Search

Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Ual 4933

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-07-2019 | 10:03 AM
  #121  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,240
Likes: 67
Default

Originally Posted by sobo
I’d say in probably 5/10 of the aircraft I fly at piedmont have this issue. Some pilots prefer to fly in 195RA to tighten the system up to cat II tolerance (if that’s even a thing).
It's been a long lonnnnnnnnng time and 2 airplanes ago, so forgive me;

But if I'm not mistaken, that requires a flap 22 setting as well as an RA less than 200' to trigger all that fancy CAT2 tolerance crap? Because, if you get the CATII annunciator and put in flaps 45, it'll make that go away wont it?

Not that it matters, buuuuuuut in certain cases where flaps 45 is desirable for landing performance, etc it could be self defeating.

Like I said, 2 airplanes and years ago flying it. So if I'm wrong and off base, disregard. I'll take that, because it means I was FINALLY able to purge that 145 crap effectively
Reply
Old 03-07-2019 | 10:06 AM
  #122  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by John Carr
It's been a long lonnnnnnnnng time and 2 airplanes ago, so forgive me;

But if I'm not mistaken, that requires a flap 22 setting as well as an RA less than 200' to trigger all that fancy CAT2 tolerance crap? Because, if you get the CATII annunciator and put in flaps 45, it'll make that go away wont it?

Not that it matters, buuuuuuut in certain cases where flaps 45 is desirable for landing performance, etc it could be self defeating.

Like I said, 2 airplanes and years ago flying it. So if I'm wrong and off base, disregard. I'll take that, because it means I was FINALLY able to purge that 145 crap effectively
Not sure. Like I said, I don’t mess with it because it’s not an approved way to do anything at our company.

At any rate, I doubt that an erratic ILS could have caused this. I don’t think a trained crew would start the approach if something was acting up so severely that it caused them to land off the runway, amongst other things.

I’m not really willing to speculate too much on this whole thing. I’m gonna give the crew the benefit of the doubt on this, and wait for the NTSB to do their thing.

Glad nobody was seriously hurt.
Reply
Old 03-07-2019 | 10:30 AM
  #123  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,240
Likes: 67
Default

Originally Posted by sobo
Not sure. Like I said, I don’t mess with it because it’s not an approved way to do anything at our company.

At any rate, I doubt that an erratic ILS could have caused this. I don’t think a trained crew would start the approach if something was acting up so severely that it caused them to land off the runway, amongst other things.

I’m not really willing to speculate too much on this whole thing. I’m gonna give the crew the benefit of the doubt on this, and wait for the NTSB to do their thing.

Glad nobody was seriously hurt.
Agree, I was simply asking/wondering about that whole CATII sensitivity thinghy. Because I used to hear it all the time.

And my time on the plane, it wasnt frequent, but the whole FD/AP set up on it could suck at times. I remember being on an ILS and having the loc flip flop around.
Reply
Old 03-07-2019 | 06:29 PM
  #124  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,931
Likes: 699
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by OpMidClimax
It's an error in the receiver of the 145 localizer when exposed to module.
Exposed to what?

Maybe cell phone use in the back?
Reply
Old 03-07-2019 | 06:53 PM
  #125  
In a land of unicorns
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 7,054
Likes: 73
From: Whale FO
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Exposed to what?

Maybe cell phone use in the back?
No. Doesn't modulate like that.
Reply
Old 03-07-2019 | 07:29 PM
  #126  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 828
Likes: 0
Default

From the metar it was not hard IFR. 1500 overcast light snow. Should be able to differentiate between runway and field well before touchdown. Will be interesting to see NTSB report but this looks very bad!
Reply
Old 03-08-2019 | 02:25 AM
  #127  
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
Default

I would love to listen to the CVR
Reply
Old 03-08-2019 | 03:32 AM
  #128  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Exposed to what?

Maybe cell phone use in the back?
Moisture...
Reply
Old 03-08-2019 | 03:54 AM
  #129  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Exposed to what?

Maybe cell phone use in the back?
He meant moisture
Reply
Old 03-08-2019 | 08:40 AM
  #130  
Excargodog's Avatar
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,194
Likes: 240
Default

Originally Posted by Hou757
From the metar it was not hard IFR. 1500 overcast light snow. Should be able to differentiate between runway and field well before touchdown.
My understanding (which might well be wrong) was that the ASOS went down to 1/2 mile vis with heavier brief flurries reported on the ground. White runway surrounded by white snow with inadequate snow removal. Good runway because it's left over from a USAF base closed in the 60s, but the town itself is less than 10,000 population served because it's Essential Air Service. They have neither the personnel nor the equipment to keep a runway cleared to the extent a busier field would.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fortyeight
Republic Airways
203
09-23-2018 06:28 PM
ReserveDog
United
46
05-23-2014 07:23 AM
Airhoss
United
210
09-04-2012 06:48 AM
TruthHurts
United
49
04-04-2012 09:07 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices