Quote:
Didn’t EXACTLY say that lockdowns don’t work. It said that severe lockdowns don’t work noticeably better than less severe recommendations for social distancing. That’s an important distinction though, lost on idiots who claim “If we had only had everyone lockdown for two weeks simultaneously this would all be over by now.”Originally Posted by MIddle3rd
Oh.. How do you explain a Standford peer review study just happening to come out 2 days ago saying lock downs don't work? We got a vaccine quicker than the study. Lol. 1 week ago NY governor "finally" comes to the conclusion that they "have" to reopen? Bro, if you don't see politics involved in this, then your eyes are closed. I'm an independent for the last 20 years that is socially down the middle and fiscally right of the farthest right person you can dream of. This is as clear as the blue sky what's happening.
EVERYONE of 330 million people locking down simultaneously is statistically impossible. We couldn’t even get the small percentage of people recommending that policy to follow it themselves, far less the millions of others. It’s every bit as naive a suggestion as, “Let them eat cake...”