement really contribute to the conversation other than the self gratification of cheering for someone who told off someone you don't like?
Likely we'll fly together at some point and no doubt it'll be fun, so try not to be too offended by my internet flippancy. :) |
Originally Posted by Captain Tony
(Post 903222)
Here's another nice tidbit to discuss: the question about forcing senior lineholders onto reserve to "relieve" those stuck on long term reserve?
|
Originally Posted by Captain Tony
(Post 903222)
Here's another nice tidbit to discuss: the question about forcing senior lineholders onto reserve to "relieve" those stuck on long term reserve?
The reserve rules are ridiculous... Plain and simple. Some of the guys at ASA spent zero time on reserve and never experienced what it has become. And the ones that spent some time on reserve didn't get the great experience of sitting Ready reserve 8 hours and then given a 4 day trip that starts two hours after your RR assignment should have ended... (10 hour sit) I have a feeling that the reserve rules will not be changed much in the the next contract.. I am sure we will just get a 30 year pay scale instead... Now,it would be amusing to hear some of the senior captains deal with scheduling while on reserve. Those conversations would be comical. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:36 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands