Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
Second door-maybe now it's not too expensive >

Second door-maybe now it's not too expensive

Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Second door-maybe now it's not too expensive

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-08-2017, 01:08 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Adlerdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 767 Captain
Posts: 3,988
Default

Originally Posted by glasspilot View Post
RI830, I don't know why you're going off on a tangent in this thread. It is about protecting against a mentally ill pilot from being alone in the cockpit. Also, I believe, it's about one person up front and he/she becomes very ill/dies. The US has been doing the 2 person CP since 9/11. Not sure why the Europeans feel it's such a big deal to implement.
Neither. Those two reasons might be by-products tagged on in light of recent events but the two person wasn't conceived to account for crazy or sick pilots. The main reason is the requirement to visually clear the area with the view port before opening the door. One pilot in the seat can't do that alone, hence the second person. Maybe euros with a camera screening the door have decided to change the requirement. I'm not aware of any US carriers using door cameras yet, but it might be coming.

And yes, RI830 is off on a huge tangent.
Adlerdriver is offline  
Old 05-08-2017, 03:38 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RI830's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: Left seat on a kite
Posts: 1,884
Default

Sarcasm detectors are malfunctioning around here today.
Lighten up Francis
RI830 is offline  
Old 05-11-2017, 12:13 AM
  #43  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Position: A320 Left
Posts: 97
Default

Originally Posted by glasspilot View Post
RI830, I don't know why you're going off on a tangent in this thread. It is about protecting against a mentally ill pilot from being alone in the cockpit. Also, I believe, it's about one person up front and he/she becomes very ill/dies. The US has been doing the 2 person CP since 9/11. Not sure why the Europeans feel it's such a big deal to implement.
You really believe a person with just 4 weeks of training as flight attendant, the cheapest and fastest background check possible and an iranian passport (or turkish, polish, ukrainian etc) is fit to assess the mental state of a pilot? That is the reality in europe.

And unlike in the US the reinforced doors were introduced with the requirement (at least in germany, ireland as the "africa of europe" handles things differently) that pilots from their seat can visually inspect the entrance areas and those that want to enter the flight deck, as well as being able to open the door and refuse entry. All installations i know have at least three cameras for the entry area. Even an incapacitation is not a big issue as an emergency code allows reentry from the oudside in that case.
Denti is offline  
Old 05-11-2017, 04:13 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: MD-80 CA, Retired
Posts: 106
Default

Originally Posted by Denti View Post
You really believe a person with just 4 weeks of training as flight attendant, the cheapest and fastest background check possible and an iranian passport (or turkish, polish, ukrainian etc) is fit to assess the mental state of a pilot?
Denti, the second person is not there to be a medical genius. Just to "watch". I think ShyGuy said it best in post #20:

"Had there been a FA right there with him, his insecurities would probably have prevented him from carrying out the crash. (Just conjecture) but based on the facts presented about him so far, it's very plausible he wouldn't have done this with a FA present."
glasspilot is offline  
Old 06-12-2017, 06:41 PM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Originally Posted by glasspilot View Post
Denti, the second person is not there to be a medical genius. Just to "watch". I think ShyGuy said it best in post #20:

"Had there been a FA right there with him, his insecurities would probably have prevented him from carrying out the crash. (Just conjecture) but based on the facts presented about him so far, it's very plausible he wouldn't have done this with a FA present."
He is going to kill himself and everyone onboard and a flight attendant in the cockpit would have prevented it because he was insecure?
sailingfun is offline  
Old 06-12-2017, 08:23 PM
  #46  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,286
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
He is going to kill himself and everyone onboard and a flight attendant in the cockpit would have prevented it because he was insecure?
I think it probably would have in this case. The guy was not a committed al queda terrorist. He wanted to spend his last minutes quietly contemplating his navel, not engaged in a life and death struggle with a FA who would be trying to let the CA back in.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 06-13-2017, 03:36 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: MD-80 CA, Retired
Posts: 106
Default

I agree with rickair. If the F/A senses anything wrong he/she just opens the door and calls for help.
glasspilot is offline  
Old 06-14-2017, 01:54 AM
  #48  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Position: A320 Left
Posts: 97
Default

Yeah, that works really well. Not. We had already an incident in germany where an FA thought the remaining pilot did something wrong (he followed an ATC descend clearance) and forcibly tried to remove him from the controls, including blows to the head. It was hushed up, but played a role in discontinuing this useless and frankly dangerous procedure under the circumstances in europe.

FAs are not psychologists, pilots, police or anything else, they are just persons who, after a very rudimentary 4 weeks training course, are allowed to work on planes, safely on the other side of the flightdeck door. Nowadays in large percentages with an eastern european or middle east/islamic background.
Denti is offline  
Old 06-14-2017, 07:49 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: MD-80 CA, Retired
Posts: 106
Default

Well, Denti, I never heard that one. Like you say it was covered up. The training of the F/A's for this duty should have simple, straight actions if he/she thinks the sole remaining pilot is doing something "strange". Opening the door to let in the other pilot is the answer, not hitting the guy! I'll bet the F/A in your scenario felt pretty stupid when the situation was explained to her.

By going back to the "one person in the cockpit is ok" thing, how does this address the suicidal pilot scenario? Is the attitude now, "This is such a rare thing, we are just going to assume it won't happen again?"
glasspilot is offline  
Old 06-15-2017, 02:39 AM
  #50  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Position: A320 Left
Posts: 97
Default

Originally Posted by glasspilot View Post
Well, Denti, I never heard that one. Like you say it was covered up. The training of the F/A's for this duty should have simple, straight actions if he/she thinks the sole remaining pilot is doing something "strange". Opening the door to let in the other pilot is the answer, not hitting the guy! I'll bet the F/A in your scenario felt pretty stupid when the situation was explained to her.

By going back to the "one person in the cockpit is ok" thing, how does this address the suicidal pilot scenario? Is the attitude now, "This is such a rare thing, we are just going to assume it won't happen again?"
Well, what do you define as "strange"? What does the 19 year old romanian girl or boy who is the lucky FA of the day, define as strange? Simply impossible to define, and therefore not part of the mandated training. The training is to open the door on request, which is not necessary as the remaining pilot can do that on his own, and usually does faster than the FA in the flightdeck.

The suicidal pilot thing cannot be adressed adequately, never will be. It happened before the reinforced door was invented, with a full flight deck, and it will happen again. However, weighing that risk against someone with hostile intent entering the flightdeck, the latter one won out. Not to mention, quite a few airlines in europe never introduced that two persons on the flightdeck thing in the first place.
Denti is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
7thgear
Flight Schools and Training
26
04-12-2015 11:09 AM
EWR73FO
United
15
07-25-2012 06:13 PM
Jabberwock
Flight Schools and Training
9
12-07-2010 11:57 PM
⌐ AV8OR WANNABE
Cargo
0
06-19-2008 12:00 AM
Gunter
Cargo
16
11-15-2007 06:23 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices