Search
Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

UAL and Jumpseats

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-17-2019, 08:49 PM
  #491  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: UNA
Posts: 4,423
Default

Originally Posted by amcnd View Post
OO/RP =65% of all UAX departures...
this makes sense. 65% of total UAL departures does not
Gone Flying is offline  
Old 10-17-2019, 09:20 PM
  #492  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Turbosina's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: Guppy Gear Slinger
Posts: 1,857
Default

Originally Posted by Gone Flying View Post
as an OO pilot i really hope this is not true. Non rev bennies are NOT supposed to be in jealousy here. I can see the JS, but ABSOLUTELY no excuse for denying a non rev or zed fare for any reason you would not deny a paying passenger.
Yeah, I mean, how does a CA deny a non-rev for any reason other than 'the guy's intoxicated/ a safety hazard'?!? I hope this isn't true, but if it is, that CA needs some serious education.
Turbosina is offline  
Old 10-17-2019, 09:50 PM
  #493  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Posts: 471
Default

Originally Posted by Turbosina View Post
Yeah, I mean, how does a CA deny a non-rev for any reason other than 'the guy's intoxicated/ a safety hazard'?!? I hope this isn't true, but if it is, that CA needs some serious education.
We also have multiple reports of Skywest captains instructing gate agents to not clear UAL and UAL ‘exclusive’ Jumpseaters at the gate. So basically you have captains unwilling to own their view point and thus dumping it on gate agents. Sorry not a good look at all SAPA. Not surprising at all btw...
JurgenKlopp is offline  
Old 10-18-2019, 02:46 AM
  #494  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 527
Default

Originally Posted by mcat View Post
Unfortunately it’s true. Heard it from the pilot right after it happened...Gate agent called someone on the other end of the jetbridge, that person told the CA an Air Wisconsin non rev Pilot wants on, and he said no.
If that's what happened, sounds like the details got changed through a literal "game of telephone" and a nonrev became a jumpseater by the time the story reached the CA
vessbot is offline  
Old 10-18-2019, 03:14 AM
  #495  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: 737 Cap
Posts: 451
Default

Originally Posted by ConnectionPilot View Post
Domestic lift, yes, total lift no. SkyWest has 1000 of United’s domestic departures per day which I believe is 2500 total. Republic is around 400.
Again, we aren’t talking the same language. Departures are only part of the equation. ASM is the industry accepted metric. The current ratio of mainline domestic to express domestic ASM is roughly 4 to 1. Meaning if Skywest and Republic are doing 65% of the express flying (no idea if correct but seems reasonable?), then they’re providing approx 16% of the domestic ASM. Not insignificant by any means and definitely a critical part of the United business model.

On the jumpseat issue at hand, I believe a more reasoned response would have been to lump UAL pilots into the OAL bucket wrt jumpseat priority until a mutually agreed upon solution could be completed. I understand both arguments thoroughly so there is no need to rehash them here.

I also believe that weaponizing a safety document like an FOM sets an incredibly bad precedent. I can’t imagine that any POI is going to look positively on a flight ops team and leadership team that is willing to do so.
Scott Stoops is offline  
Old 10-18-2019, 03:28 AM
  #496  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2018
Posts: 31
Default

https://www.captiongenerator.com/154...ttfWFfpaI0I2I8
willd is offline  
Old 10-18-2019, 03:41 AM
  #497  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 65
Default

Originally Posted by Scott Stoops View Post
Again, we aren’t talking the same language. Departures are only part of the equation. ASM is the industry accepted metric. The current ratio of mainline domestic to express domestic ASM is roughly 4 to 1. Meaning if Skywest and Republic are doing 65% of the express flying (no idea if correct but seems reasonable?), then they’re providing approx 16% of the domestic ASM. Not insignificant by any means and definitely a critical part of the United business model.

On the jumpseat issue at hand, I believe a more reasoned response would have been to lump UAL pilots into the OAL bucket wrt jumpseat priority until a mutually agreed upon solution could be completed. I understand both arguments thoroughly so there is no need to rehash them here.

I also believe that weaponizing a safety document like an FOM sets an incredibly bad precedent. I can’t imagine that any POI is going to look positively on a flight ops team and leadership team that is willing to do so.
A more reasoned response would have been to not act like a bunch of punks. Weaponizing the JS is wrong on so many levels. Too late to put the genie back in that bottle. Really stupid decision making. Negotiations are always a better alternative.
Inkoreausa is offline  
Old 10-18-2019, 05:16 AM
  #498  
Line Holder
 
thaddiusMbuggs's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 59
Default

Originally Posted by mcat View Post
Unfortunately it’s true. Heard it from the pilot right after it happened...Gate agent called someone on the other end of the jetbridge, that person told the CA an Air Wisconsin non rev Pilot wants on, and he said no.
That sounds extremely unusual. I’ve had them do that numerous times only when a JS wants on. Never once heard of an agent calling down for a non rev wanting a seat, not saying it didn’t happen but I find it hard to believe...I’d take a wager that the words were more along the lines of if they could take the jump seater up front. Which for the record, I still believe they should have taken him of course.
thaddiusMbuggs is offline  
Old 10-18-2019, 05:24 AM
  #499  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 524
Default

Originally Posted by Gone Flying View Post
excited is the last word i would use. a ZW guy/gal did not make it home and an OO pilot overstepped (no offense but im going to caveat "assuming this is true") but yes i believe this could happen given the size of our pilot group and the emotions that are at play
The ZW guy in question wasn’t able to see his kids thanks to the petty crap this OO CA pulled. He was in fact listed as a non-rev, because he had gotten denied for the j/s. Real classy.
RabidW0mbat is offline  
Old 10-18-2019, 05:43 AM
  #500  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2019
Posts: 344
Default

Pretty good, but the FA should have been saying to the other one, "I'm sure we can find a United Pilot looking for his third ex-wife"
herewego is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LeeMat
United
131
07-11-2014 06:44 PM
flybywire44
Major
31
01-08-2014 01:20 PM
flyths1
Major
5
08-11-2008 04:15 PM
WatchThis!
Regional
63
07-11-2008 09:52 AM
Airhoss
Major
1
07-09-2008 06:10 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices