Flight 4439

Subscribe
1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 
Page 5 of 13
Go to
QRH!!!

Reply
Quote: Him asking if they ran the QRH is just insulting. Does he really think that little of regional pilots now that he's at Delta? Stay off the radio.
That was a stupid question to ask them on tower frequency while they’re trying to keep the aircraft from falling out of the sky. If I’m ever in an emergency I’ll ask ATC if there’s a Delta on frequency for assistance...
Reply
Quote: The EET Training comment is factual. Every 121 carrier has been mandated to start doing the training by March of this year. A claim? Here ya go...I can assure you—and any Republic pilot reading this post who has gone through CQ this year can attest to this, Republic’s EET SIM Training module is far from “extremely basic.”
LH
The advisory circular which initiated the EET Training can be read here: https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/...-111_CHG_1.pdf

In the AC it states: Air carriers should develop training curriculums that provide
pilots with the knowledge and skills to prevent, recognize, and recover from unexpected
flightpath divergences and upset events. These training curriculums should contain the elements
and events described in Appendix 1.


Maybe Republic's approach to satisfying this requirement of the AC resulted in a training event that is "Far from 'extremely basic.'" I wouldn't know. I'm not a Republic pilot. But having participated in my airlines EET Training Event to satisfy this AC, the training was pretty damn basic, almost insulting. "You may have an ATP and thousands of hours, but here is how you recognize an approach to stall and how to recover from a stall." But, I took it for what it was, did the maneuvers and checked the box. Next!

And just because Republic's EET Training is "Far from extremely basic" it's not a judgement of your ability to fly an airplane if the safety department does an analysis of the event for internal release. Putting out a narrative of the facts of the event to the pilot group so everyone can vicariously experience the upset and learn from it, that's not a slap in the face, it's an opportunity to learn and always strive to be better tomorrow than you are today.

All in the name of safety, man.
Reply
Quote: ...If you are insulted by something like that you should take a look at yourself and make sure this job is right for you.
I'm very good in this career, thanks. And yes, last EP in the sims, I did call for the QRH
Reply
Quote: He'll probably get a pat on the back.

I found the cirrus intercept video. Maybe they are the same person.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_c...v=Q8FniOFsn7U&
I created an account just to comment on this.
You got to be kidding me. I would have never believed this without the video.

To the Cirrus guy
https://tenor.com/xlMG.gif
Reply
Quote: Insulting is a bit of a stretch. It was a high stress situation for the crew and a guy familiar with the aircraft offered help. He asked that to see where they were in the situation, not because he thought they forgot to run the qrh. If you are insulted by something like that you should take a look at yourself and make sure this job is right for you.
Offering assistance is one thing...you let the crew know you're available and then shut up until they ask for help. You let them tell you what they need instead of telling them what they need. Its their emergency, let them run it.
Too many cooks in the kitchen is dangerous
Reply
Quote: Insulting is a bit of a stretch. It was a high stress situation for the crew and a guy familiar with the aircraft offered help. He asked that to see where they were in the situation, not because he thought they forgot to run the qrh. If you are insulted by something like that you should take a look at yourself and make sure this job is right for you.
I think you have on your cute little vest on too tight there Francis.
Reply
I'm going to clear this up for everyone.

This is how you appropriately assist another aircraft in distress

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2n1bovTaek
Reply
Please tell me DL didn’t cut in and suggest the QRH?
Reply
Quote: The advisory circular which initiated the EET Training can be read here: https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/...-111_CHG_1.pdf



In the AC it states: Air carriers should develop training curriculums that provide

pilots with the knowledge and skills to prevent, recognize, and recover from unexpected

flightpath divergences and upset events. These training curriculums should contain the elements

and events described in Appendix 1.




Maybe Republic's approach to satisfying this requirement of the AC resulted in a training event that is "Far from 'extremely basic.'" I wouldn't know. I'm not a Republic pilot. But having participated in my airlines EET Training Event to satisfy this AC, the training was pretty damn basic, almost insulting. "You may have an ATP and thousands of hours, but here is how you recognize an approach to stall and how to recover from a stall." But, I took it for what it was, did the maneuvers and checked the box. Next!



And just because Republic's EET Training is "Far from extremely basic" it's not a judgement of your ability to fly an airplane if the safety department does an analysis of the event for internal release. Putting out a narrative of the facts of the event to the pilot group so everyone can vicariously experience the upset and learn from it, that's not a slap in the face, it's an opportunity to learn and always strive to be better tomorrow than you are today.



All in the name of safety, man.


I agree we should have internal memos and analysis of this event.
I assure you that no one at Republic was insulted by the EET
Reply
1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 
Page 5 of 13
Go to