Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

FAR 117 Effect

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-27-2013 | 11:27 AM
  #31  
Thunderpig's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
From: Retired Mil...ready to start the grind
Default

Originally Posted by KSCessnaDriver
Surely you can't be serious. Or perhaps you really do believe a non-spiritual person can't be a pilot in your eyes. Either way, this post is way off base
Sarcasm...it's such a lost art...
Reply
Old 08-27-2013 | 11:54 AM
  #32  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: Musical Chairs
Default FAR 117 Effect

If the company wants to take the "conservative route" and require pilots to be in domicile 10 hours prior to duty or forbid pilots from commuting altogether, then I have the solution: HOME BASING!!!! Lots of deadheading but it would fix fatigue issues entirely. (I realize it would never happen but one can dream, right?)
Reply
Old 08-27-2013 | 12:30 PM
  #33  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 1
From: the right side
Default

Originally Posted by Thunderpig
Sarcasm...it's such a lost art...
I was hoping it was but there are certain ways to display sarcasm, none of which caught my eye.
Reply
Old 08-27-2013 | 01:25 PM
  #34  
DryMotorBoatin's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 0
From: Seat 0B
Default

Originally Posted by KSCessnaDriver
I was hoping it was but there are certain ways to display sarcasm, none of which caught my eye.
You seriously think I think a company/Feds should make exercise mandatory? A regulated/monitored diet? Insist on religion? I don't think I could have been more insanely over the top if I tried. Yet you couldn't tell if I was serious or not? Whew.
Reply
Old 08-27-2013 | 01:44 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by twebb
I think they need to define sleep opportunity.

If you need to have access to Suitable accommodations or an Rest Facility 10 hours prior to accepting an assignment, then no commuting before a flight.

When jumpseating or riding in the back you don't have;

Rest facility means a bunk or seat accommodation installed in an aircraft that provides a flightcrew member with a sleep opportunity.
or
Suitable accommodation means a temperature-controlled facility with sound mitigation and the ability to control light that provides a flightcrew member with the ability to sleep either in a bed, bunk or in a chair that allows for flat or near flat sleeping position. Suitable accommodation only applies to ground facilities and does not apply to aircraft onboard rest facilities.


I guess boeing is confused too...

"Boeing stated it has concerns about the use of the
phrase “sleep opportunity”
in
the definition. It noted that it considers a “slee
p opportunity” to be a period of time
during which sleep or rest can feasibly occur. Boe
ing suggested that the definition be
revised to read: “Rest facility means a bunk, seat,
room, or other accommodation that
provides a flightcrew member with comfort and quiet
so as to maximize sleep and rest
within a sleep opportunity period."
Like many others have said here, this rule only applies to crew members while they are on duty/on company time. Commuting typically happens on your off days and this rule says nothing about what the company can do with your off days.

also, It specifically says that their definition only applies to ground facilities. Therefore implying that the current definition/rules for wide body "bunks"...etc. will continue or they will specify a new definition/rules, so i'm sure boeing will be fine
Reply
Old 08-27-2013 | 02:27 PM
  #36  
twebb's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
From: CE-650
Default

Originally Posted by grahamlax
Therefore implying that the current definition/rules for wide body "bunks"...etc. will continue or they will specify a new definition/rules, so i'm sure boeing will be fine

The reg has 3 categories for bunks and rest on the plane. Away from passengers or seats that recline so far back.
Reply
Old 08-27-2013 | 06:46 PM
  #37  
New Hire
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by twebb
I think they need to define sleep opportunity.

If you need to have access to Suitable accommodations or an Rest Facility 10 hours prior to accepting an assignment, then no commuting before a flight.

When jumpseating or riding in the back you don't have;

Rest facility means a bunk or seat accommodation installed in an aircraft that provides a flightcrew member with a sleep opportunity.
or
Suitable accommodation means a temperature-controlled facility with sound mitigation and the ability to control light that provides a flightcrew member with the ability to sleep either in a bed, bunk or in a chair that allows for flat or near flat sleeping position. Suitable accommodation only applies to ground facilities and does not apply to aircraft onboard rest facilities.


I guess boeing is confused too...

"Boeing stated it has concerns about the use of the
phrase “sleep opportunity”
in
the definition. It noted that it considers a “slee
p opportunity” to be a period of time
during which sleep or rest can feasibly occur. Boe
ing suggested that the definition be
revised to read: “Rest facility means a bunk, seat,
room, or other accommodation that
provides a flightcrew member with comfort and quiet
so as to maximize sleep and rest
within a sleep opportunity period."
You're overthinking it. This doesn't regulate commuting in any way. If that were true, time spent driving in a car in base in that 10 hour window would be illegal as well as you wouldn't have access to suitable accommodations.
Reply
Old 08-27-2013 | 07:03 PM
  #38  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by twebb
I think they need to define sleep opportunity.

If you need to have access to Suitable accommodations or an Rest Facility 10 hours prior to accepting an assignment, then no commuting before a flight.

When jumpseating or riding in the back you don't have;

Rest facility means a bunk or seat accommodation installed in an aircraft that provides a flightcrew member with a sleep opportunity.
or
Suitable accommodation means a temperature-controlled facility with sound mitigation and the ability to control light that provides a flightcrew member with the ability to sleep either in a bed, bunk or in a chair that allows for flat or near flat sleeping position. Suitable accommodation only applies to ground facilities and does not apply to aircraft onboard rest facilities.


I guess boeing is confused too...

"Boeing stated it has concerns about the use of the
phrase “sleep opportunity”
in
the definition. It noted that it considers a “slee
p opportunity” to be a period of time
during which sleep or rest can feasibly occur. Boe
ing suggested that the definition be
revised to read: “Rest facility means a bunk, seat,
room, or other accommodation that
provides a flightcrew member with comfort and quiet
so as to maximize sleep and rest
within a sleep opportunity period."
Unless you live in the crew room, everyone commutes to work.
Reply
Old 08-27-2013 | 07:57 PM
  #39  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 170
Likes: 14
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
Unless you live in the crew room, everyone commutes to work.
And what about those of us who do live in a crew room? I'll admit it was awkward telling the company my new permanent residence was the airport, but it was even harder trying to say I was late once because of traffic...
Reply
Old 08-27-2013 | 08:06 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Around123
Looks Like same day commutes are over. Some crash pads will not be Suitable accommodations. What are you going to do? Move to base or use more of your time to commute?
Crash pads or the crew room could count.

A layover facility could be a suitable
accommodation if it meets the
definition of suitable accommodation
set out in § 117.3. A room that has
multiple reclining chairs with multiple
individuals resting could also be a
suitable accommodation if it meets the
suitable accommodation requirements
of § 117.3. The FAA emphasizes that the
definition of suitable accommodation in
§ 117.3 does not require that access to a
suitable accommodation be limited so
that only one person can use it at any
given time.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mrk771989
Pilot Health
10
03-18-2009 09:23 AM
LR45DRIVER
Regional
14
12-22-2007 08:23 PM
mikefly
Regional
11
12-19-2007 05:06 PM
ryane946
JetBlue
4
03-18-2006 09:43 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices