Mike Enzi's attempts to repeal the ATP Law

Subscribe
1  2  3  4  5  6  7 
Page 3 of 9
Go to
Quote: So, they're anti-regulation. But ... pro-subsidy.
Shack. Let's drink beer. Filler if necessary.
Reply
Quote: Riiiiiight because we need another reason to keep Great Mistakes alive.
Great mistakes will fold in 3 months if they are lucky. Where have you been
Reply
What Sen. Enzi is missing, as well as the FAA, is that Great Lakes has already effectively repealed the 1500 hour rule.. by operating under the part 135 certificate, Lakes should be able to hire all the pilots they could want. Lakes should not see a degration of service because of the 1500 hour rule because the 1500 hour rule no longer applies to them or their Riverton service. So maybe, just maybe, Enzi should stick to real republican values and stand by the economic laws of capitalism.

I'm all for if they want to redefine the number of enplanements to keep funding or service at airports that need them, but to pressure the FAA to reevaluate its 1500 hour rule, for lakes, which is part 135, is udder insanity. Lakes is actually living proof that even if we eliminated the 1500 hour rule, we'd hire a small handful of 500-1499hr guys and then in a year we'd be right back where we are today.

Lakes isn't suffering some mythical pilot shortage because the FAA is cutting off their source of labor, lakes is suffering because there are so few young people who desire the job of being an airline pilot anymore. Lakes is an example of a repealed 1500 hour rule that still won't save the industry. Until the job becomes desireable again, Lakes and other regionals will continue to suffer staffing issues. This is basic supply-demand, the part 135 exemption that lakes got, and its continued abysmal service record, only shows that this republican should stand by supply-demand economics. This, believe it or not, isn't the governments fault.
Reply
I thought it was incredible they got the FAA to sign off on the 135 exemption. Goes to show how flexible the FAA can be with airlines when they want to be.
Reply
Quote: I thought it was incredible they got the FAA to sign off on the 135 exemption. Goes to show how flexible the FAA can be with airlines when they want to be.
Agreed.. I just find it funny a senator would still demand they "reevaluate" the 1500 hour rule for an airline it doesn't apply to anyway..
Reply
Quote: Agreed.. I just find it funny a senator would still demand they "reevaluate" the 1500 hour rule for an airline it doesn't apply to anyway..
Lakes has 25 captains and are losing 7 a month to other airlines. They are still flying 121. 135 only applies to fo's. I have a friend there hoping he makes it to 1500 before they fold. He's at 1300 now...Lakes is circling the drain. If they pull out of their predicament i will be in shock.
Reply
Quote: Once you legislate a handout, good luck ever taking it away. Have you ever tried to take a bottle from a dependent hungry infant? They scream bloody murder until they get it back. Voting adults who are the beneficiary of handouts they've come to rely on are no different. Only difference is the adults are capable of finding an alternate solution...kind of.
Republicans as hungry infants addicted to handouts.
Well played, FaceBiten, well played.....
Reply
Quote: Republicans as hungry infants addicted to handouts.
Well played, FaceBiten, well played.....
I think republicans is the wrong word there.
Reply
Essential Air Service

My favorite oxymoron.
Reply
EAS=Welfare air. Some that receive the EAS then turn around and use the subsidy to unfairly lower prices on the competitive non EAS routes. Operators that get a large percentage of revenue from it, would not last long if it went away. Gotta love Crony capitalism....
Reply
1  2  3  4  5  6  7 
Page 3 of 9
Go to