Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
MD87 down at Houston Executive, only 1 injury >

MD87 down at Houston Executive, only 1 injury

Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

MD87 down at Houston Executive, only 1 injury

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-09-2021, 06:39 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Position: Retired NJA & AA
Posts: 1,918
Default

Juan Browne has a new video on his "blancolirio" channel up on this accident. He has second hand info from someone who spoke to the accident Captain. The Captain claimed when they went to rotate the yoke moved but the nose didn't come up so they had to do an abort past V1. The TR buckets were stowed because he instinctively stowed them after coming to a stop. Juan goes into some detail with schematics showing what he think happened.

https://youtu.be/iyZT79WaaSs
AirBear is offline  
Old 11-10-2021, 06:58 AM
  #22  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,275
Default

Originally Posted by AirBear View Post
Juan Browne has a new video on his "blancolirio" channel up on this accident. He has second hand info from someone who spoke to the accident Captain. The Captain claimed when they went to rotate the yoke moved but the nose didn't come up so they had to do an abort past V1. The TR buckets were stowed because he instinctively stowed them after coming to a stop. Juan goes into some detail with schematics showing what he think happened.

https://youtu.be/iyZT79WaaSs
Basically suspects it was the same root cause, high winds jamming the free-floating elevator mechanism, as this one (also another one in Germany, which managed to stop on a long runway at Munich).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ameris...rs_Flight_9363
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 11-12-2021, 04:50 AM
  #23  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 19
Default Initial Investigation Details from NTSB

https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/...CA22MA009.aspx
JohnBoote is offline  
Old 11-12-2021, 06:31 AM
  #24  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,275
Default


Those images of the actuating links appear identical to the damaged links from the previous accident.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 11-12-2021, 07:23 AM
  #25  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Posts: 96
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Those images of the actuating links appear identical to the damaged links from the previous accident.
What's not identical is the description of the control column. This event has a locked column. the previous had a column that could be pulled all the way back. How could a jammed elevator due to the overcenter geared tab jam the mechanism to the control tab? Was the column free in the previous incident because only one elevator was jammed?
1wife2airlines is offline  
Old 11-12-2021, 04:12 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Position: Retired NJA & AA
Posts: 1,918
Default

Originally Posted by 1wife2airlines View Post
What's not identical is the description of the control column. This event has a locked column. the previous had a column that could be pulled all the way back. How could a jammed elevator due to the overcenter geared tab jam the mechanism to the control tab? Was the column free in the previous incident because only one elevator was jammed?
I wondered about that too when they said the control column didn't move. Juan Browne made an updated video with the NTSB info. He discusses whether this large of a jet should have been operated under FAR Part 125 vs. Part 91.

https://youtu.be/UTUPGUB8bKQ
AirBear is offline  
Old 11-12-2021, 05:21 PM
  #27  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Posts: 96
Default

Originally Posted by AirBear View Post
I wondered about that too when they said the control column didn't move. Juan Browne made an updated video with the NTSB info. He discusses whether this large of a jet should have been operated under FAR Part 125 vs. Part 91.

https://youtu.be/UTUPGUB8bKQ
Maybe we should ask the crew if they meant wet or cured concrete. Could the column move but airloads on the control tabs with TED made it like wet concrete or was it a solid jam as in cured concrete. BUT, was the crew aware of this when the did the preflite: "To mitigate the potential of takeoff initiation with a jammed elevator due to ground wind exposure, Boeing has developed the following additions to the DC-9 and MD-80 Flight Crew Operating Manuals:

* A Flight Controls Limitation stating, Prior to every flight elevator surfaces must be confirmed as not jammed in the Trailing Edge Down (TED) position.

* A warning in the DC-9 Flight Crew Walk Around and MD-80 Exterior Inspection Procedures stating, Prior to every flight, elevator surfaces must be confirmed as not jammed in the Trailing Edge Down (TED) position. IF both elevators are faired with or above, the stabilizer surface confirmation is complete.

* A Flight Operations Bulletin providing background information, the new limitation and warning wording, and the following means for a flight crew to confirm elevators are not jammed trailing edge down. The bulletin also states if a flight crew cannot confirm elevators are not jammed trailing edge down, inspection of the elevators per the Aircraft Maintenance Manual is required before flight:

* Observe whether both elevator trailing edges are faired with or above the trailing edge of the stabilizer. If one or both elevators are not faired with or above the trailing edge of the stabilizer, a flight crew may:

* Contact ground personnel prior to pressurizing the hydraulic system, as procedurally required while accomplishing the BEFORE START checklist, and perform a coordinated check of elevator freedom of movement between the flight crew and ground personnel. Move either control column full forward until the ELEVATOR PWR ON light illuminates (elevators TED) and then check for any upward movement of the elevators as the control column is moved fully aft.

OR

* Pull a control column to the full aft stop prior to leaving the cockpit to conduct the preflight external inspection. The elevators may remain displaced and allow the pilot to confirm the elevators are aligned with, or above, the trailing edge of the stabilizer during the exterior inspection.

OR

* Perform an approved coordinated procedure between the captain and first officer, one pulling the column while the other observes movement of any elevator that is not faired or above the trailing edge of the stabilizer.

The DC-9 information was published in the Boeing DC-9 Flight Crew Operating Manual in Temporary Revisions 2-481 and 2-482 and also Flight Operations Bulletin 2-005 on 30 July 2020."
1wife2airlines is offline  
Old 11-15-2021, 01:54 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
captjns's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,912
Default

Preliminary report from the NTSB.



https://www.avweb.com/aviation-news/...ber+15%2C+2021
captjns is offline  
Old 11-15-2021, 09:18 AM
  #29  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,275
Default

Originally Posted by 1wife2airlines View Post
Maybe we should ask the crew if they meant wet or cured concrete. Could the column move but airloads on the control tabs with TED made it like wet concrete or was it a solid jam as in cured concrete.
I could see airloads making it harder than normal to move the tabs, but that should not be enough to lock the column.

Also possible that the altered geometry from the TED jam could have also jammed the tab linkages? But presumably they exercise the tabs during flight control checks?

Also remotely possible that the adrenaline caused them to misremember whether the column actually moved.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 11-16-2021, 02:27 AM
  #30  
In a land of unicorns
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Whale FO
Posts: 6,469
Default

Originally Posted by captjns View Post
This smells like a potentially grounding AD might be in the works.
dera is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kayco
United
190
08-07-2022 12:19 PM
donny
American
2048
09-06-2016 03:33 PM
APC225
United
42
06-12-2012 08:01 AM
SoCalGuy
Major
23
07-17-2009 04:06 PM
flight0813
Regional
36
04-01-2009 07:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices