Ual 4933

Subscribe
7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  21 
Page 11 of 25
Go to
Quote: This is really what I'm struggling to understand.

In "whiteout" conditions, flying a visual approach, I would almost understand how you land off runway like that.
But from an ILS with low visibility?

ILS RWY 01 was OTS
Reply
Quote:
ILS RWY 01 was OTS
Was it OTS before, or was it OTS'd after the accident as is the standard procedure?

That's even more serious, because the weather was way below the minimums for the GPS RNAV 01.
Reply
Yeah looks like they OTS the ils at 1734 on the 4th
Reply
Quote: What’s the tower frequency at an uncontrolled airport again???
As I was.

Don’t believe everything you read on the internet, kids.
Reply
Think the ILS NOTAM was after the fact.
FAA routinely does that to test it for issues.
Reply
Quote: Think the ILS NOTAM was after the fact.
FAA routinely does that to test it for issues.
It was after the fact. From the NOTAM times, the airport was closed an hour before the ILS went OTS.
Reply
The ILS was not NOTAM'd OTS before the incident. And it was the only approach that was legal to shoot at that weather. I think a reasonable conclusion is, that they were shooting the ILS 01.
Reply
Quote: The ILS was not NOTAM'd OTS before the incident. And it was the only approach that was legal to shoot at that weather. I think a reasonable conclusion is, that they were shooting the ILS 01.

They were, first try was a go around.


Reply
Way off the LOC when they broke out.
Reply
Quote: Way off the LOC when they broke out.
Full deflection even slightly above mins.
Reply
7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  21 
Page 11 of 25
Go to