Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
SkyWest warns of 1Q loss, 1st in 23 yrs >

SkyWest warns of 1Q loss, 1st in 23 yrs

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

SkyWest warns of 1Q loss, 1st in 23 yrs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-03-2011 | 08:49 PM
  #21  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
Doesn't matter. It's all Skywest Inc.
That's true Nevets. My comment wasn't hate directed at Xjet or ASA. I like both those companies and wish them the best. I just wanted to counter all the pro-union people who want to see Skywest do poorly. The Skywest division probably made a profit last quarter.

I'd much rather work for a non-union company. I was with Skywest and loved it. Now that i'm with CAL, I have an even larger appreciation for how much better it is to work for a non-union carrier.
The Gods must just like Skywest airlines better since what you quoted as being the reason ASA/XJT were hit harder was due to weather. Skyerst would have fared the same if they had the bases ASA/XJT have.

Don't think I didn't notice how Skywest fared poorly on their pro-rate flying. That must mean that ASA/XJT are better since the cost of jet fuel went up.

But then again, another reason was the increased training crew cost for the additional summer block hours that ASA/XJT is getting. I guess that means that Unical and DAL must know ASA/XJT is better.

None of the factors given had anything to do with union labor! jetblue, virgin America, allegiant are all hiring by the way.

Last edited by Nevets; 04-03-2011 at 09:06 PM.
Reply
Old 04-04-2011 | 04:14 PM
  #22  
MatchPoint's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rollin'
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
From: AA Airbus
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
Don't think I didn't notice how Skywest fared poorly on their pro-rate flying. That must mean that ASA/XJT are better since the cost of jet fuel went up.

But then again, another reason was the increased training crew cost for the additional summer block hours that ASA/XJT is getting. I guess that means that Unical and DAL must know ASA/XJT is better.
The pro-rate flying's not going so well with high fuel cost, what a shocker, but it was more of a short term venture until block hours increased anyways. Regardless SKW is flying record block hours for UAL/DAL and we are scheduled to receive many more a/c in the near future plus the start-up of our Alaska flying. We are so understaffed it's not even funny, it's pathetic how poorly Mgmt has handled this and they've started beating us with a stick when we refuse to help make up for their shortsightedness.

This “my airline is better than yours” is high school Bullsh--.

One List, One Union, One Airline!
Reply
Old 04-05-2011 | 02:33 AM
  #23  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by iahflyr
That's true Nevets. My comment wasn't hate directed at Xjet or ASA. I like both those companies and wish them the best. I just wanted to counter all the pro-union people who want to see Skywest do poorly. The Skywest division probably made a profit last quarter.

I'd much rather work for a non-union company. I was with Skywest and loved it. Now that i'm with CAL, I have an even larger appreciation for how much better it is to work for a non-union carrier.
WOW!!! Well just wait a few more years and ya might have a change of heart......I would bet money that if is wasn't for you union, all those ERJs would turn into CRJ-900s overnight and you might be wishing you were union.
Reply
Old 04-05-2011 | 07:53 AM
  #24  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,480
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MatchPoint
Regardless SKW is flying record block hours for UAL/DAL and we are scheduled to receive many more a/c in the near future plus the start-up of our Alaska flying.
YOUR Alaska flying? You're referring to the flying you'll be doing in AAG jets on AAG routes under AAG operational control? You mean the flying jobs you TOOK from Union Horizon pilots?

That's like Republic pilots talking about THEIR Midwest Express flying. With that attitude its no wonder SKW pilots are unwelcome on QX jumpseats.
Reply
Old 04-05-2011 | 02:00 PM
  #25  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,143
Likes: 7
From: 737
Default

Originally Posted by Fishfreighter
YOUR Alaska flying? You're referring to the flying you'll be doing in AAG jets on AAG routes under AAG operational control? You mean the flying jobs you TOOK from Union Horizon pilots?

That's like Republic pilots talking about THEIR Midwest Express flying. With that attitude its no wonder SKW pilots are unwelcome on QX jumpseats.
Skywest pilots aren't allowed in QX jumpseats? How about ASA pilots? Because the pilots have total control over what planes and flying they take...
Reply
Old 04-05-2011 | 02:17 PM
  #26  
duvie's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,246
Likes: 0
From: WB Bunkie
Default

Originally Posted by saxman66
Skywest pilots aren't allowed in QX jumpseats? How about ASA pilots? Because the pilots have total control over what planes and flying they take...
He said unwelcome, not "not allowed."

This is capitalism, not the boyscouts. SkyWest offers a comparable product at a lower price. And as most know, its not that SkyWest is cheap, its that Horizon is expensive. I'd love Horizon's pay scales and 401k matching, but then I'd be out of a job. I really don't mean to be snide, its just the truth about a contract industry.
Reply
Old 04-05-2011 | 02:41 PM
  #27  
clearprop's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
From: Right Seat Spouse
Default

Originally Posted by duvie
He said unwelcome, not "not allowed."

This is capitalism, not the boyscouts. SkyWest offers a comparable product at a lower price. And as most know, its not that SkyWest is cheap, its that Horizon is expensive. I'd love Horizon's pay scales and 401k matching, but then I'd be out of a job. I really don't mean to be snide, its just the truth about a contract industry.
Duvie hit the nail on the head. This is the dynamic of contract flying. Good, bad or indifferent...
Reply
Old 04-05-2011 | 04:06 PM
  #28  
MatchPoint's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rollin'
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
From: AA Airbus
Default

Pretty sure SKW signed a contract with AAG which means until that contract is voided it belongs to SKW. How AAG plans to utilize SKW is completely up to them. We pilots have no control, period. It's sad what has happened to Horizon or for that matter Frontier, Midwest, ATA, Pan Am, Eastern, Braniff, etc. but that's not just this industry but every industry. Someday i know the tide will turn on SKW and blaming another pilot group is just ridiculous.

As for the Union vs. Non-Union poke, that's just childish. I'm pro union and a very big advocate for One List / One Union with XJT/ASA but every time a non-union pilot reads postings like the one above they move further away from joining the cause. It's counterproductive and petty.
Reply
Old 04-05-2011 | 04:59 PM
  #29  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,480
Likes: 0
Default

The contract may be yours, but the jobs you're taking are Horizon's. Just exactly like the jobs Republic pilots took from Midwest Express. Duvie, just remember one thing while you enjoying SKW pay...it may be highest you ever get.
Reply
Old 04-05-2011 | 05:40 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,847
Likes: 9
Default

MatchPoint. Don't ever change your Avatar. Thanks.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rotorhead
Major
0
01-27-2009 06:50 AM
Past V1
Regional
64
04-28-2008 03:04 PM
fireman0174
Major
0
01-18-2007 02:29 PM
Sir James
Major
0
03-19-2005 12:46 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
03-10-2005 10:55 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices