Instrument Current for SkyWest Class?
#11
Also, I have never had a log book signed. Just the signed form letter than hand out (for $10,000 worth of airline paid recurrent training). That's all I hand to the flying club, and they seem happy. I think I'm legal
#12
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,127
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Well, there's one nuance different from what I've been doing. The instructors are not airline employees (well, actually some are, just not from my airline) and I suspect must be CFI's.
Also, I have never had a log book signed. Just the signed form letter than hand out (for $10,000 worth of airline paid recurrent training). That's all I hand to the flying club, and they seem happy. I think I'm legal
Also, I have never had a log book signed. Just the signed form letter than hand out (for $10,000 worth of airline paid recurrent training). That's all I hand to the flying club, and they seem happy. I think I'm legal

A 121 PIC can (and often do) use their 121 PC's for 61 currency. 91 folks are probably not aware of the regulatory distinction between PIC and SIC.
The reason I keep pushing this is because if you apply to a US airline and have a bunch of GA in your logbook they will probably inquire about the lack of IPC/FR.
Does your letter say anything that flags the training as SIC-specific?
#13
You really have no idea of what a new hire 121 pilot goes through in initial training. Hmm... Private Pilot?
#14
I don't think so. I'll go look now. The last recurrent I did from the left seat anyway. Plus, we do them every six months.
Ok, just looked. These are the boxes on the form that are NOT checked are:
"SIC 61.55"
"BFR 61.56"
"instrument Competency Check 61.57"
The box that is checked is "Proficiency Check 61.58".
Box 28 of the form has checked "Three Takeoffs and Landings (Required for ATP, Landing Cert., and Recent Experience)"
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
makeitra
Flight Schools and Training
27
03-08-2010 10:24 PM




