The MRJ90 and E175-E2 are done
#191
:-)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
If pilots go, whose job is safe? I've read articles about doctors and surgeons being replaced by robots. I would think by that logic computers should have already taken over law, math, engineering, sailing ships, etc. Instead we use the human element along with technology. Just my observation.
#192
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,833
Likes: 172
From: window seat
All of these problems are addressable, you can add human operators if systems are deferred. However, this is really not an issue, since if redundancy is lost, the aircraft would land at the nearest suitable airport. This is like saying we can't go below having 4 engines, because if one fails we can't make it to the destination. Is a two engine jet more costly, than a four engine jet, according to you it is. On top of that, a self driving car is ridiculously more complicated, than an autonomous aircraft. No matter how much you are in denial, this will happen, and soon.
#193
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,833
Likes: 172
From: window seat
It doesn't matter if I started yesterday or am C.E. Woodman posting from beyond. SkyWest will not get ever increasing sized airplanes to fly for other airlines. Either bet the farm on IndyAir or be happy within the confines of what unionized pilot groups allow your airline to fly.
And speaking of how one handles oneself, cue your insults, ad hominem attacks and zimmerman GIF's in 3...2...
#194
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,833
Likes: 172
From: window seat
You know, you are actually right. I did ask a question that I already knew the answer to. You see, you have one of those attitudes that some of the "less senior" guys carry that the senior guys hate. I mean come on, you have racked up close to 8,000 posts on a forum board, when you could have spent that time working harder on becoming a better pilot and better representative of your company. You see, it is because of guys like you, companies have to have social media guidelines and policies.
I would guarantee that your management would not be impressed with how you represent your company on here. I guarantee a lot of your fellow ALPA pilots would not be impressed with how you represent yourself on here.
General Lee did it over on flightinfo, and you do it here. Delta has some seriously wonderful pilots and employee's, quit making the widget look stupid.
Thread closed.
I would guarantee that your management would not be impressed with how you represent your company on here. I guarantee a lot of your fellow ALPA pilots would not be impressed with how you represent yourself on here.
General Lee did it over on flightinfo, and you do it here. Delta has some seriously wonderful pilots and employee's, quit making the widget look stupid.
Thread closed.
The industry is now several post BK contracts into this, and the line is being held quite strongly.
While you attempt to act better than others, you constantly resort to immature personal and ad hominem attacks and even thinly veiled threats. That's really classy of you, and it shows your character, as well as highlights the hypocrisy of the high and mighty tone you try to exude on one hand while resorting to that on the other.
Its clear that you either work for or have a strong vested interest in SKYW. That's fine, and I've said numerous times that they run a good operation and I give them credit for that. But IMO you're just not going to get larger flying for DL or UAL because the unions won't allow it, and they'd have to for you to be able to. That flying is 100% owned and controlled by the union pilot PWA's so relief would be needed for your airline to get the permission to fly bigger planes.
Of course, we can (and do) disagree on the likelihood of that permission being granted. You think its a 100% given, and I don't think it will happen. But even if it does, it will be the choice of the mainline pilot groups to decide to permit it for you. That it simply out of your hands.
I really don't see why that would upset you so much. I get that you're a SKYW fan, and that's fine. They've always been one of the better run regionals out there and I've said as much repeatedly. You're just not going to get larger planes to fly for DL or UAL in my opinion. Sorry if that offends you.
#196
I disagree completely. I know just as many millennials who are uncomfortable with self-driving cars as I do baby-boomers. It is going to take quite a bit of testing and certification to get the first fully pilotless aircraft. I estimate it to be in the next 40-50 years. Airlines aren't going to park brand new 787s in 15 years and completely repurchase an incredibly more expensive airplane just because it would save them a few dollars per ticket.
#197
Line Holder
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
Flag of convenience airlines will kill off any good jobs much quicker than pilotless airplanes. 10 years or less and you won't have many options. the good paying legacy jobs, the regionals that serve them and many other airlines will be history. Terrible time to be getting into aviation.
#198
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,153
Likes: 16
Flag of convenience airlines will kill off any good jobs much quicker than pilotless airplanes. 10 years or less and you won't have many options. the good paying legacy jobs, the regionals that serve them and many other airlines will be history. Terrible time to be getting into aviation.
#199
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0


