Quote:
Originally Posted by mercys ghost
Smart business is in the eye of the beholder however. Why do you just advocate for pilot unions, and not for union representation for other work groups? Granted I understand you are a pilot, and making a case for pilots, but why stop there? And in all honesty, why are you so focused on SkyWest pilots? Do you really want what is best for them? Are you mad that you feel SkyWest pilots have piggy-backed off and had benefits granted to them without a union and feel they need to pay their dues?
When one side has people looking out for their best interest, the other side should have the same, if only to make it more of an even playing field. Yes, that’s absolutely smart business.
Like you said, I’m a pilot. Skywest pilots are the largest non-union group. Them being part of ALPA would strengthen the pilot community. So you can say that it is selfish if you want. I feel there is a lot of talent in their large pilot group that would be useful in advancing safety and security. This has been my biggest reason for pilots to join ALPA, the contract and representation secondary. I’ve been preaching this for years. So like I said, call it selfishness on my part. But I truly believe Skywest pilots would get more out of ALPA if they joined than I would individually.
As for other work groups, I have no problem if they unionize, more power to them. If they are taking about organizing, I’ll be right there supporting them as well. But this forum is a pilot forum.
So what’s your angle? Are you a pilot? A Skywest pilot? A Skywest employee? What is your agenda? What motivates you so much so as to take the position that Skywest pilots don’t deserve their own representation at all levels of their profession? What do you get out of them remaining non-union?