Undermining the profession yet again ?
#81
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
I'm pretty sure it's been said in this thread a number of times that the Envoy MEC is tossing around the idea you expressed in the original post. Doesn't appear anyone is actually denying it.
Then there are numerous other individuals from all sorts of carriers that are in opposition to you and come up with logical well thought out rebuttals to which you reply with the same incoherent rant about the salesmen of Envoy.
The root of the issue is you're upset that Envoy is going to "poach" other 121 carriers by giving them an unfair advantage over non-121 pilots. Are you upset that this hurts military guys? Flight instructors? Astronauts? NO, you're upset because it hurts other regional airlines by leaving them short because they are unable to pay as much as Envoy is offering.
Then there are numerous other individuals from all sorts of carriers that are in opposition to you and come up with logical well thought out rebuttals to which you reply with the same incoherent rant about the salesmen of Envoy.
The root of the issue is you're upset that Envoy is going to "poach" other 121 carriers by giving them an unfair advantage over non-121 pilots. Are you upset that this hurts military guys? Flight instructors? Astronauts? NO, you're upset because it hurts other regional airlines by leaving them short because they are unable to pay as much as Envoy is offering.
It's your future..................good luck. Sounds like you'll need it.
There is no difference between this offer and offering American Airlines pay rates to fly at Envoy. Offering the AA rates will help out the instructors and astronauts as well but it will still "poach" from other 121 carriers as they don't offer the pay to compete. But, you said that is OK for some reason. Why is it OK for Envoy to offer 6 figure salaries to get experienced pilots but not for them to offer money directly for their experience? Either way the other carriers who can't compete will falter and be unable to attract new pilots ultimately resulting in their closure.
Man, I'll never understand the present generation of regional pilots. You guys have a bleak future embracing and rationalizing cannibalism and hopefully yours won't become one of the casualties. If this possible scheme backfires and Envoy becomes the casualty of its own making (just like last time when the MEC fumbled their own drive), you can be sure the same salesmen here will be the ones crying the loudest blaming others for their demise (and almost certainly me, as if one guy on a forum with an opinion could sink an airline
, which they already insinuate).Their captains, both senior and junior will be given either their old captains pay for their new reserve F/O slot at the bottom of someone else's list or lateral street captains slot at airline X ?
Man, you're not thinking this through. There will be winners and losers in both pilots and airlines and you'll be in Vegas at the whim of the house.
#82
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Take a deep breath and try to explain this again because I didn't see any well thought out explanations so far. You are vehemently against this so maybe there is actually something I am missing or you just aren't clearly expressing it the right way.
More pay at one carrier to drive out the carriers who will never pay is a bad thing is what you are saying.
You keep saying it comes to poaching but that logic is flawed since any improvement to a regional airline contract would still attract other regional airline pilots. Tomorrow Great Lakes offers $250,000 contracts. Good or bad?
In a way this deal at Envoy would help to make other airlines more viable. If I go to Skywest and work for a year and just don't like it I can to to Envoy and maintain my pay and hope for a carrier that fits my life better. It gives incentive to NOT go to Envoy since you can just go there whenever you want.
More pay at one carrier to drive out the carriers who will never pay is a bad thing is what you are saying.
You keep saying it comes to poaching but that logic is flawed since any improvement to a regional airline contract would still attract other regional airline pilots. Tomorrow Great Lakes offers $250,000 contracts. Good or bad?
In a way this deal at Envoy would help to make other airlines more viable. If I go to Skywest and work for a year and just don't like it I can to to Envoy and maintain my pay and hope for a carrier that fits my life better. It gives incentive to NOT go to Envoy since you can just go there whenever you want.
#83
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
So, it's just that you don't believe the company will hire former Captains because the cost is too high and they will be left out in the cold. Hence losers.
But wouldn't those same Captains making $100,000+ be left in a bad spot even if the starting pay were $50,000 at Envoy? Let's go with 50k to start and 10k raises every single year. It would take 5 years to get back to where you were and an additional 5 years to recoup your losses(not counting inflation).
Even this hypothetical contract would poach other 121 pilots and lead to at least one other regional going out of business.
But wouldn't those same Captains making $100,000+ be left in a bad spot even if the starting pay were $50,000 at Envoy? Let's go with 50k to start and 10k raises every single year. It would take 5 years to get back to where you were and an additional 5 years to recoup your losses(not counting inflation).
Even this hypothetical contract would poach other 121 pilots and lead to at least one other regional going out of business.
#84
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
), it would be interesting to watch. But wouldn't those same Captains making $100,000+ be left in a bad spot even if the starting pay were $50,000 at Envoy? Let's go with 50k to start and 10k raises every single year. It would take 5 years to get back to where you were and an additional 5 years to recoup your losses(not counting inflation).
Even this hypothetical contract would poach other 121 pilots and lead to at least one other regional going out of business.
Even this hypothetical contract would poach other 121 pilots and lead to at least one other regional going out of business.
I've said before that if Delta or UAL were to see a potentially successful threat to their regional feed and thus the core carrier, they'll react accordingly. So far that hasn't occurred. If Envoy's flow claims start really impacting that, those two carriers could easily blunt that in very short order. I've heard Delta will need 1000 pilots over the next year or so and United a lot too, whereas AA some furloughees left to call and only a few hundred to retire over that time and so could those carriers instantly stop movement away from their network carriers, if necessary ?
What would happen to Envoy by this time next year, if so ?
If you're at Envoy, don't be so sure this hand will be a winning one as you never know what cards you draw or what the dealer has in the future. I'm looking out for Envoy as much as any other regional in this respect as let's face it, the present Envoy MEC is NOT known for their shrewd bargaining or strategy. They are closer to the Keystone Cops and in fact, are under fire from snipers from past ethically bankrupt MEC's to regain control to make even more short-sighted decisions.
#85
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,611
Likes: 15
Ok, I've not read all of this thread, but all of you need to take a big giant chill pill and realize that whatever happens at the regionals in the next few years is just going to be a short term bandaid before the Big Major Staffing Crisis of the 2020s.
And as Exhibit A, I give you this:

And if big jet regionals as we know them today disappear before then, so much the better.
And as Exhibit A, I give you this:

And if big jet regionals as we know them today disappear before then, so much the better.
Last edited by TallFlyer; 09-15-2015 at 07:58 AM.
#87
Banned
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
#88
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
It goes beyond that micro to the macro. It divides the unionized pilots further advocating an "us and them" concept. From an entertainment standpoint (and this would be a depressing drama and not a comedy.........well, it would have some comedic elements
), it would be interesting to watch.
I disagree. It doesn't specifically target other carriers directly. That CONCEPT is the problem. It's no wonder many regional unions and pilots fall prey to the perils they're in nowadays as the thinking abilities of many simply is both too superficial and to self-oriented. If one raises pay, other do too. If one offers bonuses, other do too which has already occurred and BTW, with very marginal results. One union MEC taking direct aim at others pilots starts a different game. I don't think that will be a healthy game for ANYONE and if you cannot understand that, by all means go ahead and play it and we'll find out. Place your bet that you won't be one of the losers in that game. I'm just watching that game and again, it would sure get interesting.
I've said before that if Delta or UAL were to see a potentially successful threat to their regional feed and thus the core carrier, they'll react accordingly. So far that hasn't occurred. If Envoy's flow claims start really impacting that, those two carriers could easily blunt that in very short order. I've heard Delta will need 1000 pilots over the next year or so and United a lot too, whereas AA some furloughees left to call and only a few hundred to retire over that time and so could those carriers instantly stop movement away from their network carriers, if necessary ?
What would happen to Envoy by this time next year, if so ?
If you're at Envoy, don't be so sure this hand will be a winning one as you never know what cards you draw or what the dealer has in the future. I'm looking out for Envoy as much as any other regional in this respect as let's face it, the present Envoy MEC is NOT known for their shrewd bargaining or strategy. They are closer to the Keystone Cops and in fact, are under fire from snipers from past ethically bankrupt MEC's to regain control to make even more short-sighted decisions.
), it would be interesting to watch. I disagree. It doesn't specifically target other carriers directly. That CONCEPT is the problem. It's no wonder many regional unions and pilots fall prey to the perils they're in nowadays as the thinking abilities of many simply is both too superficial and to self-oriented. If one raises pay, other do too. If one offers bonuses, other do too which has already occurred and BTW, with very marginal results. One union MEC taking direct aim at others pilots starts a different game. I don't think that will be a healthy game for ANYONE and if you cannot understand that, by all means go ahead and play it and we'll find out. Place your bet that you won't be one of the losers in that game. I'm just watching that game and again, it would sure get interesting.
I've said before that if Delta or UAL were to see a potentially successful threat to their regional feed and thus the core carrier, they'll react accordingly. So far that hasn't occurred. If Envoy's flow claims start really impacting that, those two carriers could easily blunt that in very short order. I've heard Delta will need 1000 pilots over the next year or so and United a lot too, whereas AA some furloughees left to call and only a few hundred to retire over that time and so could those carriers instantly stop movement away from their network carriers, if necessary ?
What would happen to Envoy by this time next year, if so ?
If you're at Envoy, don't be so sure this hand will be a winning one as you never know what cards you draw or what the dealer has in the future. I'm looking out for Envoy as much as any other regional in this respect as let's face it, the present Envoy MEC is NOT known for their shrewd bargaining or strategy. They are closer to the Keystone Cops and in fact, are under fire from snipers from past ethically bankrupt MEC's to regain control to make even more short-sighted decisions.
#89
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,809
Likes: 0
From: Left
I stopped reading after the first couple sentences.....
That being said how in the world would pilots being able to transfer their pay to another airline be bad? This is the main reason we are in such a terrible situation with regionals in the first place.
I'm going to throw a "no freakin' way this ever happens" out there but if this is at all fact good for Eagle ALPA. This would truly be a game changer.
That being said how in the world would pilots being able to transfer their pay to another airline be bad? This is the main reason we are in such a terrible situation with regionals in the first place.
I'm going to throw a "no freakin' way this ever happens" out there but if this is at all fact good for Eagle ALPA. This would truly be a game changer.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



