Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
United Express pilot drama >

United Express pilot drama

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

United Express pilot drama

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-22-2015 | 09:30 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
From: 787 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by APC225
"Pilot was coming in 10 knots faster then he should have been [on arrival into Lubbock], co-pilot then radioed tower and told them, which started argument in cockpit as they landed."

I'd believe the scenario where the FO said go around for missing the gate criteria, the CA did not go around, and now you've got an issue.
Wait...I've flown with that captain at United
Reply
Old 09-22-2015 | 09:30 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,285
Likes: 103
Default

Originally Posted by APC225
"Pilot was coming in 10 knots faster then he should have been [on arrival into Lubbock], co-pilot then radioed tower and told them, which started argument in cockpit as they landed."

I'd believe the scenario where the FO said go around for missing the gate criteria, the CA did not go around, and now you've got an issue.
Assuming what you read was true............

Especially from a "blog" reader.
Reply
Old 09-22-2015 | 09:30 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
From: 787 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by oldmako
Of course, the exact opposite, or something completely different could be true also. Gotta love the web, once Entered, it must be accurate!
It HAS to be true...because some of the people commenting on the blog say they have intimate knowledge of the events...and some even KNOW the people involved
Reply
Old 09-22-2015 | 09:33 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
From: 787 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by John Carr
Assuming what you read was true............

Especially from a "blog" reader.
Tell us all what you know please. Can you give us at least ONE other hypothetical situation that makes sense? Or do you think speculation should be verboten here? You seem awful touchy about this...you ok??
Reply
Old 09-22-2015 | 09:34 AM
  #15  
APC225's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by John Carr
Assuming what you read was true............
Oh yea, lots of assumptions. But when the spokesman talks about a pilot altercation but short of fisticuffs without any other details, they invite that.
Reply
Old 09-22-2015 | 09:41 AM
  #16  
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,043
Likes: 0
From: A330
Default

Originally Posted by oldmako
On the 727, if you weren't coming in 10 knots fast, you had an issue.

The good old days.
On the DC-9 you added 10 for the wife, 10 for the ex wife, and 10 for the kids.

Maybe some suit behind a desk wrote in their manual that if you are +10 go around.
Reply
Old 09-22-2015 | 09:46 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,285
Likes: 103
Default

Originally Posted by APC225
Oh yea, lots of assumptions. But when the spokesman talks about a pilot altercation but short of fisticuffs without any other details, they invite that.
Assumptions, all too true.

A spokesman for ExpressJet, the regional carrier that operated the plane, said Monday reports indicated that police were called. Airport police did not immediately respond to messages seeking comment.
But sadly, you can get the police called to a plane for just about ANYTHING.

Who can ACTUALLY validate that it EVER got close to "fisticuffs"?

ALL you have is this;

There was no fight ... there was no physical altercation thankfully
AGAIN, pilots can be a funny breed.......

I'm NOT defending ANYTHING that happened. Simply pointing out how dumbed down society (NOT YOU) has become for taking things on the internwtz and face value.
Reply
Old 09-22-2015 | 09:47 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
From: 787 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by DCA A321 FO
On the DC-9 you added 10 for the wife, 10 for the ex wife, and 10 for the kids.

Maybe some suit behind a desk wrote in their manual that if you are +10 go around.
I read it as 10knots over the stabilized approach criteria. Of course I'm only speculating
Reply
Old 09-22-2015 | 10:30 AM
  #19  
APC225's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by John Carr
Assumptions, all too true.

But sadly, you can get the police called to a plane for just about ANYTHING.

Who can ACTUALLY validate that it EVER got close to "fisticuffs"?

ALL you have is this;

AGAIN, pilots can be a funny breed.......

I'm NOT defending ANYTHING that happened. Simply pointing out how dumbed down society (NOT YOU) has become for taking things on the internwtz and face value.
All true. But a couple of key points are beyond the usual assumptions. The official spokesman mentioned the police being called and made the reference to (not) physical altercation. Neither were necessary comments. Really bad spokesman at the very least, trying for damage control at best.
Reply
Old 09-22-2015 | 11:09 AM
  #20  
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,043
Likes: 0
From: A330
Default

Originally Posted by AxlF16
I read it as 10knots over the stabilized approach criteria. Of course I'm only speculating

So maybe target +20? I would have said, "yo bro, you mind slowing down," but that's just me. Obviously there is more to this story.


https://www.globalair.com/dtpp/globalair_00241ad.pdf
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gordon C
Air Wisconsin
10
06-11-2020 03:16 PM
DSRoss996
Regional
33
07-15-2014 11:47 AM
EWRflyr
United
44
04-26-2014 05:07 AM
T Dawg
United
9
09-19-2010 08:25 AM
FlyingW
Major
23
07-13-2009 03:17 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices