Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

This will make you mad!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-08-2014, 10:15 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,123
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP View Post
"The pie is only so big" they say...unless you are C-level management, then they simply bake more pie.

Conveniently overlooked by the author (an aviation industry consultant) is the basic economic reality that major airlines have squeezed the margins of their regional capacity lift partners, so that even IF the regional partners wanted to increase pilot compensation as a way to increase recruiting/retention in accordance with Econ 101 theory...they simply cannot afford to as the mainline isn't going to increase the partner's fee in order for the partner to hire and retain their pilot workforce.
Yes but it took two parties to agree to those terms.

The regional model is very simple. They are a staffing agency.

As it is, the lower tier companies are having zero issues attracting pilots because of the fast upgrades and career progression. That is all anyone wants out of the regionals, in the end, except for the top x% lifers.
Name User is offline  
Old 10-08-2014, 10:18 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
skypilot35's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: It's hot out here.
Posts: 615
Default

Who changed my header?
skypilot35 is offline  
Old 10-08-2014, 10:19 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,123
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP View Post
Is that the fault of ALPA National, or ALPA Local pilots at each given airline that ratify CBAs containing such <I hate this effing word> "inequality"?
Definitely a local issue. ALPA National should have guidelines against it, but they can't tell the individual groups how to split up the money.
Name User is offline  
Old 10-08-2014, 11:23 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
skypilot35's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: It's hot out here.
Posts: 615
Default

Originally Posted by Name User View Post
Definitely a local issue. ALPA National should have guidelines against it, but they can't tell the individual groups how to split up the money.
I don't believe it's just a local issue but an industry culture issue. Additionally, I think the current seniority system we operate under is detrimental to every pilot in the industry because it prohibits movement from one carrier to the next. The system works in the favor of management. I cannot think of any other profession where experience is not considered when calculating compensation. If I could argue for one thing it would be a single seniority system across the regional airline industry.

There is no incentive for regional airlines to retain individuals. In fact if we look at Envoy and the 2650 pilots (APC numbers) currently on the payroll, what incentive does AAG management have to keep any of them? If AAG folds Envoy and puts the 2650 pilots on the street I would speculate many would move to another carrier starting at first year pay. AAG contracts out to the lowest bidder and the same pilot that was a 15 year captain making $99 an hour is now a 1st year FO making $22 without the medical / 401K / Dental / etc. This system has to change. There needs to be an incentive for the company to want to keep their pilots and the industry should pay for experienced professionals not some arbitrary date of hire.

Regarding ALPA contributing to the pilot shortage, I think that is nonsense. There is no pilot shortage. I do however hold the opinion that ALPA does not represent the interests of the regional pilot. There is a direct conflict of interest with regard to compensation for pilots at a Major and pilots at a Regional. If the companies contracting out the flying (Delta, United, American) have to pay more for regional pilot labor, then there is less money available for Major pilot labor. I think its that simple and that is why I don't believe ALPA has the regional pilot's best interest in mind (at least monetarily).

I am not sure what the fix is for the problems in OUR industry, but I am certain a good starting point would be the seniority list.
skypilot35 is offline  
Old 10-08-2014, 05:13 PM
  #15  
Living the Dream
 
deltajuliet's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,795
Default

How do we rally every regional pilot group to get behind that? Envoy guys seem like a logical place to start. Others will be supportive, some will be resistant - again, the senior Captains and lifers at non-Envoy regionals. You sort of run into the same problem, guys at the top not willing to give up for guys at the bottom. Logistically and legally it seems like a big nightmare.

The most expeditious way to spearhead it might be an act of legislation, but how do pilots convince Congress, especially while airline management cries bloody murder?
deltajuliet is offline  
Old 10-08-2014, 05:39 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
skypilot35's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: It's hot out here.
Posts: 615
Default

I don't know the answer. Perhaps the first step would be to identify whether or not the majority of regional pilots would be interested in pushing for one seniority list. If the results of whatever polling metric used indicate a positive response then I would imagine a representative group could be formed to hash out the details.
skypilot35 is offline  
Old 10-08-2014, 05:40 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2011
Posts: 382
Default

So why do Virgin America and Skywest have pay scales so similar to their unionized counterparts?
BrewCity is offline  
Old 10-08-2014, 05:44 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
skypilot35's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: It's hot out here.
Posts: 615
Default

Im not sure I understand your question, but I would imagine because there is an industry standard; albeit a poor one at the regional level.
skypilot35 is offline  
Old 10-08-2014, 05:54 PM
  #19  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 89
Default

Sky pilot your solution has on one very big flaw to it, all regionals arnt owned by one entity, so if I'm company x and I do all the right things, hire the right pilots, invest in proper training, pay fairly, basically put out a superior product, why should I want to allow someone that was trained and worked at company y to be able to come in and be on a higher seniority posisitions, then the guy I envested in from day one ? Especially if company y went out of business because of bad disicions ?
Aksleddriver is offline  
Old 10-08-2014, 05:56 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
Default

I always listen the industrial opinions of an obese former male fight attendant. Btw nice fact checking on the claim that ATP minimums changed from 250 hrs to 1500 hrs Mr MIT.
intrepidcv11 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nicholasblonde
Hangar Talk
40
04-24-2010 09:44 AM
JoeyMeatballs
Hangar Talk
11
09-09-2009 03:37 AM
mcartier713
Flight Schools and Training
10
03-25-2009 06:33 AM
JMT21
Major
0
06-21-2007 03:23 PM
RockBottom
Hangar Talk
7
04-27-2006 02:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices