Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

What am I missing?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-29-2012 | 09:41 AM
  #51  
Dashdog's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by slough
Apple is one of the richest companies in human history. There is no way for domestic students to finance training and there isn't money to pop up new schools. Pumping out huge amounts of 250 wonders isn't happening without easy credit, which probably won't be around for decades.
That's assuming that the students will keep paying. If the demand for cheap pilots gets high enough, then the employers will bear the cost of training. I don't think the MPL costs that much anyway.
Reply
Old 02-29-2012 | 10:31 AM
  #52  
mike734's Avatar
New boss = Old boss
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,763
Likes: 1
From: Ca B737
Default

Originally Posted by Dashdog
You think that there is a shortage of foreigners willing to take American jobs for lower wages? I guess you haven't read a paper for the last 20+ years. Once the airline industry educates the public as to the benefits of cabotage (i.e. lower fares), I don't think there will be any way to stop it. The airline lobby certainly has enough money to buy the legislation, and the public will give up any objections once they start seeing those $29 fares again.

Just my pessimistic $.02. FWIW YMMV blah blah blah...
And that's why everyone should contribute to the ALPA PAC. I contribute $50/mo. I don't like it but no one will fight for our industry like them.
Reply
Old 02-29-2012 | 11:09 AM
  #53  
Sr. Barco's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Dashdog
It will come from the inevitable pilot mills that will start up when the demand hits. Look how fast Apple got their China plant up and running with what, 230,000 trained workers?
China is a communist country. These factory workers make a couple bucks an hour and the state takes the profits. That's not a valid comparison of conditions in the U.S. (yet).

Ten years ago a zero to hero program cost $40,000 and could be easily financed. That same program now costs $120,000 and is not easily financed. I assume the U.S. is the cheapest place to learn to fly based on the number of foreign students who learn to fly here. Furthermore, when evaluating a career choice who is going to finish college, pay $120,000 for flight school to make $18,000/year to work 14 hours a day and commute to Newark? The gig is up. Other career fields pay well and don't treat you like trash.
Reply
Old 02-29-2012 | 11:13 AM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Sr. Barco
China is a communist country. These factory workers make a couple bucks an hour and the state takes the profits. That's not a valid comparison of conditions in the U.S. (yet).

Ten years ago a zero to hero program cost $40,000 and could be easily financed. That same program now costs $120,000 and is not easily financed. I assume the U.S. is the cheapest place to learn to fly based on the number of foreign students who learn to fly here. Furthermore, when evaluating a career choice who is going to finish college, pay $120,000 for flight school to make $18,000/year to work 14 hours a day and commute to Newark? The gig is up. Other career fields pay well and don't treat you like trash.
+1

Something has to give, and soon.
Reply
Old 03-01-2012 | 07:43 AM
  #55  
PILOTGUY's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Default

and there are plenty of American pilots willing to work for foreign companies to earn a great deal more. On the flip side, it is as you said...I mean, why WOULD a foreigner go to America and earn less money??

The growth rate (and/or plan) at some of the foreign carriers is massive. If and when they ever have trouble recruiting, the packages will just get increased.

If you have the time, you can go contract in Asia for 189k per year to start.

Yes, the US is still the cheapest place to conduct flight training. 6 months ago at least, there were no banks in the US that will provide loans for flight training.

Originally Posted by Surprise
Precisely. In general, there do seem to be plenty of foreigners willing to work "American" jobs for less. The IT field and manufacturing come to mind. But I don't believe that's true for pilots, at least right now. Why else do Emirates, Qatar, ANA, and a host of Chinese and other southeast Asian carriers keep showing up at job fairs in the US?
Reply
Old 03-01-2012 | 09:42 AM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Sr. Barco
China is a communist country. These factory workers make a couple bucks an hour and the state takes the profits. That's not a valid comparison of conditions in the U.S. (yet).

Ten years ago a zero to hero program cost $40,000 and could be easily financed. That same program now costs $120,000 and is not easily financed. I assume the U.S. is the cheapest place to learn to fly based on the number of foreign students who learn to fly here. Furthermore, when evaluating a career choice who is going to finish college, pay $120,000 for flight school to make $18,000/year to work 14 hours a day and commute to Newark? The gig is up. Other career fields pay well and don't treat you like trash.
+1

Great point. Factors working in our favor over the next five years:

1) Improving economy (though questionable - biggest wildcard)
2) Age 65 rule ending
3) Worldwide demand increasing
4) Higher rest requirements
5) ATP rule - how many ab initio students willing to get 1000-1500 hrs?
6) Lack of available credit
7) Cost of training
8) cost/benefit analysis of starting flying vs other career options

Personally I'm on the 2 year plan. Stick it out no matter what until end of 2013 or so, then evaluate. If there is obvious movement and good positive trend, I'll stay, if not, back to my old business .
Reply
Old 03-01-2012 | 08:30 PM
  #57  
New Hire
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by drrhythm2
+1

Great point. Factors working in our favor over the next five years:

1) Improving economy (though questionable - biggest wildcard)
2) Age 65 rule ending
3) Worldwide demand increasing
4) Higher rest requirements
5) ATP rule - how many ab initio students willing to get 1000-1500 hrs?
6) Lack of available credit
7) Cost of training
8) cost/benefit analysis of starting flying vs other career options

Personally I'm on the 2 year plan. Stick it out no matter what until end of 2013 or so, then evaluate. If there is obvious movement and good positive trend, I'll stay, if not, back to my old business .
Which is - if you don't mind me asking? I like that plan and I like it even better that you have a back up plan. I have too many friends (pilots) that don't...
Reply
Old 03-02-2012 | 12:48 PM
  #58  
FedexWannabie's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Another RJ Captain
Default

I think it is pretty clear that even though some new hires will chase the quick upgrade (like Mesa last time) many of the smaller regionals (I won't name names) will fail / liquidate simply because they cannot keep up either hiring or training once the majors really start hiring again. The majors will not have staffing problems to speak of. They may have training issues... Delta for example, The list posted earlier, The rate of attrition just due to 65 exceeds their current maximum training through put capability.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Aviation Law
2
12-10-2010 06:56 AM
KC10 FATboy
Military
3
06-22-2010 11:20 AM
robbreid
Corporate
1
06-21-2010 07:25 PM
beebopbogo
Aviation Law
28
08-25-2009 05:06 PM
deadstick35
Regional
29
05-02-2008 04:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices