Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Pinnacle's 13-01 Award

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-16-2013 | 08:01 AM
  #21  
Noseeums's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by AtlCSIP
Real question here. If they reconfigure the 200's to have less than 50 seats, must they be removed? Is it possible that Pinnacle could fly 200's with 49 seats and not violate the provisions of the conditions for acquiring additional 900's?
Why remove a seat when you can just put a DO NOT OCCUPY placard on one of them (like Republic does with the Frontier E-190 to meet scope requirements)?

Anywho, I'd just go with the facts. All these positive spins from the new management team have no merit until there is something legit to back 'em up.
Reply
Old 02-16-2013 | 08:14 AM
  #22  
What's Avatar
Underpaid...
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,101
Likes: 0
From: French-Canadian
Default

Originally Posted by AtlCSIP
Real question here. If they reconfigure the 200's to have less than 50 seats, must they be removed? Is it possible that Pinnacle could fly 200's with 49 seats and not violate the provisions of the conditions for acquiring additional 900's?
I am not to versed on the Delta SCOPE, but one would think the language would read unto 50 seats or 50 seats or less. APA was burned with this already and that's how the E140 was born, built specifically for AMR as a way around SCOPE.
Reply
Old 02-16-2013 | 11:10 AM
  #23  
Avroman's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,142
Likes: 4
From: FIRE ALPA
Default

Pinnacle had the CRJ-440 , a 44 seat version with closets for the rest of the space. Then after the NWA bankruptcy and scope relaxing in 06 they all were converted to 50 seat CRJ-200s
Reply
Old 02-16-2013 | 11:23 AM
  #24  
Captain Tony's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by anthony210
At this point, I doubt we are going to furlough. The company has already said no furloughs in 2013. The new CEO was in the crew room this morning and hinted that the 200s are staying much longer than anticipated along with the new 900s coming. He also said it is possible we may have to hire at some point.
Oh, you mean they bluffed you guys into taking a massive pay cut (and screwing the rest of us) after all? Say it ain't so! Enjoy that 7 year contract at the bottom of the industry.
Reply
Old 02-16-2013 | 11:26 AM
  #25  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by MunkyButtr
Correction, "50 seaters" must be removed as the 900s are added.
Ok, so are you implying that other 50 seat operators will be reduced instead? Or are you implying that seats can be removed and will not count as 50 seaters? If its the latter, that won't work. A 50 seater is defined as an aircraft certified for 50 or less seats and a certificated MGTOW of up to 65,000 LBS.

With the agreement in place removing Pinnacle's CRJ200s is the cleanest way to remove 50 seaters from the DCI fleet.

Originally Posted by LoudFastRules
And your management has never weaseled out of contract provisions? I'm just asking...
No. Not in my experience.


Originally Posted by AtlCSIP
Real question here. If they reconfigure the 200's to have less than 50 seats, must they be removed? Is it possible that Pinnacle could fly 200's with 49 seats and not violate the provisions of the conditions for acquiring additional 900's?
No. The definition of 50 seater aircraft won't permit that.

Originally Posted by Pro Fessional
No. It's not possible.
Correct.

Originally Posted by What
I am not to versed on the Delta SCOPE, but one would think the language would read unto 50 seats or 50 seats or less. APA was burned with this already and that's how the E140 was born, built specifically for AMR as a way around SCOPE.
Originally Posted by Avroman
Pinnacle had the CRJ-440 , a 44 seat version with closets for the rest of the space. Then after the NWA bankruptcy and scope relaxing in 06 they all were converted to 50 seat CRJ-200s
We learned from that. The definition of a 50 seater is 0-50 seats. If one or more seats were removed to reduce the seat count below 50 then it's still a 50 seater.
Reply
Old 02-16-2013 | 11:31 AM
  #26  
Captain Tony's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
The 200s must be removed as the 900s are added.
Actually, they don't have to be down to 125 50 seaters until taking delivery of the 223rd 76 seater. Bet you they only get 222 of them. Oops.

Note one: Upon the delivery of a 223
rd 76-seat aircraft, the number of permitted
50-seat aircraft will be 125 regardless of the number otherwise provided in Section

1 b. 46. f. Exception one.
Reply
Old 02-16-2013 | 11:37 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Captain Tony
Oh, you mean they bluffed you guys into taking a massive pay cut (and screwing the rest of us) after all? Say it ain't so! Enjoy that 7 year contract at the bottom of the industry.

ahh yes more productive input from Uncle Tony, who was sitting in on the negotiations and has personally seen all the financial and planning documents and had Thanksgiving dinner with Spanjers and Anderson...
Reply
Old 02-16-2013 | 11:39 AM
  #28  
Captain Tony's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by IBPilot
ahh yes more productive input from Uncle Tony, who was sitting in on the negotiations and has personally seen all the financial and planning documents and had Thanksgiving dinner with Spanjers and Anderson...
And? That contributed absolutely nothing to this discussion except to pump your ego by bragging that you're some union insider "big shot". Are you saying that they ARE going to furlough because the -200s ARE really leaving? Or are you just attacking me for saying something you didn't like, regardless of whether it's true or not?
Reply
Old 02-16-2013 | 11:49 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Captain Tony
And? That contributed absolutely nothing to this discussion except to pump your ego by bragging that you're some union insider "big shot". Are you saying that they ARE going to furlough because the -200s ARE really leaving? Or are you just attacking me for saying something you didn't like, regardless of whether it's true or not?
didn't realize paying 1.95% and getting a magazine and occasional sticker/luggage tag made me a insider big shot, but thanks. Or do you not know how to read and you think I had dinner with them? ...pumping my ego? Pot meet kettle.
Reply
Old 02-16-2013 | 11:55 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,648
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Ok, so are you implying that other 50 seat operators will be reduced instead? Or are you implying that seats can be removed and will not count as 50 seaters? If its the latter, that won't work. A 50 seater is defined as an aircraft certified for 50 or less seats and a certificated MGTOW of up to 65,000 LBS.

With the agreement in place removing Pinnacle's CRJ200s is the cleanest way to remove 50 seaters from the DCI fleet.



No. Not in my experience.




No. The definition of 50 seater aircraft won't permit that.



Correct.





We learned from that. The definition of a 50 seater is 0-50 seats. If one or more seats were removed to reduce the seat count below 50 then it's still a 50 seater.
Don't worry, you'll get you 717's and mad dogs, and we'll shrink as you want
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lolwut
Major
1144
09-18-2013 09:22 PM
Xray678
Mergers and Acquisitions
8
12-13-2008 04:56 PM
Coffee Bitch
Cargo
115
05-23-2007 08:02 AM
Sir James
Major
100
05-12-2007 12:11 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices