Pilot pay (supply & demand)
#41
My point was.........the company (FDX anyway and most others too I imagine) owns you while you are "off duty" during a layover in the hotel ..............See where I'm Going??
#42
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,425
I'm not talking about merely flying duties. Jetblue pilots already are required to help pick up the cabin and cross seatbelts. Next us regional pilots will have to start throwing bags because we're on the clock.
#43
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,425
As far as 6 hour min day - I think that coupled with 80 hour min guarantee = almost 17 days off/month. While this is good for us, I would think the airlines would scoff at that seeing as though most places range from 8-10 (here we are at 12 for reserve and line holder). Also, 80/6 = 13.333. It's hard to get 1/3 day off .
My forumula was a nice easy figure with realistic expectations. 16 on/14 off per month min is a reasonable expectation for the future IMO. Of course, if your days credited more then 5 hours you could get more days off.
#44
If you aren't..........Get a Union organized.
If you do, during negotiations if the company proposes you sling bags or cross seat belts.(provided your membership is ok with it) tell them to **** off or.................... offer to do it for a large CASH Premium ..............
Last edited by RedeyeAV8r; 10-27-2006 at 02:35 PM.
#45
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 7ER B...whatever that means.
Posts: 3,966
I help the FA cross seat belts and pick up trash at the outstations but thats because Im a nice guy...
#46
Longevity scales anyone?
So what is the point of all this?
The "hourly" pay rates understand that for every hour flying, there are many others where you are on duty but "not getting paid" for it.
If you want to re-define the work rules, all that will mean is the hourly rate for work will go down...
The "hourly" pay rates understand that for every hour flying, there are many others where you are on duty but "not getting paid" for it.
If you want to re-define the work rules, all that will mean is the hourly rate for work will go down...
Navy (see below) has it right with one exception..... Would the flood gates ever open as high if would be pilots saw a job in store paying $30.00 vs the current $60.00?
Final thought there has been some good posts regarding a fix of the longevity scales. Imagine an environment where if you didn't like mgt after xxxxx years or the company closed a base in your hometown you could quit and go elsewhere without going back to $20.00 First year pay will always suck to pay for training costs. However if the second year was around 50.00 to 80.00 for most regionals. Being tied to your co would be less of an issue. I know NSL addresses this but that is a union tool, And I don't have all the answers. I'm just looking for an economic fix. To present to ALPA (we have new leadership now) or whoever your assoc is. I'm still waiting for the post fix mesa & you fix the industry. However that is still "small potatoes" if you know what I mean.
Originally Posted by navvyj
think the idea is to convience people to not become pilots, create a shortage which will drive the wages back up....until of course, the wages become decent enough for people to come back, and the flood gates will open allowing wages to drop again.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post