Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Regional: JUMPSEAT WAR NEAR >

Regional: JUMPSEAT WAR NEAR

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Regional: JUMPSEAT WAR NEAR

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-06-2014 | 10:49 AM
  #151  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 18
Default

Originally Posted by Tjr0806
Check the US Airways E-190 rates for a first year FO at US Airways. 3000 per month.
I said a good airline. US Airways... well there's a reason it's not going to be US Airways anymore. Delta Air Lines is the gold standard for airline.

There are LCC's that pay better than US Airways first year pay on the E-190... and oh by the way, why wasn't that fixed with the MOU?
Old 09-06-2014 | 10:53 AM
  #152  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 18
Default

Originally Posted by Lambourne
Pardon me if I don't take your guidance as I don't work for or care what your opinion is of my input. In all appearances you are suffering from the stress of your failed integration with Expressjet. While you don't want to admit it you are well aware of the consequences that are headed your way.

I am very familiar with the cost+ contracts...Why did the XJT MEC just refer to FFD instead of cost+? Why did the UA MEC invite FFD carriers versus COST+? It is because FFD is an acceptable substitution term. Your company is not receiving incentives not because mainline cancels your flights, but because you have schedules built with no FAR117 flexibility, poor maintenance reliability and crews scattered from hub to hub with no reserves for irregular operations. Those are issues with your company making promises to operate X number of flights but being unable to comply.

Do you make your wife call you "captain"? I suspect all of your mail is addressed to "captain" also. I have known plenty of guys like you over the years. The pilots that define themselves by their job are usually the most miserable people to fly with. I have seen it from every seat over the years, captain.....
There is a reason he's still at a regional, and angry that his shiny toys are being taken. There have been hiring cycles in the (20?) years that he's been at ASA.... he obviously chose not to take them.

Well guess what, that is part of the problem. A 12 year scale "fixes" the longevity problem caused by so many folks being there for 12+ years... though it won't be enough until you get all the 12-year+ folks to move on.

Everyone, remember, a contract is more than Section 3... you could give the world's worst contract to a senior pilot group (like Captain Tony's) and they would still be too expensive.

You have to be at a place with defined movement, like Compass.
Old 09-06-2014 | 11:02 AM
  #153  
MatchPoint's Avatar
Rollin'
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
From: AA Airbus
Default

Originally Posted by Tjr0806
Check the US Airways E-190 rates for a first year FO at US Airways. 3000 per month.
friend, you need to recheck your numbers and stop posting that others are wrong when you in fact are the one who's wrong; that's not wise. Our New Hire base rate is 40/hour, not a "fixed" $3000/month. $3000/month was the old Airbus new hire rate whereas the old E190 new hire rate was $42ish/hr. Plus we get paid 85 hours and 24/7 per diem during training and all deadheads pay above guarantee which has caused me to average around 80 hrs/mnth on RSV. So my first year at Airways my total compensation will be just shy of $50,000. Sure it's more at DL and UA but our first year pay will be $68.22 by Jan 1st, 2016. The company wants it and so do we.
Old 09-06-2014 | 11:30 AM
  #154  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MatchPoint
friend, you need to recheck your numbers and stop posting that others are wrong when you in fact are the one who's wrong; that's not wise. Our New Hire base rate is 40/hour, not a "fixed" $3000/month. $3000/month was the old Airbus new hire rate whereas the old E190 new hire rate was $42ish/hr. Plus we get paid 85 hours and 24/7 per diem during training and all deadheads pay above guarantee which has caused me to average around 80 hrs/mnth on RSV. So my first year at Airways my total compensation will be just shy of $50,000. Sure it's more at DL and UA but our first year pay will be $68.22 by Jan 1st, 2016. The company wants it and so do we.
Key words there. The company both mainline and the regionals do not want to pay regional pilots more. Kirby flat out said they want the regionals to be a stepping stone to the majors. Of course they'd rather utilize the money for mainline pilots. It however does not take a rocket scientist to play the system here. I fly 80-85ish hours per month and credit 130-140 with SAP.
Old 09-06-2014 | 11:49 AM
  #155  
MatchPoint's Avatar
Rollin'
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
From: AA Airbus
Default

Originally Posted by Tjr0806
Key words there. The company both mainline and the regionals do not want to pay regional pilots more. Kirby flat out said they want the regionals to be a stepping stone to the majors. Of course they'd rather utilize the money for mainline pilots. It however does not take a rocket scientist to play the system here. I fly 80-85ish hours per month and credit 130-140 with SAP.
Ok so what's your point? Are you justifying why you plan to stay there? You see the regionals are a money losing necessity that's needed to assist in filling the highly profitable mainline ships. Therefore keeping cost down on a losing necessity is a must, that is why the regionals will NEVER be a solid lucrative career.

Regardless I do think they can pay more even with the regionals being positioned as a stepping stone.

The reason why Mgmt. wants first year pay raised from $40 to $68 is because it cost far more to train a pilot and then watch them leave for DL or UA than pay a bit more in order to retain them.
Old 09-06-2014 | 12:04 PM
  #156  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MatchPoint
Ok so what's your point? Are you justifying why you plan to stay there? You see the regionals are a money losing necessity that's needed to assist in filling the highly profitable mainline ships. Therefore keeping cost down on a losing necessity is a must, that is why the regionals will NEVER be a solid lucrative career.

Regardless I do think they can pay more even with the regionals being positioned as a stepping stone.
I don't plan to stay here. No one should plan to stay at a regional which is why a 12 year pay cap shouldn't matter. You shouldn't be here in 12 years. I use the fact of 130-140 hours of credit to justify that every time someone talk about regional pay they want to say$21,600 a year, guarantee no additional flying, no per diem just guarantee. PSA pilots get paid 75 hours guarantee in training plus 24/7 per diem since that was brought up in a previous post. The fact is there are first year FO's here making mid to high 30's and 6-7 year captains making over 120k per year. Everyone wants to down the PSA contract because we have higher ins rates etc therefore it is in there eyes concessionary when they in fact have no clue what they are talking about. Where we did give some to the company in some areas we took some in others
Old 09-06-2014 | 04:29 PM
  #157  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Tjr0806
I don't plan to stay here. No one should plan to stay at a regional which is why a 12 year pay cap shouldn't matter. You shouldn't be here in 12 years.
But WHAT IF you can't get hired at the majors? Believe it or not, there have been times when the majors were not hiring...
Old 09-06-2014 | 04:52 PM
  #158  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by fisherman
But WHAT IF you can't get hired at the majors? Believe it or not, there have been times when the majors were not hiring...
That's when it's time to hang up the wings and go into a different field. A decade is more than enough time for someone with the proper qualifications to move onto a respectable job. The trash left behind simply muck it up for everyone else that wants to move on.
Old 09-06-2014 | 04:58 PM
  #159  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by cencal83406
Well guess what, that is part of the problem. A 12 year scale "fixes" the longevity problem caused by so many folks being there for 12+ years... though it won't be enough until you get all the 12-year+ folks to move on.
wait….didn't I read you say that anyone who has been a Captain for more than 5 years obviously cannot get hired anywhere else? :roll eyes:

so which is it? they are ALL there by choice and a minute number of mainline hiring in the last 15 years, or NONE of them can hack it at a major?
Old 09-06-2014 | 06:40 PM
  #160  
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 97
From: Volleyball Player
Default

Originally Posted by Tjr0806
I don't plan to stay here. No one should plan to stay at a regional
That would make sense if the majors didn't give up so much scope that the regional pilots outnumber the majors. Even when the numbers are just close, that "dream" is simply BS. Everyone can't "move" to majors.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Stetson29
American
81
06-06-2015 02:06 PM
tom11011
Regional
91
09-15-2014 10:46 AM
PilotAnalyst
Regional
18
10-22-2012 01:39 PM
UND_Sioux
Regional
133
02-27-2010 02:21 PM
ryan1234
Hangar Talk
30
11-12-2008 01:44 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices