Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
Will the AirAsia 8501 tapes be released? >

Will the AirAsia 8501 tapes be released?

Search

Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Will the AirAsia 8501 tapes be released?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-27-2015 | 06:22 PM
  #1  
USMCFLYR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13,843
Likes: 1
From: FAA 'Flight Check'
Default Will the AirAsia 8501 tapes be released?

Continued discussion..............
Reply
Old 01-27-2015 | 08:24 PM
  #2  
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,150
Likes: 51
From: Volleyball Player
Default

Yes, when North Korea hacks them.

(seriously, our NTSB has some pretty amazing protections at CVR and FDR data, I'm guessing that's not really going to happen here )

I was reading the story this morning and thinking to myself: yeah right, I bet they'll be leaked/revealed/hacked.
Reply
Old 01-28-2015 | 04:13 AM
  #3  
Captain Bligh's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
Default

I've been receiving some PMs that discretely suggest there may be some parallels (previous accidents) that some parties may have a vested interest in not discussing publicly. I'm starting to doubt that the CVR will have much weight in determining the real cause here anyhow. FDR data likely far more important. It's release would just baffle the average newspaper subscriber. The complexity and sample rates of the data would even baffle many pilots. It's interpretation however subject to speculation of the investigators.

My speculation? The tail came off this airframe in flight.
Reply
Old 01-28-2015 | 08:37 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,373
Likes: 368
Default

Originally Posted by Captain Bligh
I've been receiving some PMs that discretely suggest there may be some parallels (previous accidents) that some parties may have a vested interest in not discussing publicly. I'm starting to doubt that the CVR will have much weight in determining the real cause here anyhow. FDR data likely far more important. It's release would just baffle the average newspaper subscriber. The complexity and sample rates of the data would even baffle many pilots. It's interpretation however subject to speculation of the investigators.

My speculation? The tail came off this airframe in flight.
If indeed both FACs failed as has been alluded to in a press release, then without due care on the rudder yes it could have been ripped off.
Reply
Old 01-28-2015 | 09:48 AM
  #5  
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
Moderate Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,681
Likes: 0
From: Curator at Static Display
Default

That doesn't explain the high rate of climb prior to the rapid descent.

The tail did come off---it was found quite a distance from the majority of the fuselage.

But inflight breakups where the tail comes off (at high speed) usually result in a negative-g pitchover, departure of engines, and the fuselage failing near the wings.

I think it came off at lower speed.....possible a spin/departure that the protections in the Bus couldn't have prevented (super updraft).
Reply
Old 01-28-2015 | 09:51 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
If indeed both FACs failed as has been alluded to in a press release, then without due care on the rudder yes it could have been ripped off.
Are we talking tail-end completely blown off, or more of a JAL123 type of situation? That flight flew for quite some time giving ample time to radio in a distress call.
Reply
Old 01-28-2015 | 10:00 AM
  #7  
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
Moderate Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,681
Likes: 0
From: Curator at Static Display
Default

JAL 123 Had a stub of tail remaining. It flew for almost an hour.

AA 587 sheared the entire fin off; breaking the steel attach flanges (and not the composite surface, as detractors speculated). It went into a spin almost immediately; centrifugal force tore the engines off within seconds.

8501's tail (during recovery operations) clearly showed it was attached to a significant portion of rear fuselage.
Reply
Old 01-28-2015 | 11:22 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,373
Likes: 368
Default

Originally Posted by UAL T38 Phlyer
That doesn't explain the high rate of climb prior to the rapid descent.

The tail did come off---it was found quite a distance from the majority of the fuselage.

But inflight breakups where the tail comes off (at high speed) usually result in a negative-g pitchover, departure of engines, and the fuselage failing near the wings.

I think it came off at lower speed.....possible a spin/departure that the protections in the Bus couldn't have prevented (super updraft).
Could have floated away after impact with water break up depending on the water drift.

Don't know what happened but it does sound like they are looking at a failure of both FACs.
Reply
Old 01-28-2015 | 01:02 PM
  #9  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by Captain Bligh

My speculation? The tail came off this airframe in flight.
I'm guessing you haven't seen the pictures of the tail section yet. It was still very firmly attached to a portion of the aft fuselage.

If it did come off, it took part of the fuselage with it (not a shearing event like you seem to be speculating).
Reply
Old 01-28-2015 | 02:36 PM
  #10  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: Salmon-37 FO
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
If indeed both FACs failed as has been alluded to in a press release, then without due care on the rudder yes it could have been ripped off.
Via MSN News site, originally reported by Reuters:

[URL="http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/exclusive-airasia-probe-vets-possible-computer-glitch-crew-response/ar-AA8D034"]

Question for Airbus 320 series drivers: Could TS updraft/downdraft encounter result in regressed and/or alternate law flight mode(s) and make FAC failure more likely? I assume FAC failure means loss of yaw damper also.

Thanks.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ShyGuy
Safety
310
01-28-2015 02:36 PM
Cheddar
United
98
05-30-2013 04:51 AM
jtf560
Foreign
0
09-20-2011 01:48 PM
detpilot
Hangar Talk
32
01-29-2011 07:29 PM
Jetspeed
Major
64
02-08-2009 04:40 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices