Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Eagle AIP

Old 02-01-2014 | 07:02 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by unclenobby
Your assumption that you need to pay employees less to see more return is over simplified. Plus the fact that most people who own the stock probably don't even realize it, they are just part of a large pension or mutual fund.

The truth is an employee is as much or more of a stake holder in the company than a shareholder of the company. Concessions is just for the largest singular shareholders (top level brass) to cash in on their stock, options etc. All the folks invested via large funds will see pennies if that. It's a wealth transfer plain and simple.
No, I never said they need to pay less to see better returns. But it does add to the bottom line. Pilot compensation is a very small piece of company expenses. I never once implied pilots or other employee groups should take cuts to buy planes. But to say they don't have fiduciary responsibility is not understanding the meaning of it.

Secondly, regarding public vs. private:

American Airlines Group Inc - AAL - Stock Quotes

"American Airlines Group Inc., formerly AMR Corporation, operates in the airline industry. The Company's principal subsidiary is American Airlines, Inc. (American). As of December 31, 2011, American provided scheduled jet service to approximately 160 destinations throughout North America, the Caribbean, Latin America, Europe and Asia. AMR Eagle Holding Corporation (AMR Eagle), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, owns two regional airlines, which do business as American Eagle-American Eagle Airlines, Inc. and Executive Airlines, Inc. (collectively, the American Eagle carriers). American also contracts with an independently owned regional airline, which does business as AmericanConnection (the AmericanConnection carrier). As of December 31, 2011, AMR Eagle operated approximately 1,500 daily departures, offering scheduled passenger service to over 175 destinations in North America, Mexico and the Caribbean."
Reply
Old 02-01-2014 | 07:10 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 0
From: SFO Guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by Hurryage65
Your going to get the planes your going to get no matter what! Vote no! Let's change this industry around
Management is not going to make a decision based on $100s of millions, for a contract that is only going to save them a couple of million dollars. The airplanes will go to whomever Management has already decided to give them to. Stay the course, don't give in!!!! Don't cut the legs out from underneath our XJT/ASA brothers and sisters!!!!
Reply
Old 02-01-2014 | 10:11 AM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DashTrash
Management is not going to make a decision based on $100s of millions, for a contract that is only going to save them a couple of million dollars. The airplanes will go to whomever Management has already decided to give them to. Stay the course, don't give in!!!! Don't cut the legs out from underneath our XJT/ASA brothers and sisters!!!!
THIS. I actually don't blame management one bit for asking for givebacks. If you have are dealing with a cadre of saps and pushovers who are salivating over mini 737s, why not see what you can get?

VOTE NO
Reply
Old 02-01-2014 | 10:18 AM
  #44  
texaspilot76's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 0
From: Right Seat
Default

Originally Posted by SpreadEagle
The order for the E jet was started at the end of this last summer and has almost been completely finalized. The rumor is that the final contract language is being delayed so as to attach actual 175 serial numbers promised by AAG to the agreement. In the event Eagle rejects the offer and AAG is unable to farm the flying out to another regional, or another FFD carrier is unable to offer their own 175s or staff new 175s courtesy of AAG... the remainder of the aircraft options are convertible to E-190/5s and could be delivered without interruption and on schedule to the new AAG. These would fall into the group 1 classification defined in the new section 3 at the new AAG.
I hope this is true and you all vote this down. A 190 mainline order is better than a regional 175 order. We need to get the flying back to mainline. Vote it down, then you can come to mainline to fly the 190.
Reply
Old 02-01-2014 | 11:59 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by texaspilot76
I hope this is true and you all vote this down. A 190 mainline order is better than a regional 175 order. We need to get the flying back to mainline. Vote it down, then you can come to mainline to fly the 190.
Yeah it's so easy to get a job at a mainline why doesn't everyone do that?
Reply
Old 02-01-2014 | 12:01 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: emb-145 ca
Default

Originally Posted by texaspilot76
I hope this is true and you all vote this down. A 190 mainline order is better than a regional 175 order. We need to get the flying back to mainline. Vote it down, then you can come to mainline to fly the 190.
Yeah, your job is just sitting there waiting for you at AA. And AA management is going to have all the Envoy guys step right to the front of the line after refusing these concessions... ??

We all know this is probably the best direction for the future value of all careers, but the pathway is the problem. No one has the pathway figured out, and management wants to make us all pay for it. So the big jets are coming, but how is career improvement going to come with them?
Reply
Old 02-01-2014 | 01:18 PM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,707
Likes: 0
Default

what a texasjerk, must be on the bottom of reserve.
Reply
Old 02-01-2014 | 03:49 PM
  #48  
texaspilot76's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 0
From: Right Seat
Default

Originally Posted by CaptainNameless
Yeah, your job is just sitting there waiting for you at AA. And AA management is going to have all the Envoy guys step right to the front of the line after refusing these concessions... ??

We all know this is probably the best direction for the future value of all careers, but the pathway is the problem. No one has the pathway figured out, and management wants to make us all pay for it. So the big jets are coming, but how is career improvement going to come with them?
No worries. With all the retirements kicking in and Delta, United, SW, Spirit, etc. hiring, then there will be a place for you to go even if AA blacklists you.
Reply
Old 02-01-2014 | 07:13 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by texaspilot76
No worries. With all the retirements kicking in and Delta, United, SW, Spirit, etc. hiring, then there will be a place for you to go even if AA blacklists you.
I doubt AA will blacklist anyone. GoJet pilots get hired, Mesa, Trans States, etc. The only airline that may blackball you is Hawaiian and that's if you fly for Go!

Edit: I also find it funny you even bring up such a notion. If we vote this in AA will be so mad they'll never hire us but on the flip side if we vote no and we're on the street APA won't be riding in to save the day and offer us all jobs.
Reply
Old 02-02-2014 | 12:11 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,035
Likes: 0
Cool

Originally Posted by SkylineAviation
You think I'm advocating this contract, or think I agree? I'm simply putting out information that came directly from the shot callers.

I think the whole thing stinks but at the same time everyone needs to be well informed. You can not deny that management has fiduciary responsibility. If not they go to jail (i.e. Enron). And yes, they prey on that but it's not only limited to airlines, it's corporate america.

Vote yes, vote no...make a move and stick to it. But at least know the facts in a rational way. Try to think as others around you do and then you can know others motives and next move. It's a great negotiating tactic that management has mastered and we're just trying to play catch-up.


What are you smoking? No management on the planet has ever gone to jail "(i.e. Enron)" for not forcing paycuts down their employees throats! Seriously, fiduciary duty to cut the pay of employees of a hugely profitable company with multiple billions in the bank???

The Enron debacle had NOTHING to do with paycuts for employees...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
35
03-13-2016 04:38 AM
Pilot7
Hiring News
36
02-15-2014 12:07 PM
Pilot7
Regional
102
07-10-2013 08:45 PM
bernoulli1129
Hiring News
2
03-23-2013 10:18 AM
Lbell911
Regional
18
11-26-2007 11:56 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices