Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Age 67 Rule...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-21-2012 | 03:22 PM
  #51  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,480
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by throttleweenie
Seems to me they ought to be quitting sooner than later since they're so much better at planning their retirements and they also have a lot more time to recover from getting the rug yanked out from under them.
YES! Funny how all the young guys who moan about Age 65 swear they'll retire at 60. Wanna bet how many actually do?

Originally Posted by Andy
In 2012, I will hit 8+ years on furlough in the 12 years since being hired by United. I'm not alone in that fate; I'm just fortunate that I didn't get hired at AMR because those furloughees have seen their careers crater even more than United furloughees.
I've done OK financially since being furloughed but there are plenty of others who have had a very tough road to hoe.
Sounds like you made a bad career choice. BTW, its ROW to hoe. Its a farming term.

Originally Posted by Andy
65's now the law. It isn't going to get rolled back to 60..
No kidding. So I guess its time to quit whining about your furlough. You KNEW it was a possibility when you donned an airline uniform. We all did. Unfortunately, YOU got burned. Tough beans. By your own admission, you're doing well financially.

Perhaps its time to let it go.

Every time I read one of you myriad whining posts I am reminded of the old line from Animal House:

"Hey, you messed up. You trusted us."
Reply
Old 01-21-2012 | 03:24 PM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by Justdoinmyjob
Nobody "benevolently" retires, regardless of industry. It is incentives that make it worthwhile to go before you have to. My own Dad, used to say, "The day they give me a piece of paper with the right numbers on it, is the day I go." That day eventually came, and he promptly did not let the door hit him in the butt.
Shack! That was my point. Both Johnso29 and 80ktsClamp chose to leave out some pertinent details regarding retirements at Delta. You also pointed out some reasons for fNWA pilots to retire prior to 65 (I was aware that there were some financial issues that would benefit some fNWA pilots to retire prior to 65).
It's akin to pointing to AMR's retirements in the second half of 2011 and saying, 'see, many pilots are retiring prior to reaching 65'.

Given a choice, many (most) pilots would like to keep drawing paychecks until the day they die while crossing 40W. Safety be damned.
Reply
Old 01-21-2012 | 03:26 PM
  #53  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,480
Likes: 0
Default

Hey Andy,

Did you see the story about the Russian pilot who died on the flight deck this week. Massive heart attack. Age? 44.

Give it up on the "safety" red herring. I guess by your yardstick, people should retire at 44 now.
Reply
Old 01-21-2012 | 03:32 PM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by Fishfreighter
Sounds like you made a bad career choice. BTW, its ROW to hoe. Its a farming term.
Thanks; I grew up in the city. We had roads, not rows. My apologies for my ignorance with respect to tilling the earth.

Originally Posted by Fishfreighter
No kidding. So I guess its time to quit whining about your furlough. You KNEW it was a possibility when you donned an airline uniform. We all did. Unfortunately, YOU got burned. Tough beans. By your own admission, you're doing well financially.

Perhaps its time to let it go.

Every time I read one of you myriad whining posts I am reminded of the old line from Animal House:

"Hey, you messed up. You trusted us."
Can I use that answer the next time some jackwagon cries about not being able to retire?
As for an age change to age 65, I never envisioned it until late 2004. My bad. Heck, it took a couple of weeks for the ramifications of 9/11 to start to sink into my cranium.
Reply
Old 01-21-2012 | 03:33 PM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by Fishfreighter
Hey Andy,

Did you see the story about the Russian pilot who died on the flight deck this week. Massive heart attack. Age? 44.

Give it up on the "safety" red herring. I guess by your yardstick, people should retire at 44 now.
No; missed that story. I take it you suffer from Benjamin Button syndrome.
Reply
Old 01-21-2012 | 04:06 PM
  #56  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Default

65 was coming no matter what. However, they implemented at the worst possible time. They could have also have staggered/graduated up to 65 over a longer period of time.

They stopped career progression cold, and in doing so made the profession look even more unattractive for young people. I believe the end result will be cabotage of our domestic market purely because our country's staffing requirements will fall far short of demand.
Reply
Old 01-22-2012 | 01:25 AM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
From: retired
Default

Originally Posted by TopNotch
Heard they are preparing another rule change. Good luck to the new hires anticipating a 'pilot shortage'.

Does anyone know where the info is on this, from the unions or govt?
You guys are funny.You do know it took 25 years plus to change the age 60 rule.
Reply
Old 01-22-2012 | 01:34 AM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
From: retired
Default

Originally Posted by Fishfreighter
Hey Andy,

Did you see the story about the Russian pilot who died on the flight deck this week. Massive heart attack. Age? 44.

Give it up on the "safety" red herring. I guess by your yardstick, people should retire at 44 now.
Not that it makes any difference to him but said pilot was riding in the back.
Reply
Old 01-22-2012 | 01:37 AM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,524
Likes: 123
Default

Originally Posted by CaptainCarl
Here's a thought: Retire when you feel like it. Live a simple life within your means and squirrel away part of your paycheck everyday for the rest of your life. Depend on no company to guarantee you a handsome retirement check. Flying 'til you die is just greedy unless you have a good reason to push yourself that hard. Always be ready to walk away from a job with nothing but what you've saved and your experience.
Holster that logic. That's dangerous talk there.
Reply
Old 01-22-2012 | 06:58 PM
  #60  
Razorback flyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
From: Uncoveraged...
Default DAL retirements

Well, Here’s the actual retirement numbers for DAL (Sorry, don’t have any numbers for pre-merger.)
2009: 203
2010: 156
2011: 259
Total, 2009 – 2011: 618
(Notes: the 215 that were part of the early first early retirement program were spread between 2009 and 2010. All of the retirements from the second program left in 2011.)
 
Our Retirement and insurance committee put out some data about a year ago on projected retirements and actual behavior of over age 60 pilots. The projections were that roughly 45% would retire before 65, and 55% would stay until 65. The hard data reflected that. At the time, the oldest pilots were 63, and slightly over 40% of them had already retired or gone on LTD. So, if anything their projections seem a little conservative.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Brown
Major
115
12-27-2007 07:47 AM
fireman0174
Major
46
11-19-2006 05:49 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices