Skywest
07-15-2014 | 09:22 AM
#5841
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,300
Likes: 0
From: Seat 0B
More than 100 E175s, you know how it goes, the official word on where and when will probably come out sometime down the line.
07-15-2014 | 10:29 AM
#5842
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,301
Likes: 2
From "UTC's" prospective, they would need to know a firm number so they can plan there budget/MX personal in place..A loose 100 or so number is bad business form...
07-15-2014 | 11:44 AM
#5843
Banned
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevets
Just as a point of information, it was not I who started a union discussion. I simply responded to someone who claimed the IAH UAL flying as their flying being taken by XJT, a company I currently work for. And I do believe that the TOS does allow any of these types of discussions on any thread. And if you are never interested in reading my posts, the forum allows a way of accommodating that, as some have done.
1. Union discussions are restricted to the union forum...that's why it was created. Unions have all the same issues as politics...thread trajectory is always predictable and never good.
2. We can keep threads "on track", and do so all the time. It is entirely appropriate to start a SKW/Surejet integration/whipsaw thread and you're probably the right guy to do it. But this is not that thread.
As a MOD, I obviously can't opt out on specific users.
Originally Posted by Nevets
Just as a point of information, it was not I who started a union discussion. I simply responded to someone who claimed the IAH UAL flying as their flying being taken by XJT, a company I currently work for. And I do believe that the TOS does allow any of these types of discussions on any thread. And if you are never interested in reading my posts, the forum allows a way of accommodating that, as some have done.
1. Union discussions are restricted to the union forum...that's why it was created. Unions have all the same issues as politics...thread trajectory is always predictable and never good.
2. We can keep threads "on track", and do so all the time. It is entirely appropriate to start a SKW/Surejet integration/whipsaw thread and you're probably the right guy to do it. But this is not that thread.
As a MOD, I obviously can't opt out on specific users.
07-15-2014 | 11:46 AM
#5844
Prime Minister/Moderator
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,906
Likes: 692
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
07-15-2014 | 01:17 PM
#5846
Banned
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Ok, but I don't think you understand what I'm saying. If we are not allowed to say ANYTHING about ANY union on ANY thread about Skywest that is in the Regional forums, and someone asks me a union question on said thread, then it's not me hijacking it. Anyway, I think it's ridiculous to ban ANY union conversation on a thread about the largest part 121 airline that is non-union. Go ahead and ban me from APC indefinitely if you want. I do not care.
07-15-2014 | 01:21 PM
#5847
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
From: 206
When was the last ALPA card drive at skywest?
07-15-2014 | 03:16 PM
#5848
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Ok, but I don't think you understand what I'm saying. If we are not allowed to say ANYTHING about ANY union on ANY thread about Skywest that is in the Regional forums, and someone asks me a union question on said thread, then it's not me hijacking it. Anyway, I think it's ridiculous to ban ANY union conversation on a thread about the largest part 121 airline that is non-union. Go ahead and ban me from APC indefinitely if you want. I do not care.
07-15-2014 | 04:11 PM
#5850
Banned
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevets
Ok, but I don't think you understand what I'm saying. If we are not allowed to say ANYTHING about ANY union on ANY thread about Skywest that is in the Regional forums, and someone asks me a union question on said thread, then it's not me hijacking it. Anyway, I think it's ridiculous to ban ANY union conversation on a thread about the largest part 121 airline that is non-union. Go ahead and ban me from APC indefinitely if you want. I do not care.
+1!!! Can we get on this, please?
Originally Posted by Nevets
Ok, but I don't think you understand what I'm saying. If we are not allowed to say ANYTHING about ANY union on ANY thread about Skywest that is in the Regional forums, and someone asks me a union question on said thread, then it's not me hijacking it. Anyway, I think it's ridiculous to ban ANY union conversation on a thread about the largest part 121 airline that is non-union. Go ahead and ban me from APC indefinitely if you want. I do not care.
+1!!! Can we get on this, please?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
