Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

ATP mins and Regionals

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-12-2013 | 08:11 AM
  #21  
snippercr's Avatar
Does NOT get weekends off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 0
From: ERJ - 145
Default

Originally Posted by Jet87
SkyWest is not having problems filling their classes, in my opinion we are getting ahead of ourselves with the regionals having problems hiring "thing" by a year or two.
Good. Just like a 3rd party candidate, the more that go to Skywest, the fewer the Republic has.
Reply
Old 08-12-2013 | 08:32 AM
  #22  
block30's Avatar
Bracing for Fallacies
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,543
Likes: 0
From: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
Default

Originally Posted by capto
1500 hours for EVERYONE!!! I have flown plenty with aviation majors, some who believed themselves to be rocket scientists. Many I could not trust with the most basic of tasks, some of these guys could not fly a kite on their own; of course as in everything there are exemptions. some were very very sharp. Also have flown with low time non aviation majors who did very good consistently. We all know that the only reason this was watered down was because of lobbyist paid for by these universities to favor a few who in many cases are not more qualified than a monkey. However they are going to need all the help they can get to live off a 25,000 yr salary after their parents paid over 100,000 to get them there shinny jet syndrome will fade away very quickly.

-1500 hrs for EVERYONE or 1000 for ALL!
-only exemption I agree with is that for military aviators
Yeah, I don't blame you for feeling that way. As much as I wanted to see higher than 250 hour minimums, I am still pleased with the 1250, 1000, 750 hour considerations. Structured training is important---I have certainly seen that which is not! Shoot, I have seen that which claimed to be, but was not really that structured.

Nonetheless, with the education industry becoming the juggernaut that it is, I was truly afraid the big flight schools would get exempted down to 250. No matter how good the instructor, school, syllabus, training environment, and so on, there will be lessons not learned, lessons forgotten, etc. The actual flight experience fine tunes the education, matures and humbles the pilot.
Reply
Old 08-12-2013 | 07:52 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 620
Likes: 0
Default

A lot of people may not agree with what was the final outcome of this ruling & I know it will not be fair to a lot of folks, but in the end, it is what it is.

Big Money won, once again.... But what surprises me is that RAA did not win, rather the schools & universities won....

But, I am a glass half full person, so the way I see this, it could have been a lot worse..

Let's face the reality, For 121 purpose, ATP is the NEW Commercial now.

Some people used to get the commercial at 200, some at 250, some took even longer.

Now, same goes for ATP, some will get it at 1000, others at 1200 & the rest at 1500....
Reply
Old 08-12-2013 | 08:12 PM
  #24  
DryMotorBoatin's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 0
From: Seat 0B
Default

Sadly though there are unintended consequences. This is another nail in the coffin of the well experienced mom and pop independent part 61 CFI. Now even more pilots will be trained at the university level by a freshly minted CFI.
Reply
Old 08-12-2013 | 08:22 PM
  #25  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Default

So true, working at one of these mom and pop, 61/141 small schools. It's hard to get CFI's these days and we have absolutely zero students wanting or training for pilot careers. We have a couple commercial guys but only for the ratings nothing more. Docs and older students wanting to check off a bucket list item and we do alot of VA just using there gov. money for same reason.
Reply
Old 08-12-2013 | 08:46 PM
  #26  
block30's Avatar
Bracing for Fallacies
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,543
Likes: 0
From: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
Default

Originally Posted by DryMotorBoatin
Sadly though there are unintended consequences. This is another nail in the coffin of the well experienced mom and pop independent part 61 CFI. Now even more pilots will be trained at the university level by a freshly minted CFI.
One thing I think will be an improvement is that flight instructors will have to stick around for more than two weeks. Unlike back in the '07 era when flight schools got absolutely decimated of experience in very short order. The damage that does to a flight school can take years to rebuild, believe me, I know!
Reply
Old 08-12-2013 | 08:51 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
From: CFI/II/MEI
Default

Originally Posted by BaronRouge380
Question I raised wasn't to debate "degree" vs "non degree" but "2 year Aviation degree" vs "Engineering degree" in general. The lobbyists have the answer!
Yeah, I have an engineering degree and instruct at one of these universities that will likely get the exemption soon. How does it make any sense that I'm qualified to teach a commercial ground school class and instruct in the airplane for students that will qualify for the exemption, but I can't qualify myself lol? And a year ago everyone would carry on about how useless and what a joke a degree in aviation is...

I'm of the opinion that it should be either 1000 for everyone or 1500 for everyone. The military exemption is OK, because their training is miles above any part 141 or 61 school, and they get qual'd right into heavy and/or high performance equipment. Also, the only military aviators that would likely even need to take advantage of the rule are the occasional guard/reserve pilot.
Reply
Old 08-12-2013 | 09:25 PM
  #28  
hypoxia's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by bcpilot
Let's face the reality, For 121 purpose, ATP is the NEW Commercial now.

Some people used to get the commercial at 200, some at 250, some took even longer.

Now, same goes for ATP, some will get it at 1000, others at 1200 & the rest at 1500....
No, it's not the same! It's a RESTRICTED ATP! In my opinion having restricted written all over your license is worse than a Commercial ticket! Next accident, mark my words, the lawyers will have a Hay Day with this! It's a total liability for Airlines to hire pilots with RESTRICTED written on their ticket! I don't care what kind of bullsh!t frosting the FAA, Colleges or the Airlines put on it, it's simply an inferior "restricted" license and it implies something less than the professional Airline Transport Pilot or Commercial Pilot for that matter! The fact is, one is either an ATP or one is not!

Last edited by hypoxia; 08-12-2013 at 09:36 PM.
Reply
Old 08-12-2013 | 11:03 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Default

They definitely could have come up with a better name for it. Like "ATP- Second In Command" or "ATP- SIC Privileges Only for Part 121"
Reply
Old 08-13-2013 | 05:36 AM
  #30  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Default

Doesn't it only say "restricted" until the pilot gets 1500 hrs and then it gets replaced with a regular ATP?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AirTahoe
Regional
24
03-27-2008 06:12 PM
On Autopilot
Regional
46
12-03-2007 06:49 PM
oldveedubs
Flight Schools and Training
12
05-09-2007 08:30 PM
DrPepper
Regional
9
03-17-2007 10:33 AM
CTPILOT
Regional
10
10-08-2006 06:41 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices