Quote:
Originally Posted by Imapilot2
I hear you and do understand that frustration but sometimes, more often than not with pilots and other large groups, its better to have a few good men do their best for us. I see it the same as this: After a 2hr delay on the ground in LGA you are faced with going back to the gate or in 15 min you feel you are going to be able to take off. Now get out of your seat, go to the back and ask all the passengers over the PA hands up if they want to go back to the gate ,hands down if they want to wait to take the chance to go. Everyone will argue to the other side that they don't understand their reasons well enough. Those that have to go want to take the chance, others will miss connect anyway so they want to go back. It will start a war that will never end.
Sometimes all the info in the room with the negotiators is so deep that the regular line guy will never grasp or even care to understand. So an honest "informed" vote never happens even if we MEMRAT it. I don't think their is a conspiracy for us to be left out. There are many people involved working for us. I also don't think that over time any other group/union working for us is going to be any different. Soak anything for a long time and it all comes out smelling the same. This of course is JMO.
I respectfully disagree with your perception of this. There is a general distrust/dissatisfaction of how our union leadership conducts business. Do live feed MEC meetings every third Thursday of the month with some time for Q and A at the end (similar to investor calls) as an example of how to really get people involved. I think you might be surprised how many people would sign up. Bringing people into the process in a format that can easily be attended (not flying/driving somewhere) could be a huge boon to pilots feeling like they are part of the program...the so called "unity" would get a huge shot in the arm.
The notion that we need a handful of guys thinking for us because we are too dumb or lazy to understand is at the heart of why people dislike this union leadership. It needs to stop. Additionally, getting the participation rate higher, then conducting a vote that has 90% plus behind the cause really amps up our message to management. The other ways (ie C2012 and this latest TA), not so much. Guys have been asking for the things mentioned above for a long time. The union is impervious to change. Why? Control.