Ual 4933
03-06-2019, 05:14 PM
#101
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 123
Originally Posted by dera
This is really what I'm struggling to understand.
In "whiteout" conditions, flying a visual approach, I would almost understand how you land off runway like that.
But from an ILS with low visibility?
In "whiteout" conditions, flying a visual approach, I would almost understand how you land off runway like that.
But from an ILS with low visibility?
ILS RWY 01 was OTS
03-06-2019, 05:16 PM
#102
In a land of unicorns
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Whale FO
Posts: 6,469
Originally Posted by Cirrusly
”
ILS RWY 01 was OTS
ILS RWY 01 was OTS
That's even more serious, because the weather was way below the minimums for the GPS RNAV 01.
03-06-2019, 06:02 PM
#106
Porco Rosso
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 2,522
Originally Posted by cursesRedBaron
Think the ILS NOTAM was after the fact.
FAA routinely does that to test it for issues.
FAA routinely does that to test it for issues.
03-06-2019, 06:48 PM
#108
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 1,825
Originally Posted by dera
The ILS was not NOTAM'd OTS before the incident. And it was the only approach that was legal to shoot at that weather. I think a reasonable conclusion is, that they were shooting the ILS 01.
They were, first try was a go around.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EngineOut
Regional
153
05-10-2017 10:12 AM
