Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Eagle TA- What did you vote? >

Eagle TA- What did you vote?

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines
View Poll Results: My vote on the TA was...
YES
47
24.48%
NO
90
46.88%
Did not vote
55
28.65%
Voters: 192. You may not vote on this poll

Eagle TA- What did you vote?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-20-2014 | 10:59 AM
  #141  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,041
Likes: 0
From: GV Captain
Default

If they aren't following our CURRENT contract, what makes you think they will follow the new one?

Vote NO.
Reply
Old 03-20-2014 | 11:11 AM
  #142  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Waitingformins
I really am sympathetic to your story.
Eagle will shrink anyway; when you add planes that are 50% larger you will either have 50% growth in seat sales or shrink the fleet and thus pilots. With that said bigger ships equals lees frequency, less turns and possibly better schedules. If you fight for your Qol you will have a better Qol it didn’t magically happen at the majors they fought for it, you seem to put all your stock in the winning lottery ticket. If Eagle can get off its heels of concessions than you can position yourself for more days off per month higher vacation accrual or more long call reserves spots, even if pay is not your priority. There is no bust in 5 years. 5 years from now you will be 5 years older still need to provide for your family be further down the same road, and it will be even harder to switch professions. There is no magical opportunity; if you want a better life you must build a better life. The company is not forcing concessions they are offering them, the pilots choose what they live with.


If the company wants pay caps why can’t they give you a seniority number now? Then you could work under you cap not costing them a dime extra until you can hold the 777 if you wanted to. If they want to create flow for new hires they will. They do not need permission to hire their own employees so why should you buy a “guarantee”.
The 5 year cap is so I don't get stuck in a career I hate for the rest of my life. The regionals were never meant to be a career and I'll be damned if I make them one for myself.

As to fighting for better work rules, qol, etc. at the regionals it's not going to happen. It's a dying business model regardless, but it's built on cheap labor to undercut mainline pilot groups. Supply and demand is finally coming into play, and it's far more powerful than any contract we or the company can come up with. Pay will increase as these companies attempt to attract new hires until it reaches a point at which it is no longer financially advantageous to contract out. Flying will go back to mainline and hopefully there will be more jobs, not just less frequency.

In the meantime I want a safety net flow for my 5 years remaining of regional flow and the longer flights done by 175s may give me better schedules.
Reply
Old 03-20-2014 | 11:14 AM
  #143  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,035
Likes: 0
Cool

Originally Posted by SkylineAviation
That may be so, but the same would apply to any contract with any language. It goes both ways.

If such an event would happen with the current contract, what prohibits them from taking us back into BK. They could then do as they please, renegotiate and file a 1013. Regardless of the profits being shown today by airlines, they could evaporate tomorrow if any catastrophic event happens and back into bankruptcy they go.

In my opinion the whole notion of 'what if this' and 'what if that' is moot. It makes no difference and any decision making should be made on the current facts and the TA in itself, without trying to predict WWIII or oil spikes. The whole game changes then with this contract or that.

Vote no, vote yes, I don't really care. But don't try to predict the best or worse possible scenario because it usually is never one or another.


If you really "don't care", why is it you seem to keep cheerleading for yes votes?
Reply
Old 03-20-2014 | 11:17 AM
  #144  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,035
Likes: 0
Question

Originally Posted by Bzzt
The 5 year cap is so I don't get stuck in a career I hate for the rest of my life. The regionals were never meant to be a career and I'll be damned if I make them one for myself.

As to fighting for better work rules, qol, etc. at the regionals it's not going to happen. It's a dying business model regardless, but it's built on cheap labor to undercut mainline pilot groups. Supply and demand is finally coming into play, and it's far more powerful than any contract we or the company can come up with. Pay will increase as these companies attempt to attract new hires until it reaches a point at which it is no longer financially advantageous to contract out. Flying will go back to mainline and hopefully there will be more jobs, not just less frequency.

In the meantime I want a safety net flow for my 5 years remaining of regional flow and the longer flights done by 175s may give me better schedules.


It sounds like you're determined to vote yes to concessions no matter how good the argument is against doing so?
Reply
Old 03-20-2014 | 11:23 AM
  #145  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Paid2fly
It sounds like you're determined to vote yes to concessions no matter how good the argument is against doing so?
There is no argument against it other than emotions and "what if" scenarios that will screw everyone regardless of contract. The only legitimate argument I've seen are guys who won't vote concessions out of principle, I can respect that.

Personally it's not a concessionary deal. I'm not losing anything I care about (pay, industry average adjustments) and I'm gaining something I do want (better flow). Everyone has different priorities so one broad reasoning is not going to work. I'm not telling anyone else what they should do, the thread wants to know how we voted, I voted yes and I gave my reasoning.
Reply
Old 03-20-2014 | 11:24 AM
  #146  
What's Avatar
Underpaid...
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,101
Likes: 0
From: French-Canadian
Default

Originally Posted by Bzzt
The 5 year cap is so I don't get stuck in a career I hate for the rest of my life. The regionals were never meant to be a career and I'll be damned if I make them one for myself.

As to fighting for better work rules, qol, etc. at the regionals it's not going to happen. It's a dying business model regardless, but it's built on cheap labor to undercut mainline pilot groups. Supply and demand is finally coming into play, and it's far more powerful than any contract we or the company can come up with. Pay will increase as these companies attempt to attract new hires until it reaches a point at which it is no longer financially advantageous to contract out. Flying will go back to mainline and hopefully there will be more jobs, not just less frequency.

In the meantime I want a safety net flow for my 5 years remaining of regional flow and the longer flights done by 175s may give me better schedules.
Excuse my ignorance, but if 2 E175s are replacing 3 50 seaters, how would the flights get longer? Or are you referring to E175 flying routes that are occupied by mainline A/C today? So your answer is to give up on QOL as it's not going to happen?
Reply
Old 03-20-2014 | 11:30 AM
  #147  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Paid2fly
If you really "don't care", why is it you seem to keep cheerleading for yes votes?
"keep cheerleading"? This was the first time I've even posted since this TA came out. Sorry I pointed out a rational remark that might go against your beliefs. I forgot that this is not a place for reasonable discussions or comments without being labeled or put down.

I can see both sides to ANY argument and could have just as easily pointed out facts for or against. I was simply trying to make a point or cause some thought that might not have been considered. Just because I pointed out facts or questioned someone automatically makes me a "cheerleader."

I can assure you, and if I were to ever fly with you or be around you, I will be just fine with either a yes or no, and won't whine about it. I'll be happy just to have this over with either way.
Reply
Old 03-20-2014 | 11:38 AM
  #148  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by What
Excuse my ignorance, but if 2 E175s are replacing 3 50 seaters, how would the flights get longer? Or are you referring to E175 flying routes that are occupied by mainline A/C today? So your answer is to give up on QOL as it's not going to happen?
Cities which cannot reasonably support airline service are going to be getting cut, whether it's frequency or all together. 175s won't be taking mainline flying, there are simply not enough regional pilots to cover what we already have plus additional mainline flying.

I am referring to flying the longer routes we've recently lost to Republic, and dropping a good amount of the 45 minute flying which they cram in and make our lines utter garbage.
Reply
Old 03-20-2014 | 11:46 AM
  #149  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,035
Likes: 0
Question

Originally Posted by SkylineAviation
"keep cheerleading"? This was the first time I've even posted since this TA came out. Sorry I pointed out a rational remark that might go against your beliefs. I forgot that this is not a place for reasonable discussions or comments without being labeled or put down.

I can see both sides to ANY argument and could have just as easily pointed out facts for or against. I was simply trying to make a point or cause some thought that might not have been considered. Just because I pointed out facts or questioned someone automatically makes me a "cheerleader."

I can assure you, and if I were to ever fly with you or be around you, I will be just fine with either a yes or no, and won't whine about it. I'll be happy just to have this over with either way.


I was just asking what I considered to be a reasonable question, not attacking you. I just really have a hard time understanding how you, or any other pilot(Bzzt, etc.) could even consider taking any concessions... I don't see how it's possible that everyone in this profession aren't so sick and tired of sliding backwards that they finally wake up and take a stand against any further concessions and just vote NO! Regionals are canceling flights and pulling aircraft and routes due to the inability to staff. Commutair just got offered large raises with increased benefits including paid hotels in base for commuters. If now is not the time to stop the slide in this profession, then when?
Reply
Old 03-20-2014 | 12:06 PM
  #150  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Paid2fly
I was just asking what I considered to be a reasonable question, not attacking you. I just really have a hard time understanding how you, or any other pilot(Bzzt, etc.) could even consider taking any concessions... I don't see how it's possible that everyone in this profession aren't so sick and tired of sliding backwards that they finally wake up and take a stand against any further concessions and just vote NO! Regionals are canceling flights and pulling aircraft and routes due to the inability to staff. Commutair just got offered large raises with increased benefits including paid hotels in base for commuters. If now is not the time to stop the slide in this profession, then when?
For me, I don't see it as a concession. I'm trading something I don't value much for something I do value. I would not have voted yes if they simply offered concessions with no increased flow and the threat of shutdown. Hope that helps you understand where I'm coming from.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
35
03-13-2016 04:38 AM
fisherman
Regional
11
02-03-2014 05:17 PM
newcfii
Regional
16
01-14-2014 07:32 AM
grasshoppr
Hiring News
19
01-13-2013 10:49 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices