Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

FAR 117 Effect

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-27-2013, 11:27 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Thunderpig's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: Retired Mil...ready to start the grind
Posts: 249
Default

Originally Posted by KSCessnaDriver View Post
Surely you can't be serious. Or perhaps you really do believe a non-spiritual person can't be a pilot in your eyes. Either way, this post is way off base
Sarcasm...it's such a lost art...
Thunderpig is offline  
Old 08-27-2013, 11:54 AM
  #32  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: Musical Chairs
Posts: 74
Default FAR 117 Effect

If the company wants to take the "conservative route" and require pilots to be in domicile 10 hours prior to duty or forbid pilots from commuting altogether, then I have the solution: HOME BASING!!!! Lots of deadheading but it would fix fatigue issues entirely. (I realize it would never happen but one can dream, right?)
Banja is offline  
Old 08-27-2013, 12:30 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: the right side
Posts: 1,373
Default

Originally Posted by Thunderpig View Post
Sarcasm...it's such a lost art...
I was hoping it was but there are certain ways to display sarcasm, none of which caught my eye.
KSCessnaDriver is offline  
Old 08-27-2013, 01:25 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DryMotorBoatin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: Seat 0B
Posts: 1,214
Default

Originally Posted by KSCessnaDriver View Post
I was hoping it was but there are certain ways to display sarcasm, none of which caught my eye.
You seriously think I think a company/Feds should make exercise mandatory? A regulated/monitored diet? Insist on religion? I don't think I could have been more insanely over the top if I tried. Yet you couldn't tell if I was serious or not? Whew.
DryMotorBoatin is offline  
Old 08-27-2013, 01:44 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 121
Default

Originally Posted by twebb View Post
I think they need to define sleep opportunity.

If you need to have access to Suitable accommodations or an Rest Facility 10 hours prior to accepting an assignment, then no commuting before a flight.

When jumpseating or riding in the back you don't have;

Rest facility means a bunk or seat accommodation installed in an aircraft that provides a flightcrew member with a sleep opportunity.
or
Suitable accommodation means a temperature-controlled facility with sound mitigation and the ability to control light that provides a flightcrew member with the ability to sleep either in a bed, bunk or in a chair that allows for flat or near flat sleeping position. Suitable accommodation only applies to ground facilities and does not apply to aircraft onboard rest facilities.


I guess boeing is confused too...

"Boeing stated it has concerns about the use of the
phrase “sleep opportunity”
in
the definition. It noted that it considers a “slee
p opportunity” to be a period of time
during which sleep or rest can feasibly occur. Boe
ing suggested that the definition be
revised to read: “Rest facility means a bunk, seat,
room, or other accommodation that
provides a flightcrew member with comfort and quiet
so as to maximize sleep and rest
within a sleep opportunity period."
Like many others have said here, this rule only applies to crew members while they are on duty/on company time. Commuting typically happens on your off days and this rule says nothing about what the company can do with your off days.

also, It specifically says that their definition only applies to ground facilities. Therefore implying that the current definition/rules for wide body "bunks"...etc. will continue or they will specify a new definition/rules, so i'm sure boeing will be fine
grahamlax is offline  
Old 08-27-2013, 02:27 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
twebb's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: CE-650
Posts: 397
Default

Originally Posted by grahamlax View Post
Therefore implying that the current definition/rules for wide body "bunks"...etc. will continue or they will specify a new definition/rules, so i'm sure boeing will be fine

The reg has 3 categories for bunks and rest on the plane. Away from passengers or seats that recline so far back.
twebb is offline  
Old 08-27-2013, 06:46 PM
  #37  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Posts: 5
Default

Originally Posted by twebb View Post
I think they need to define sleep opportunity.

If you need to have access to Suitable accommodations or an Rest Facility 10 hours prior to accepting an assignment, then no commuting before a flight.

When jumpseating or riding in the back you don't have;

Rest facility means a bunk or seat accommodation installed in an aircraft that provides a flightcrew member with a sleep opportunity.
or
Suitable accommodation means a temperature-controlled facility with sound mitigation and the ability to control light that provides a flightcrew member with the ability to sleep either in a bed, bunk or in a chair that allows for flat or near flat sleeping position. Suitable accommodation only applies to ground facilities and does not apply to aircraft onboard rest facilities.


I guess boeing is confused too...

"Boeing stated it has concerns about the use of the
phrase “sleep opportunity”
in
the definition. It noted that it considers a “slee
p opportunity” to be a period of time
during which sleep or rest can feasibly occur. Boe
ing suggested that the definition be
revised to read: “Rest facility means a bunk, seat,
room, or other accommodation that
provides a flightcrew member with comfort and quiet
so as to maximize sleep and rest
within a sleep opportunity period."
You're overthinking it. This doesn't regulate commuting in any way. If that were true, time spent driving in a car in base in that 10 hour window would be illegal as well as you wouldn't have access to suitable accommodations.
citabria589 is offline  
Old 08-27-2013, 07:03 PM
  #38  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Default

Originally Posted by twebb View Post
I think they need to define sleep opportunity.

If you need to have access to Suitable accommodations or an Rest Facility 10 hours prior to accepting an assignment, then no commuting before a flight.

When jumpseating or riding in the back you don't have;

Rest facility means a bunk or seat accommodation installed in an aircraft that provides a flightcrew member with a sleep opportunity.
or
Suitable accommodation means a temperature-controlled facility with sound mitigation and the ability to control light that provides a flightcrew member with the ability to sleep either in a bed, bunk or in a chair that allows for flat or near flat sleeping position. Suitable accommodation only applies to ground facilities and does not apply to aircraft onboard rest facilities.


I guess boeing is confused too...

"Boeing stated it has concerns about the use of the
phrase “sleep opportunity”
in
the definition. It noted that it considers a “slee
p opportunity” to be a period of time
during which sleep or rest can feasibly occur. Boe
ing suggested that the definition be
revised to read: “Rest facility means a bunk, seat,
room, or other accommodation that
provides a flightcrew member with comfort and quiet
so as to maximize sleep and rest
within a sleep opportunity period."
Unless you live in the crew room, everyone commutes to work.
Nevets is offline  
Old 08-27-2013, 07:57 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Posts: 125
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets View Post
Unless you live in the crew room, everyone commutes to work.
And what about those of us who do live in a crew room? I'll admit it was awkward telling the company my new permanent residence was the airport, but it was even harder trying to say I was late once because of traffic...
BenS is offline  
Old 08-27-2013, 08:06 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 389
Default

Originally Posted by Around123 View Post
Looks Like same day commutes are over. Some crash pads will not be Suitable accommodations. What are you going to do? Move to base or use more of your time to commute?
Crash pads or the crew room could count.

A layover facility could be a suitable
accommodation if it meets the
definition of suitable accommodation
set out in § 117.3. A room that has
multiple reclining chairs with multiple
individuals resting could also be a
suitable accommodation if it meets the
suitable accommodation requirements
of § 117.3. The FAA emphasizes that the
definition of suitable accommodation in
§ 117.3 does not require that access to a
suitable accommodation be limited so
that only one person can use it at any
given time.
IDIOTPILOT is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mrk771989
Pilot Health
10
03-18-2009 09:23 AM
LR45DRIVER
Regional
14
12-22-2007 08:23 PM
mikefly
Regional
11
12-19-2007 05:06 PM
ryane946
JetBlue
4
03-18-2006 09:43 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices