Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
PNCL survial in peril- MEM article >

PNCL survial in peril- MEM article

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

PNCL survial in peril- MEM article

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-29-2011 | 06:18 AM
  #31  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by JoeMerchant
Yet another example that mainline pilots don't really get it. You should care whether G7 gets this or whether ASA keeps this flying. G7 is far cheaper than ASA both because of longevity and contract which puts added downward pressure on YOU and the rest of the Delta pilots. When this flying goes from ASA and CMR to cheaper operators like G7 it makes that much harder for you to ever recapture it, and it puts more downward pressure on what you still have left....Sorry, go ahead and stick your head back in the sand....
My head isn't in the sand Joe. I'll admit that I worded it poorly. I should care that these jets are going to a Teamsters pilot group. I want the flying back at mainline. The planes can come back to mainline, & the ALPA DCI pilots can be offered jobs at mainline. That's what I want.
Keep ALPA pilots unified, and get our flying on one list.
Reply
Old 12-29-2011 | 06:22 AM
  #32  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by DD214
And would you be OK with mainline flying the CRJs or ERJs and if so for what compensation are you willing to take?
Absolutely. I'd fly them. I'd find some of the best rates and go up from there. New FO rates would have to be negotiated because 1st yr pay regardless of equipment is $56 an hour. Even if it was a B scale the better work rules would make for a better QOL for those flying them at regionals.
Reply
Old 12-29-2011 | 06:27 AM
  #33  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by MusicPilot
True except Shuttle's still bringkng over aircraft that are 170s. Maybe already included in the count, but I know more are to come.
RgrMurdock is correct.

Originally Posted by RgrMurdock
Delta is maxed out on scope. The E170's going over are already counted. There may be room for a couple more. But no more than five 70 seaters are left to be had at delta. Unless of course they relax scope some more.
Reply
Old 12-29-2011 | 07:23 AM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Absolutely. I'd fly them. I'd find some of the best rates and go up from there. New FO rates would have to be negotiated because 1st yr pay regardless of equipment is $56 an hour. Even if it was a B scale the better work rules would make for a better QOL for those flying them at regionals.
And that my friend should be the wish of every pilot! How do we get to that point though
Reply
Old 12-29-2011 | 07:47 AM
  #35  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
My head isn't in the sand Joe. I'll admit that I worded it poorly. I should care that these jets are going to a Teamsters pilot group. I want the flying back at mainline. The planes can come back to mainline, & the ALPA DCI pilots can be offered jobs at mainline. That's what I want.
Keep ALPA pilots unified, and get our flying on one list.
ALPA "unify" pilots ?

That's a hoot.
Reply
Old 12-29-2011 | 08:00 AM
  #36  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Absolutely. I'd fly them. I'd find some of the best rates and go up from there. New FO rates would have to be negotiated because 1st yr pay regardless of equipment is $56 an hour. Even if it was a B scale the better work rules would make for a better QOL for those flying them at regionals.
$56/hour new-hires for RJ's ?

You can forget that.

If AMR's 1113's look anything like their last "best" proposal, the new-hire A319 pilot at AA would be $40/hour and second-year at $50/hour and the new full-time job of United and Delta management's (along with everyone else with comparable aircraft), will be how to get their pilot rates down to the new competitive bar.

The future 70 and 90-seat RJ new-hires will be half that. Problem is, is finding people willing to work for that.........well, if the jet is shiny enough, it beats a 172, so they'll probably get pilots, but not as many as the past. If one looks out across the typical hub now, one sees about 50% of the domestic flying covered by 50 to 70-seat RJ's. The majority of that will simply be replaced by 105-125 seat larger RJ's (really the A319Neo, 737Max and perhaps the Bomb C-series and E-190/195, but shhhhhh...........don't tell anyone they're really mainline-sized aircraft) and thus the future capacity obstacles will be improved, but with very little additional labor expense. Let's put that into perspective, shall we ?

50 dollars/hour times, say 75 hours/month times 12 months is $45,000/year. 4 years from now, with health care increases and inflation at average, that would equate to roughly about $37,500/year in todays dollars. That will be the MAJOR airline pilot with 18-24 months at his carrier's compensation, off probation and considered no longer a new-hire. This will be the new "bar" (as in, "lowring the bar"). This aircraft is likely to be a LARGE portion of AA future ops, so it may take a pilot 5 years or more to graduate to say, the 737NG, so with modest increases in hourly rate to say 5th year @ say $72/hour that makes the half-decade MAJOR airline pilot still flying this class of new RJ of the future about $65K.....but add another few years of upward medical and inflation and chop that back to about say, $52,000 in todays earning power and again, that will be the new bar that forces all the other competitors to chase. In reality, United, Delta, American, etc., will be the future regionals and their future pilots will be back flying many (though not all) of those routes, just for essentially regional scale (pay, scheduling constraints and 401(k)). I don't see the current major hopefuls out there getting what they dreamed of and I see a LOT of anger and disappointment coming.

If only pilots weren't blinded by shiny metal, perhaps they could see the forest through the airplanes, eh ?

As far as any 70 and 90-seat RJ's...............well, those will have no choice but to pay REAL peanuts to labor for their lack of revenue generation ability. BTW, the above hypotheticals involve the pay "band" for the A319. The 737Max @ 105-seats and smaller RJ's are noticably less. THAT is the future that is about to be unleashed by one major carrier with a perfectly timed BK as far as pilot labor cost adjustment is concerned. The other competitors will not be able to laugh that off and unless they can compete on an "even playing field", they very well might have no choice but to play the same card if profits drop off. It's already obvious they see they're going to have a REAL problem. Even SWA has fired that shot across the bow of its employees STRICTLY based on this new development.

See ! Pulling a rabbit out of the at ain't so hard. All it takes is a little inginuity and some time...........well, that and a lot of dopey pilots, of course.

The argument that.........."well, THIS TIME we're going to hold the line !", etc. or other such nonsense is proved absurd simply by looking at the past. It's a past whereby airline management (AKA the 1%ers) has run roughshod over pilots with virtually no resistance and considering the greater leverage that existed in the past as compared to now, makes any such claim laughable, to say the least. ALPA, especially has a distinct record of stepping aside to avoid excessive bruising when the charge of management rumbles toward them. The Midwest debacle and the TWA disaster just a couple of examples.

Last edited by eaglefly; 12-29-2011 at 08:32 AM.
Reply
Old 12-29-2011 | 08:31 AM
  #37  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

eaglefly,

Delta already has pay rates for the CRJ900. The 1st yr pay is currently $56 an hour.
Reply
Old 12-29-2011 | 08:46 AM
  #38  
Al Czervik's Avatar
You scratched my anchor
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,126
Likes: 85
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
eaglefly,

Delta already has pay rates for the CRJ900. The 1st yr pay is currently $56 an hour.
You will never fly them. That's the point.
Reply
Old 12-29-2011 | 09:06 AM
  #39  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by Al Czervik
You will never fly them. That's the point.
Can I borrow your crystal ball?
Reply
Old 12-29-2011 | 09:09 AM
  #40  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
eaglefly,

Delta already has pay rates for the CRJ900. The 1st yr pay is currently $56 an hour.
Well then, as stated above, you'll never see them. Especially if AA pays $40/hour for the A319. Your management would have to be certified idiots to put them under DAL's current pilot CBA at that rate. A new VERY low bar may be about to hit the profession like a tsunami and if it does, it inevitably it will wash your current pay rates out to sea.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DLax85
Cargo
35
04-23-2008 09:26 AM
2cylinderdriver
Cargo
186
04-02-2008 12:32 PM
CaptainGator
Cargo
77
10-13-2007 07:50 AM
Albief15
Cargo
126
07-19-2007 05:45 AM
CRJammin
Cargo
4
09-16-2005 06:18 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices