I correctly said we don't know where the aicraft is. This is a fact.

Because pieces of the aircraft may have been located in the Indian ocean, does NOT mean the aircraft is in the Indian ocean. It means that pieces of the aircraft ended up there; a conclusion cannot be drawn. No assuptions.

The aircraft may be there. It may not.

Circumstantial details surely make fun datapoints for the conspiracy brighsparks, though. Assumption, as they say, is the mother of all ****ups, and some truly love their mothers, as we continue to see.

I would like to think so.

You really need to learn how to quote.

It's getting worse and it's pathetic.

So you're implying someone - an entity - ripped up parts of the flaperon and other aircraft pieces confirmed to be from MH370, and dumped them in the middle of the IO, and then found washed up ashore eastern African countries?

Sorry - that airplane is at the bottom of the IO. The washed up parts are the proof, along with the Inmarsat data of the southern arc.

There is derived satcom telemetry showing it over the Indian Ocean. Unless it went there, dropped decoy pieces then was transported elsewhere ... it's in the big gigantic Indian Oceean somewhere

yeah, and he said I was a conspiracy theorist.

I watched that video hoping to see where the creator got the evidence for what was happening in the cabin. How could he know that the FO was still alive using a portable O2 bottle? Was that all just speculation? If it was it was just a waste of time.

The O2 bottle part was speculation but perfectly reasonable since apparently the FO's cell phone got a brief hit off a tower after the flight disappeared. That tends to imply that he was trying to use his phone, which would imply that he was locked out of the front. Also posssible he just left his phone on, but in the flight levels it would really have to be held up to a window to get any signal. If I accidently leave mine on, it doesn't get any signal tucked away by the side of my seat behind the fuselage.

The value-add of this video was that it brought together a lot of digital forensics, some of which i wasn't aware of before.

I'm assuming the guy didn't fabricate the data he's basing his theory on, but I didn't bother to track it down to verify.

Not definitive, but reasonable. It's not like we should be waiting for the official report, that won't conclusive either unless they find the boxes and recover the data.