Quote:
Originally Posted by iaflyer
That's why we need to get the raises via work rules. Wall Street types and newspapers look for the quick quote, "15% over 3 years". But get the money in the work rules or retirement - they won't know what 4:30 vacation pay means or 5:15 min day. Or additional 5% in 401(k) contribution.
I think the company will talk about as a package and not hourly rates when they explain to the media and investors and creditors that we're asking for something that would increase pilot costs 75%.
But if management wants to play cool and just talk hourly rates then I want them to explain how we we're willing to take a 10% cut right off the top in our hourly wages. But get paid by the duty hour with min pay probably around the 10 hour mark.
----
On a different subject. There seems to be a lot of fingers pointed around on who would give up what during the contract negotiations. In particular, old guys don't want to rock the boat this close to retirement and young civilian guys have never made this much money and they'll never rock the boat.
I think when it comes to the young civilian guys you'd be surprised how many of them, despite making more than their previous job, have no problem walking off the job.
We don't talk about striking over C2012 much but don't be surprised if the RJ types have no problem demanding SWA scope and pay + or FEDEX scope and pay + or we vote every TA down and
we strike. They're not as wimpy as some seem to think. After all, while very unpopular, it was Comair that went on strike.
You have to wait and see, just like we have to wait and see what the company offers and what ALPA offers. Frankly, none of us know right now what this pilot group will do or even what the economy we are negotiating in will be.