Why would a pilot jump?

Subscribe
3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10 
Page 7 of 10
Go to
Quote: That story has been re-told many times, but was never true.

Inevitably a few more will come out of the woodwork with supposedly true stories that they've heard about, relatives they knew, or friend-of-a-friend accounts. They're never true.

In 2016, Like Aikins did a freefall from 25,000 into a large net complex in a one-off event, sans parachute rig or a wing suit. It was a first.


In fairness, not all of these were free falls. Ms Vulovic had the aft third of a DC-9 around her for most of her fall. Weird stuff happens in aviation. I knew one guy - an old F-4 back seater - who ejected as his AC rolled in the landing flair at Red Flag (stuck leading edge flat, high speed approach, too much asymmetric lift as the plane slowed). All the vectors cancelled out. He never got a chute but was able to walk away with just scuffs and bruises. The front seater didn’t make it.
Reply
Quote: I'm taking the liberty of assuming that it's more likely he fell out while inspecting the gear, than that he jumped intentionally.

I'm also assuming it's slightly more likely that he committed suicide than that he thought it would safer to try to freefall into a lake from 3500 than land with a missing wheel.


This is one of those times when I think it's useful to talk about this before the final comes out because others might learn to be careful when troubleshooting gear problems.

Kind of doubt the final will be conclusive anyway. The investigators will probably reach the same conclusion I did, but have no way to disprove the survivor's version.
Yeah, in a Casa 212 falling while inspecting damage is plausible. Especially with the ramp open.
Reply
Comms with ATC
...He jumped out
Reply
Because of this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merion_air_disaster
I am against flybys and/or any creative maneuvering when troubleshooting a landing gear.
No one can do a thing to change the outcome, I'd run the checklist and land the plane.
FWIW...


Quote: Best not to assume.



That door isn't very far aft, and once you get out of the seat, there's nothing between you and the door. The aircraft flies at a positive deck angle all the time; it's a downhill roll between you and the open door, without anything to grab except a bench seat on the way out. There is a left side door forward of the propeller, but the best view of the gear would be from the ramp, looking forward. One would definitely want to be wearing a harness for that. If the wheel was believed gone, perhaps by ground observation, or other, verification of the extend of damage might be appropriate.

I've had damage before involving other aircraft inspecting my exterior, and I've done the same with other aircraft when they've had damage, so it's not unreasonable, if able to throw on some goggles and look past the edge of the ramp, to do so, but certainly with appropriate precautions. Ideally a harness and tether, or if unable a parachute rig.

It's not far at all if one's off balance or tumbling, to reach that open ramp. Going out the side door is a non-starter. it's very difficult to open in flight, and is directly in front of the propeller.
Reply
Quote: ...He jumped out
Was he so distraught? Was he at the controls when the gear was damaged and had just received a verbal (your careers over here) tirade from the CA? Is there a CVR?
Reply
Quote: ...He jumped out
That's not conclusive, we already know what the CA said happened.
Reply
Quote: Because of this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merion_air_disaster
I am against flybys and/or any creative maneuvering when troubleshooting a landing gear.
No one can do a thing to change the outcome, I'd run the checklist and land the plane.
FWIW...
If one has the fuel, I'm all for doing a fly-by, or having the aircraft inspected in flight by another aircraft; as stated before; have done it, and have had it done several times.

One one occasion, had I information that a tank door was open, I'd have known I had a blown actuator, and it would have saved me a spare 20 gallons of H5606 that I poured in flightt, addressing a gear and flaps issue. On another occasion, an exterior inspection I made of another aircraft yielded a decision to land him last, due to potential loss of the runway; until an inspection was done, we didn't know what was available or the extent of the problem, and it was good information to have.

Checklists don't cover everything.

Which procedure do you suggest they run for "wheel fell of,f" or "landing gear may be partially attached or damaged?"
Reply
Quote: Because of this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merion_air_disaster
I am against flybys and/or any creative maneuvering when troubleshooting a landing gear.
No one can do a thing to change the outcome, I'd run the checklist and land the plane.
FWIW...
Tower flybys, down the centerline, are fine. That's a normal-ish maneuver.

Ad hoc inflight inspections by other random aircraft are definitely not OK. You need to do some planning and coordination for formation flying of any sort, and participants need to be trained.

Exception for mil, since they do form flying as a matter of course.
Reply
Quote: Tower flybys, down the centerline, are fine. That's a normal-ish maneuver.

Ad hoc inflight inspections by other random aircraft are definitely not OK. You need to do some planning and coordination for formation flying of any sort, and participants need to be trained.

Exception for mil, since they do form flying as a matter of course.
No kidding. Unplanned formation - especially by dissimilar aircraft - is significantly hazardous. And yeah, most ex military will pull it off nicely, assuming the target aircraft flies straight and level, but it’s dicier than most people suspect.
Reply
Quote: If one has the fuel, I'm all for doing a fly-by, ... I had a blown actuator, and it would have saved me a spare 20 gallons of H5606 that I poured in flightt, addressing a gear and flaps issue...
...
Checklists don't cover everything.
...
I agree with all that, maybe my shortcoming was to consider the event only under the light of my general aviation roots.
Probably it was better said by Rick:

Quote: Ad hoc inflight inspections by other random aircraft are definitely not OK.
No, no, no, no, no, no...
I don't want to improvise formation flight with an unknown pilot and different aircraft types for what?
No inspection will fix anything (again, simple GA aircraft) that will influence the outcome.
Reply
3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10 
Page 7 of 10
Go to