Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
PSA Crash with Helicopter at DCA… >

PSA Crash with Helicopter at DCA?


Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

PSA Crash with Helicopter at DCA…

Old 02-01-2025 | 04:38 AM
  #121  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 949
Likes: 58
Default

Originally Posted by PilotdadCJDCMD
I am putting myself in their shoes. I wonder if they were scanning really trying to acquire the aircraft and lost concentration on altitude. I was a hawk driver in a previous life and it takes just a smidge of back pressure on the cyclic to get a pretty good climb going. Further, maintaining 200 feet would require whoever is on the controls to be looking inside on the instrument panel quite a bit. Focusing outside for an extended amount of time would definitely cause the altitude to drift, and 100-200 feet is nothing.

You know, this has made me think at all of the times I made a mistake or got away with something while flying. Anyone who has flown for more than a day knows that all of us have had our share or screw ups, some small and some big. The more I look back the more I realize that at times it was dumb luck that kept me alive. So tragic for all involved.
Spot on. I posted below on the other thread. To those of us that have done it, it's pretty clear how it could have happened. It's hard to explain how I felt when I first saw the video - like I had been there before. The bright lights, the halos, inside, outside, the chatter on the ICS and radio, trying to scan for traffic while maintaining exact lateral/vertical. Reading what you wrote, I instantly can tell you've been there as well. It's tragic and horrific. I was never assigned there and only flew in there a handful if times while at my regional, so had no knowledge this minimal separation was a thing. In hindsight it's amazing to me that there weren't better backstops to prevent something like this from happening.

--------Hindsight is 20/20, but the separation is mind boggling. The old 200' talking to, 300' phone number. But here we're comfortable with 100'-200' separating catastrophe... WTF. Anyone on here who's flown low level NVGs in high light/traffic areas can all probably relate to this incident - scanning for traffic, thinking you're looking at the traffic called not one of the numerous others in the vicinity, the visual illusions, through the NODs, under the NODs, inside, outside... I fart wrong , apply a little aft cycling and begin an unintentional climb...

To the lay person it's like WTF - how can anyone just fly right into a jet? (cue all the nut job conspiracies). To those that have done it, I think we see the fragility of what was going on in that airspace.------
Reply
Old 02-01-2025 | 06:06 AM
  #122  
FangsF15's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,347
Likes: 1,352
Default

Originally Posted by flydrive
It looks to me that the Helicopter route in question was designed with the assumption that while being utilized, only runway 1/19 would be in use at DCA. I believe that a transition from 1 to 33 concurrent with a transiting helicopter should not ever have been offered.
This is one of the better observations. I strongly suspect one of the 'recommendations' from the NTSB will be exactly this. No circles to 33 if a helo is anywhere near the helo routes.
Reply
Old 02-01-2025 | 06:16 AM
  #123  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 4,208
Likes: 7
Question

Have they released the names of all 3 helicopter pilots?
Reply
Old 02-01-2025 | 07:27 AM
  #124  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2024
Posts: 51
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by 60av8tor
Spot on. I posted below on the other thread. To those of us that have done it, it's pretty clear how it could have happened. It's hard to explain how I felt when I first saw the video - like I had been there before. The bright lights, the halos, inside, outside, the chatter on the ICS and radio, trying to scan for traffic while maintaining exact lateral/vertical. Reading what you wrote, I instantly can tell you've been there as well. It's tragic and horrific. I was never assigned there and only flew in there a handful if times while at my regional, so had no knowledge this minimal separation was a thing. In hindsight it's amazing to me that there weren't better backstops to prevent something like this from happening.

--------Hindsight is 20/20, but the separation is mind boggling. The old 200' talking to, 300' phone number. But here we're comfortable with 100'-200' separating catastrophe... WTF. Anyone on here who's flown low level NVGs in high light/traffic areas can all probably relate to this incident - scanning for traffic, thinking you're looking at the traffic called not one of the numerous others in the vicinity, the visual illusions, through the NODs, under the NODs, inside, outside... I fart wrong , apply a little aft cycling and begin an unintentional climb...

To the lay person it's like WTF - how can anyone just fly right into a jet? (cue all the nut job conspiracies). To those that have done it, I think we see the fragility of what was going on in that airspace.------
Yea you definitely speak my language. To the non helicopter guys, flying low level at night is very challenging. I read that this is a 1,500 hour crew, if this is true it's pretty junior. A one thousand hour instructor pilot is pretty green. So there is an annual proficiency flight going on, with a junior co-pilot, all of the challenges that night flying brings, with literally no room for error. I'm astonished it has taken this long for this to happen. In my opinion they were looking at the wrong aircraft, or they indeed did see the correct aircraft and then lost it in the lights. It's happened to me many many times, you see it then you don't. Awful.
Reply
Old 02-01-2025 | 08:45 AM
  #125  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,149
Likes: 802
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by GogglesPisano
This.

I haven't called "Traffic in sight" in 15 years. There's no upside. Let the controllers control.
I think you're right.
Reply
Old 02-01-2025 | 08:51 AM
  #126  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,149
Likes: 802
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
Have they released the names of all 3 helicopter pilots?
The family has requested that the DoD not release the name of third pilot yet.

But that's temporary, while the mil can sometimes redact parts or entire investigations of internal incidents that will 100% not apply with civil aircraft involvement, to say nothing of something this high profile.

It will all come out, in the meantime give the deceased crew professional courtesy.
Reply
Old 02-01-2025 | 09:21 AM
  #127  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 4,208
Likes: 7
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
The family has requested that the DoD not release the name of third pilot yet.

But that's temporary, while the mil can sometimes redact parts or entire investigations of internal incidents that will 100% not apply with civil aircraft involvement, to say nothing of something this high profile.

It will all come out, in the meantime give the deceased crew professional courtesy.
As was mentioned in another thread, it doesn't seem to be SOP that the government witholds names for more than 24 hours after the family is notified. If that's true, why is it the case now? It's a legitimate question because the concealment seems odd.
Reply
Old 02-01-2025 | 10:41 AM
  #128  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,149
Likes: 802
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
As was mentioned in another thread, it doesn't seem to be SOP that the government witholds names for more than 24 hours after the family is notified. If that's true, why is it the case now? It's a legitimate question because the concealment seems odd.
The family doesn't normally request that (yes I've been at commands which had to deal with this).

Don't know why they did but I can sure speculate under the circumstances: Didn't want 20 media vans parked on their front yard after they lost their child?

DoD is under no obligation ever to publicly identify casualties, and there are a very few cases where they do not for operational reasons (this is not that). In this case it will all be disclosed and scrutinized soon enough. In the meantime we give the dead some professional deference. Even if elected officials get way out over their skis on that.
Reply
Old 02-01-2025 | 11:14 AM
  #129  
galaxy flyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 5,244
Likes: 2
From: Baja Vermont
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
As was mentioned in another thread, it doesn't seem to be SOP that the government witholds names for more than 24 hours after the family is notified. If that's true, why is it the case now? It's a legitimate question because the concealment seems odd.
I'm sorry and Rickair can give me a warning, but...

Sonic you're way out over your skis here. I've been in a military accident, the 11 o'clock was "one dead, one survives accident". They contacted my parents, so Mom being they had my picture. No one thought to tell anybody else, so lots of scared phone calls at midnight.

There are DOD Instructions on how to notify next of kin, public release and family's right to withhold public release. We have a president making uninformed posts, media idiots posting nonsense, I wouldn't want my kid's names released.

EDIT, I posted then read Rickair's post.
Reply
Old 02-01-2025 | 12:38 PM
  #130  
bababouey's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 898
Likes: 47
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
The family doesn't normally request that (yes I've been at commands which had to deal with this).

Don't know why they did but I can sure speculate under the circumstances: Didn't want 20 media vans parked on their front yard after they lost their child?

DoD is under no obligation ever to publicly identify casualties, and there are a very few cases where they do not for operational reasons (this is not that). In this case it will all be disclosed and scrutinized soon enough. In the meantime we give the dead some professional deference. Even if elected officials get way out over their skis on that.
Sounds reasonable. If blackhawks have the pm make atc radio calls, then we can assume she was pf? I know it will all come out, but that’s the first thing that came to mind and where all the heat will be placed.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PurdueFlyer
PSA Airlines
174
09-08-2021 08:26 AM
takingmessages
Safety
0
06-21-2020 08:11 AM
F4E Mx
Safety
8
07-06-2019 07:38 AM
ToiletDuck
Safety
5
08-08-2012 09:04 PM
alarkyokie
Hangar Talk
5
09-25-2008 03:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices