Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Exceptions to H.R. 5900

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-12-2012 | 07:59 AM
  #31  
PerpetualFlyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Cruz5350
There must be a daily act of God occuring to keep Gulfstream/Silver pilots from not crashing all the time since they are soooooo bad.
Yea, it's not like you people landed at the wrong airport within the first few weeks of operating out of Dulles. Whoops...
Reply
Old 08-12-2012 | 09:51 AM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,496
Likes: 505
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
There is a correlation... you never had to fly with them as your FO! (not all were that way, but too many...)

All the captains in those accidents weren't from gulfstream- the FO on the Comair accident was, not the captain. Both on Pinnacle 3701, the FO on the MKE, FO on Comair, and CA on Colgan.
Again, it's a pretty far stretch to say those accidents can somehow be attributed to Gulfstream or its training. Especially when it's the FO being ex-Gulfstream in those accidents. I can also pick out several legacy airline crashes with both military pilots at the controls. Want to draw a correlation?

your saying when comparing the three major RJ airline crashes within a few years, and all three captains are from gulfstream, and its not a link?
The Comair Captain wasn't Gulfstream. The FO was Gulfstream, but a very long time ago before the accident. And with more flight time than the Captain. The Pinnacle MKE Captain wasn't gulfstream, and the CA made the decisions to continue on that one. As for Colgan, that Captain had numerous failures before and after Gulfstream. It was the system that failed. Besides, he lied on the application and no one caught it. Gulfstream or not, it was fact that Colgan was hiring 500 hr guys.
Reply
Old 08-12-2012 | 10:55 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
From: Doing what you do, for less.
Default

Gulfstream enables pilots who wouldn't be able to otherwise cut it to buy their way into an airline job. Getting to 1500TT and successfully interviewing is tough and a lot of people can't do it.

It isn't anything to do with Gulfstream's training itself, its that it (and other places like it) allow those on the lower end of the scale to slip through the cracks and become qualified enough to get into an airliner. Not to say there aren't some exceptional pilots that came through Gulfstream, but it also enables those without the natural skill/ability/drive/etc to become a successful airline pilot the chance at being one anyways.
Reply
Old 08-12-2012 | 11:27 AM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,496
Likes: 505
Default

Originally Posted by lolwut
Gulfstream enables pilots who wouldn't be able to otherwise cut it to buy their way into an airline job. Getting to 1500TT and successfully interviewing is tough and a lot of people can't do it.

It isn't anything to do with Gulfstream's training itself, its that it (and other places like it) allow those on the lower end of the scale to slip through the cracks and become qualified enough to get into an airliner. Not to say there aren't some exceptional pilots that came through Gulfstream, but it also enables those without the natural skill/ability/drive/etc to become a successful airline pilot the chance at being one anyways.
Ok, I think that's fair enough, but I wouldn't draw a correlation and say a statement that these accidents were 'because' of Gulfstream Academy pilots. And Gulfstream was hardly the only low-time option. There are tons more CRJ course operators that allow low time pilots to be hired. Besides, at one point in 2004-2007, some airlines like TSA and Piedmont were basically hiring at Commercial/Inst/ME ratings and 250 hours, with no RJ course.
Reply
Old 08-12-2012 | 12:10 PM
  #35  
DryMotorBoatin's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 0
From: Seat 0B
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
. Besides, at one point in 2004-2007, some airlines like TSA and Piedmont were basically hiring at Commercial/Inst/ME ratings and 250 hours, with no RJ course.
Hiring? Yes. Sending to the line? No. I think Piedmont was alot like TSA. The training department had no problem washing people out who couldn't hack it at TSA.
Reply
Old 08-12-2012 | 12:56 PM
  #36  
bcrosier's Avatar
Eats shoots and leaves...
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
From: Didactic Synthetic Aviation Experience Provider
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
Ok, I think that's fair enough, but I wouldn't draw a correlation and say a statement that these accidents were 'because' of Gulfstream Academy pilots.
I don't believe anyone said the fact the the pilots were from Gulfstream was directly causative, but rather that as lowlut aptly explained, they skipped over important, fundamental skills and knowledge that should have been acquired well before they were ever in the cockpit of a 121 carrier.

And Gulfstream was hardly the only low-time option. There are tons more CRJ course operators that allow low time pilots to be hired.
That is correct, and that is the problem with cut-outs or tiers to the legislation. 1500 hours, period, end of story. Not a perfect solution (I'd personally prefer a bar or board type system involving a panel as well as several loft type scenarios, which I think would be much more effective - but that's another discussion), but it's a start to raising the experience standards back to a very minimal level.

Besides, at one point in 2004-2007, some airlines like TSA and Piedmont were basically hiring at Commercial/Inst/ME ratings and 250 hours, with no RJ course.
See above.
Reply
Old 08-12-2012 | 04:01 PM
  #37  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by lolwut
Gulfstream enables pilots who wouldn't be able to otherwise cut it to buy their way into an airline job. Getting to 1500TT and successfully interviewing is tough and a lot of people can't do it.

It isn't anything to do with Gulfstream's training itself, its that it (and other places like it) allow those on the lower end of the scale to slip through the cracks and become qualified enough to get into an airliner. Not to say there aren't some exceptional pilots that came through Gulfstream, but it also enables those without the natural skill/ability/drive/etc to become a successful airline pilot the chance at being one anyways.

shyguy- you missed the point. This post was what I was getting at.
Reply
Old 08-12-2012 | 06:20 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DryMotorBoatin
Hiring? Yes. Sending to the line? No. I think Piedmont was alot like TSA. The training department had no problem washing people out who couldn't hack it at TSA.
+1, however I do find it ironic that at certain regionals washing out weak people= quality people getting to the line, whereas in the eyes of certain others about Pinnacle and some other airlines, washing out the weak= training dept. not doing their job.
Reply
Old 08-12-2012 | 06:32 PM
  #39  
DryMotorBoatin's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 0
From: Seat 0B
Default

Originally Posted by IBPilot
+1, however I do find it ironic that at certain regionals washing out weak people= quality people getting to the line, whereas in the eyes of certain others about Pinnacle and some other airlines, washing out the weak= training dept. not doing their job.

Both scenarios are plausible.
Reply
Old 08-12-2012 | 06:36 PM
  #40  
Cruz5350's Avatar
Respek
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,938
Likes: 76
Default

Originally Posted by PerpetualFlyer
Yea, it's not like you people landed at the wrong airport within the first few weeks of operating out of Dulles. Whoops...
How about when Delta landed on the taxiway in ATL or NW overshot their destination you can point fingers all you want....
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ja2c
ExpressJet
38
05-02-2012 06:55 AM
SoCalGuy
United
6
12-10-2010 09:59 AM
Phrog Phlyer
Regional
8
05-02-2010 03:07 AM
nicholasblonde
Major
0
07-30-2009 02:38 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices