Originally Posted by higney85 (Post 1344933)

Unfortunately for you, the rest that know me personally,will know that neither picture fits. I did throw a punch at shyguy for chiming in, yet also commented that he was correct that the pay issues were a roadblock. In the end, it was a hope to neutralize and derail any of the quote/ignore games that have been ongoing.

After that point it had no bearing on who/what/when/where/why, but did explain the differences in philosophy of both training and certification with a fundamental impact on the theoretical possibility of an operation involving "dual qual".

80- you, yet again, tried to come to the rescue of shyguy, but were baited. Welcome to the party. Feel free to find material that you feel has any impact or response that would have any impact of the topic being discussed. Posting pictures of guys you google on the Internet does not bring anything useful to the forums that you moderate to bring pilots together to discuss issues that are currently being either deliberated or discussed.

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp (Post 1344935)

I know what you look like, higney. It was a joke. Try to have some humor in this life... it's going to be a long, rough road without it.

Originally Posted by lolwut (Post 1344942)

You have a framed picture of him above your computer, don't you?

Originally Posted by you

The problem was "a few fold". As you mentioned, pay, is still an issue (as an loa on the original JCBA introduced dual qual

Originally Posted by me

The issue at 9E for mixed flying wasnt so much a safety issue as it was a pay issue.

Originally Posted by you

but also currency (hard to stay current, and no point when the A/C only goes through one base that is closing),the FSDO (FAA) allowing it, followed by it being impossible to remain current with the current fences.

Originally Posted by me

the question of sim checking events. What if you hadn't touched a -900 in 6 months (not hard, with only 16) and then go into a -900 sim for evaluation. Not that it would be hard, but still it is 9E and who knows what could happen to you.

Originally Posted by you

Most will argue "safety" until the pay goes up, but with basically 3 groups right now (-200, -900 fenced, -900 unfenced) the training/pairing construction/pay issues become a big problem.

Originally Posted by me

With only 16 -900s and 140 -200s, if I recall management wanted vacation, sick and all that time to be paid at -200 rates, and only get the -900 rate when flying the -900, plus, Most pilots didn't want to touch this dual qual issue because of these pay/QOL issues.

Originally Posted by higney85 (Post 1344933)

Feel free to find material that you feel has any impact or response that would have any impact of the topic being discussed. Posting pictures of guys you google on the Internet does not bring anything useful to the forums that you moderate to bring pilots together to discuss issues that are currently being either deliberated or discussed.

Originally Posted by ShyGuy (Post 1344993)

So we basically said the same thing, but it's different because you said it? :D

Originally Posted by Kellwolf (Post 1345072)

http://kceducationenterprise.files.w...-6118720_s.jpg

There ya go. Feel better?

Originally Posted by lolwut (Post 1345126)