From ALPA National to DL Management?

Subscribe
Search this Thread
First
Page
3 of 11
Last
Go to
Page
1  2  3  4  5  6  7 
Page 3 of 11
Go to
  #21  
ShyGuy , 12-10-2018 03:21 PM
Gets Weekends Off
ShyGuy
Gets Weekends Off
close
  • Joined APC
    Dec 2005
  • Posts:
    8,898
Quote:
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Looks like RD is going straight from Exec Administrator at National into a management position at DL.

Discuss.
That should be illegal. There should be a 5-yr no conflict clause when you leave ALPA as an Exec Administrator.
Reply
  #22  
gzsg , 12-10-2018 03:22 PM
Gets Weekends Off
gzsg
Gets Weekends Off
close
  • Joined APC
    Oct 2009
  • Posts:
    3,108
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Don't think this is good. It would be much better if he were on our side of the table. He probably would be on our side of the table had we been able to keep our stuff together at ALPA National's BOD meeting or if we had not gotten really wild with some of our choices for Reps. There is no politically viable way for him to work for us.

Reality check, we have had 5 scope Chairmen in less than two years (assuming Brent gets replaced). We just had a negotiator resign. We lack the political stability and discipline to develop our team properly.
Maybe if we beg we can get Tom Dilbeck back.
Reply
  #23  
notEnuf's Avatar
notEnuf , 12-10-2018 03:36 PM
Gets Weekends Off
notEnuf
Gets Weekends Off
close
  • Joined APC
    Mar 2015
  • Position
    stake holder ir.delta.com
  • Posts:
    10,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by badflaps
In the wayback they did the same thing with Greenberg, nuthin' new.
This is definitely not new, but it is definitely not right, either. Everyone in an ALPA position should be subject to a non-compete. I'd make it 5 years minimum. This is why DPA came to be, accountability and transparency. I don't know if it will continue but it's obvious to me we need a watchdog/challenger.
Reply
  #24  
lake , 12-10-2018 05:47 PM
Gets Weekends Off
lake
Gets Weekends Off
close
  • Joined APC
    Oct 2015
  • Posts:
    270
Quote:
Originally Posted by notEnuf
This is definitely not new, but it is definitely not right, either. Everyone in an ALPA position should be subject to a non-compete. I'd make it 5 years minimum. This is why DPA came to be, accountability and transparency. I don't know if it will continue but it's obvious to me we need a watchdog/challenger.
Another reason I HATE ALPA!!
Reply
  #25  
Planetrain , 12-10-2018 05:50 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Planetrain
Gets Weekends Off
close
  • Joined APC
    Jun 2015
  • Posts:
    1,641
I like the ALPA national EA. He’s articulate, intelligent, and given many years to ALPA. If it’s true he’s gone to the company side for scope, I’m glad it’s him and not a pilot-hater lawyer. Maybe he can explain to his new bosses our positions on JVs.
Maybe he would try to make progress and get a mutually happy deal for both the company and us.
If the company didn’t want to make progress, they could have left his new position vacant.
Reply
  #26  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Bucking Bar , 12-10-2018 05:52 PM
Can't abide NAI
Bucking Bar
Can't abide NAI
close
  • Joined APC
    Jun 2007
  • Position
    Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
  • Posts:
    11,989
Quote:
Originally Posted by gzsg
Maybe if we beg we can get Tom Dilbeck back.
He prefers flying airplanes & his family. He would assist Delta pilots as asked as a volunteer but has no, zero, interest in working for the association.
Reply
  #27  
Peoloto , 12-10-2018 05:53 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Peoloto
Gets Weekends Off
close
  • Joined APC
    Sep 2015
  • Posts:
    631
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
He prefers flying airplanes & his family. He would assist Delta pilots as asked as a volunteer but has no, zero, interest in working for THIS mec.
Fixed it for you
Reply
  #28  
GivemeVSP , 12-10-2018 05:55 PM
Gets Weekends Off
GivemeVSP
Gets Weekends Off
close
  • Joined APC
    Jan 2014
  • Posts:
    228
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Don't think this is good. It would be much better if he were on our side of the table. He probably would be on our side of the table had we been able to keep our stuff together at ALPA National's BOD meeting or if we had not gotten really wild with some of our choices for Reps. There is no politically viable way for him to work for us.

Reality check, we have had 5 scope Chairmen in less than two years (assuming Brent gets replaced). We just had a negotiator resign. We lack the political stability and discipline to develop our team properly.
What’s so bad about going back to flying airplanes for a paycheck?
Reply
  #29  
gzsg , 12-10-2018 06:32 PM
Gets Weekends Off
gzsg
Gets Weekends Off
close
  • Joined APC
    Oct 2009
  • Posts:
    3,108
Quote:
Originally Posted by Planetrain
I like the ALPA national EA. He’s articulate, intelligent, and given many years to ALPA. If it’s true he’s gone to the company side for scope, I’m glad it’s him and not a pilot-hater lawyer. Maybe he can explain to his new bosses our positions on JVs.
Maybe he would try to make progress and get a mutually happy deal for both the company and us.
If the company didn’t want to make progress, they could have left his new position vacant.
Like the scope deal we have now?

Like the billions and billions and billions they wasted on RJs?

I think we can do without that.
Reply
  #30  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Bucking Bar , 12-10-2018 08:42 PM
Can't abide NAI
Bucking Bar
Can't abide NAI
close
  • Joined APC
    Jun 2007
  • Position
    Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
  • Posts:
    11,989
Quote:
Originally Posted by gzsg
Like the scope deal we have now?

Like the billions and billions and billions they wasted on RJs?

I think we can do without that.
From what I am hearing Rick Dominguez will be managing partner relationships and NOT involved in negotiations.
Reply
First
Page
3 of 11
Last
Go to
Page
1  2  3  4  5  6  7 
Page 3 of 11
Go to