Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
IBT National overrules Local 357's NC >

IBT National overrules Local 357's NC

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

IBT National overrules Local 357's NC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-05-2013 | 09:03 AM
  #81  
5ontheglide's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
From: Left
Default

So when do the Teamsters stop emptying the trash cans in IND HQ?

Cuz that was a big selling point for me when we were choosing IBT, fapa, rpc...

Oh the stink!!! 1.7 million strong.
Reply
Old 03-05-2013 | 10:11 AM
  #82  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Default

I'm pretty ticked at the IBT right now, but I don't regret not voting for FAPA/RPC. Maybe the AFA would have been a good choice.
Reply
Old 03-05-2013 | 10:35 AM
  #83  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 963
Likes: 0
From: What day is it?
Default

Originally Posted by Oskeewowow
I'm pretty ticked at the IBT right now, but I don't regret not voting for FAPA/RPC. Maybe the AFA would have been a good choice.
Did IBT negotiators from the Airline Division negotiate for you or did your own people?

BIG difference.
Reply
Old 03-05-2013 | 01:03 PM
  #84  
todd1200's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 7
Default

Originally Posted by FAULTPUSH
FAR 121 differentiates between "rest period" and "free of duty". I'm guessing that you can't find an interpretation that says "duty" includes making a phone call or going online.

http://www.nata.aero/data/files/abj/...ations_abj.pdf
The document you linked to directly contradicts your assertion. Any time a pilot is required to do anything, that period cannot be considered rest.
Reply
Old 03-05-2013 | 02:49 PM
  #85  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 987
Likes: 37
Default

Originally Posted by Oskeewowow
I think that is horrible advice. The whole reason our FOs are topped out at 36.62 on a four year payscale is because in 2003, our pilots thought exactly like you're suggesting. No one thought upgrades would be more than two years. The short term took precedence over the long term. Not just in pay, but in RSV rules. That mentality screwed over much of our pilot group.

I'm a relatively senior FO and I will probably upgrade within a year. The new FO payrates will not effect me very much. I and hopefully most of our pilots will not sell our future co-workers down the river for a short term gain.

You'll have to forgive FAULTPUSH. He lives in a world where concessions are good. He just doesnt know any better. You cant argue with stupid.
Reply
Old 03-05-2013 | 03:05 PM
  #86  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 18
Default

How did FAULTPUSH get hired at Frontier? Did they not do a tech interview? His misinterpretation of the FARs would have been easy to spot.
Reply
Old 03-05-2013 | 03:06 PM
  #87  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
From: A320 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by flyguy23
You'll have to forgive FAULTPUSH. He lives in a world where concessions are good. He just doesnt know any better. You cant argue with stupid.

Quite frankly, STUPID is when RAH wanted to give the FO'S a $5 dollar an hour pay raise without the pilot group giving anything in return! Of course, the pilot group turned it down. Why, Is the million dollar question?
Reply
Old 03-05-2013 | 04:01 PM
  #88  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: Eff Oh Won Fo Fife
Default

Originally Posted by Bolo
Quite frankly, STUPID is when RAH wanted to give the FO'S a $5 dollar an hour pay raise without the pilot group giving anything in return! Of course, the pilot group turned it down. Why, Is the million dollar question?
In late '08 or early '09 the IBT tried to draw up an LOA to increase FO pay and give slight increases beyond the topped out five year mark. WH literally laughed.

Flash forward to '12 and the Company can't fill seats because of that same laughable pay, but now WH/BB are all concerned about our FO's financial wellbeing.

Not being able to attract new hires because of the crappy contract is one of the few pieces of leverage we have. As someone sitting at the 36.62 mark, I will grudgingly sit at this payrate a bit longer in an effort to fix some of the QoL items in our contract for everyone (and in the long term, myself even after I upgrade). Slightly more pay without fixing such items as cancelation pay, minimum duty day, and real overtime pay are useless.

These QoL/ softpay issues are going to be even more important when the new rest and duty rules go into effect as the schedules are likely to become much more unproductive.
Reply
Old 03-05-2013 | 04:55 PM
  #89  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
From: A320 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by WeaselBoy
In late '08 or early '09 the IBT tried to draw up an LOA to increase FO pay and give slight increases beyond the topped out five year mark. WH literally laughed.

Flash forward to '12 and the Company can't fill seats because of that same laughable pay, but now WH/BB are all concerned about our FO's financial wellbeing.

Not being able to attract new hires because of the crappy contract is one of the few pieces of leverage we have. As someone sitting at the 36.62 mark, I will grudgingly sit at this pay rate a bit longer in an effort to fix some of the QoL items in our contract for everyone (and in the long term, myself even after I upgrade). Slightly more pay without fixing such items as cancellation pay, minimum duty day, and real overtime pay are useless.

These QoL/ softpay issues are going to be even more important when the new rest and duty rules go into effect as the schedules are likely to become much more unproductive.
I do not disagree with what you are saying, but if the company is willing to give the FO's a pay increase(which they did about 6 months ago) knowing that you are underpaid, WITHOUT having to give anything up then you should have taken it! You would be here now with a $5 dollar hour increase at the same juncture.
You would be $5 dollars an hour richer and you will most likely vote no on this LBFO where QOL, cancellation pay, minimum duty day and overtime pay are concerned.

Last edited by Bolo; 03-05-2013 at 05:21 PM.
Reply
Old 03-05-2013 | 06:02 PM
  #90  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: Eff Oh Won Fo Fife
Default

Originally Posted by Bolo
...but if the company is willing to give the FO's a pay increase(which they did about 6 months ago) knowing that you are underpaid, WITHOUT having to give anything up then you should have taken it!
But, we do believe we would be giving up something by allowing the Company to only increase FO pay to attract new hires...bargaining leverage. The inability to attract new hires is one of the few things keeping WH at the table.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Aileron
Part 135
333
07-30-2009 05:39 PM
Boogie Nights
Union Talk
22
04-14-2009 09:10 PM
1515greenlight
Regional
5
04-08-2009 01:37 PM
Beagle_Lover
Atlas/Polar
10
06-03-2008 07:53 AM
CE750
Major
103
03-29-2008 05:32 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices