Regional Pilots should sue ALPA too
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: Just another RJ guy
Posts: 906
There's a point where it become the principle of it all.
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: B737 CA
Posts: 1,518
You're telling me that every single member of the ALPA BOD is in lockstep with Moak and, if they vote him out, will replace him with someone who believes in the same philosophy? If that were true, I would say the vast majority of airline pilots must believe the same way, since they obviously only elect reps who believe the same way. In which case ALPA or non-ALPA wouldn't make any difference whatsoever.
#24
Bracing for Fallacies
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
Posts: 3,543
Thank you Adler, 80kts, Junglebus, and PCL128. I am quite frustrated and baffled at the regional concessions wave, but I think you all bring up good points. It is easy to fall into a mob mentality at this time.
#25
You're telling me that every single member of the ALPA BOD is in lockstep with Moak and, if they vote him out, will replace him with someone who believes in the same philosophy? If that were true, I would say the vast majority of airline pilots must believe the same way, since they obviously only elect reps who believe the same way. In which case ALPA or non-ALPA wouldn't make any difference whatsoever.
#26
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: Just another RJ guy
Posts: 906
Every ALPA president since Babbitt and after has been the same. Moak however has been particularly bad (what do you expect when you elect an ex-mil DAL pilot?). So I have zero confidence that the BOD will see the light. As a BOD member who has voted in two elections, I'm here to tell you that unless you've been in the plenary session and ran the hospitality suites, you have no idea what the politics are like.
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,648
ALPA actively encourages the whipsaw at the regional level by signing off on concessionary deals to undercut fellow ALPA pilot groups. What is the point of a union if it's not UNIFIED.
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: B737 CA
Posts: 1,518
edit: or maybe I misunderstood & it was a cheap shot, I see you two have been going at it in other threads.
#30
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 208
Yes. It is stupid to have the same union represent mainline pilots and the regional pilots who fly as contractors for the same mainline. Their interests and careers are completely at odds. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to come to that conclusion. So, I ask you:
Who came first? If you look back far enough, which ALPA represented airlines do you see in the history books? Delta? United? or was it Air Wisconsin, Expressjet and Mesa? Do the pilots at an airline vote in a union or does the union force themselves on the pilots?
Who took the crappy stepping stone job hoping to get to the mainline job? You're now going to sue the union YOU voted to represent you because you expected unrealistic results?
Any idiot can see the interests of mainline ALPA and regional ALPA are at odds. Who should be responsible for recognizing that reality and voting down a union who can't adequately represent their pilot group? You (the one with the vote) or the union you ASKED to do the job?
If ALPA had turned your pilot group down for representation on the grounds of conflict of interest, you'd probably be whining for a lawsuit because they refused to represent you. Typical.
Who came first? If you look back far enough, which ALPA represented airlines do you see in the history books? Delta? United? or was it Air Wisconsin, Expressjet and Mesa? Do the pilots at an airline vote in a union or does the union force themselves on the pilots?
Who took the crappy stepping stone job hoping to get to the mainline job? You're now going to sue the union YOU voted to represent you because you expected unrealistic results?
Any idiot can see the interests of mainline ALPA and regional ALPA are at odds. Who should be responsible for recognizing that reality and voting down a union who can't adequately represent their pilot group? You (the one with the vote) or the union you ASKED to do the job?
If ALPA had turned your pilot group down for representation on the grounds of conflict of interest, you'd probably be whining for a lawsuit because they refused to represent you. Typical.
After all, if they charge us for a service and fail to provide in good faith, and if careers and paychecks are affected, wouldn't there be a case? There apparently was for TWA pilots.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 10:33 AM