PSA Crash with Helicopter at DCA…
#121
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 949
Likes: 58
I am putting myself in their shoes. I wonder if they were scanning really trying to acquire the aircraft and lost concentration on altitude. I was a hawk driver in a previous life and it takes just a smidge of back pressure on the cyclic to get a pretty good climb going. Further, maintaining 200 feet would require whoever is on the controls to be looking inside on the instrument panel quite a bit. Focusing outside for an extended amount of time would definitely cause the altitude to drift, and 100-200 feet is nothing.
You know, this has made me think at all of the times I made a mistake or got away with something while flying. Anyone who has flown for more than a day knows that all of us have had our share or screw ups, some small and some big. The more I look back the more I realize that at times it was dumb luck that kept me alive. So tragic for all involved.
You know, this has made me think at all of the times I made a mistake or got away with something while flying. Anyone who has flown for more than a day knows that all of us have had our share or screw ups, some small and some big. The more I look back the more I realize that at times it was dumb luck that kept me alive. So tragic for all involved.
--------Hindsight is 20/20, but the separation is mind boggling. The old 200' talking to, 300' phone number. But here we're comfortable with 100'-200' separating catastrophe... WTF. Anyone on here who's flown low level NVGs in high light/traffic areas can all probably relate to this incident - scanning for traffic, thinking you're looking at the traffic called not one of the numerous others in the vicinity, the visual illusions, through the NODs, under the NODs, inside, outside... I fart wrong , apply a little aft cycling and begin an unintentional climb...
To the lay person it's like WTF - how can anyone just fly right into a jet? (cue all the nut job conspiracies). To those that have done it, I think we see the fragility of what was going on in that airspace.------
#122
This is one of the better observations. I strongly suspect one of the 'recommendations' from the NTSB will be exactly this. No circles to 33 if a helo is anywhere near the helo routes.
#124
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2024
Posts: 51
Likes: 2
Spot on. I posted below on the other thread. To those of us that have done it, it's pretty clear how it could have happened. It's hard to explain how I felt when I first saw the video - like I had been there before. The bright lights, the halos, inside, outside, the chatter on the ICS and radio, trying to scan for traffic while maintaining exact lateral/vertical. Reading what you wrote, I instantly can tell you've been there as well. It's tragic and horrific. I was never assigned there and only flew in there a handful if times while at my regional, so had no knowledge this minimal separation was a thing. In hindsight it's amazing to me that there weren't better backstops to prevent something like this from happening.
--------Hindsight is 20/20, but the separation is mind boggling. The old 200' talking to, 300' phone number. But here we're comfortable with 100'-200' separating catastrophe... WTF. Anyone on here who's flown low level NVGs in high light/traffic areas can all probably relate to this incident - scanning for traffic, thinking you're looking at the traffic called not one of the numerous others in the vicinity, the visual illusions, through the NODs, under the NODs, inside, outside... I fart wrong , apply a little aft cycling and begin an unintentional climb...
To the lay person it's like WTF - how can anyone just fly right into a jet? (cue all the nut job conspiracies). To those that have done it, I think we see the fragility of what was going on in that airspace.------
--------Hindsight is 20/20, but the separation is mind boggling. The old 200' talking to, 300' phone number. But here we're comfortable with 100'-200' separating catastrophe... WTF. Anyone on here who's flown low level NVGs in high light/traffic areas can all probably relate to this incident - scanning for traffic, thinking you're looking at the traffic called not one of the numerous others in the vicinity, the visual illusions, through the NODs, under the NODs, inside, outside... I fart wrong , apply a little aft cycling and begin an unintentional climb...
To the lay person it's like WTF - how can anyone just fly right into a jet? (cue all the nut job conspiracies). To those that have done it, I think we see the fragility of what was going on in that airspace.------
#126
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,149
Likes: 802
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
The family has requested that the DoD not release the name of third pilot yet.
But that's temporary, while the mil can sometimes redact parts or entire investigations of internal incidents that will 100% not apply with civil aircraft involvement, to say nothing of something this high profile.
It will all come out, in the meantime give the deceased crew professional courtesy.
But that's temporary, while the mil can sometimes redact parts or entire investigations of internal incidents that will 100% not apply with civil aircraft involvement, to say nothing of something this high profile.
It will all come out, in the meantime give the deceased crew professional courtesy.
#127
Banned
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 4,208
Likes: 7
The family has requested that the DoD not release the name of third pilot yet.
But that's temporary, while the mil can sometimes redact parts or entire investigations of internal incidents that will 100% not apply with civil aircraft involvement, to say nothing of something this high profile.
It will all come out, in the meantime give the deceased crew professional courtesy.
But that's temporary, while the mil can sometimes redact parts or entire investigations of internal incidents that will 100% not apply with civil aircraft involvement, to say nothing of something this high profile.
It will all come out, in the meantime give the deceased crew professional courtesy.
#128
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,149
Likes: 802
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Don't know why they did but I can sure speculate under the circumstances: Didn't want 20 media vans parked on their front yard after they lost their child?
DoD is under no obligation ever to publicly identify casualties, and there are a very few cases where they do not for operational reasons (this is not that). In this case it will all be disclosed and scrutinized soon enough. In the meantime we give the dead some professional deference. Even if elected officials get way out over their skis on that.
#129
Sonic you're way out over your skis here. I've been in a military accident, the 11 o'clock was "one dead, one survives accident". They contacted my parents, so Mom being they had my picture. No one thought to tell anybody else, so lots of scared phone calls at midnight.
There are DOD Instructions on how to notify next of kin, public release and family's right to withhold public release. We have a president making uninformed posts, media idiots posting nonsense, I wouldn't want my kid's names released.
EDIT, I posted then read Rickair's post.
#130
The family doesn't normally request that (yes I've been at commands which had to deal with this).
Don't know why they did but I can sure speculate under the circumstances: Didn't want 20 media vans parked on their front yard after they lost their child?
DoD is under no obligation ever to publicly identify casualties, and there are a very few cases where they do not for operational reasons (this is not that). In this case it will all be disclosed and scrutinized soon enough. In the meantime we give the dead some professional deference. Even if elected officials get way out over their skis on that.
Don't know why they did but I can sure speculate under the circumstances: Didn't want 20 media vans parked on their front yard after they lost their child?
DoD is under no obligation ever to publicly identify casualties, and there are a very few cases where they do not for operational reasons (this is not that). In this case it will all be disclosed and scrutinized soon enough. In the meantime we give the dead some professional deference. Even if elected officials get way out over their skis on that.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



