Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   SkyWest (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/skywest/)
-   -   Skywest v2.0 (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/skywest/93589-skywest-v2-0-a.html)

Nevjets 12-03-2017 11:29 AM

Skywest v2.0
 

Originally Posted by Jonneaux (Post 2476703)
Apparently not as new hire classes are still full and we had a net gain of fifty pilots to the seniority list.



If they see a trend in declining hiring numbers and an increasing exodus of FOs they will be back to the bargaining table long before 2022.


You should have signed a 20 year contract then, if it doesn’t make a difference. Is this like the last pay deal that allows management to unilaterally increase first year pay as well?

Five year deals nowadays is just giving away leverage.

amcnd 12-03-2017 12:41 PM

We have been netting 50 a month. 45 new aircraft is ruff math 600 pilots needed. Were over staffed on the ERJ to begin with. So OO will be nust fine the next year.. after that the Demand at the Majors starts to spike and things will get interesting..

gainzbruh 12-03-2017 12:55 PM


Originally Posted by gojo (Post 2476786)
It’s not like SkyWest is the only one taxing, or the only airline in the sky. I shake my head every time I hear ATC say, SkyWest 1234, say speed. Uh, 250 knots. Can you go faster? Sure, what do you need? Is dispatch filling your TAS that slow? Maybe, the answer is to get a contract that pays block or scheduled whichever is greater like most other airlines, and fly normal


how about.....no? we're doing just fine over here. watch and see, hopefully you learn quick.

WesternSkies 12-03-2017 01:21 PM

I don’t see the issue with credit or better. It’s actually genius to align incentives between all three groups.
Last month I was awarded “x” block. Looking back I flew “x” block.
I was awarded “x” + 10% for credit.
Looking back I was paid “x” + 14%. I was paid for every hour I flew + 14%, I think we have bigger other items to spend bargaining capital on.

Our customers track fuel consumption very closely and our executing the block saves them $. They don’t want early and they don’t want late.

EFBprobs 12-03-2017 06:12 PM


Originally Posted by gojo (Post 2476781)
First of all, while SAPA presented that despicable pay package, you all didn’t have to accept it. This day and age, with the pay trending up the way it is why would you lock yourself into a 5 year deal for the promise of growth that you know SkyWest would do anyway based on their long history.

Thank you! Trust me, 44% of the pilots here agree with you. The mentality of some of the guys at this airline is hilarious. I had a guy tell me, "you should stop asking for more and more all the time. We should be thankful to have a job in the first place and that it's better than it's ever been at Skywest right now." The kool aid is strong here.

EFBprobs 12-03-2017 06:15 PM


Originally Posted by gainzbruh (Post 2476857)
how about.....no? we're doing just fine over here. watch and see, hopefully you learn quick.

This is the mentality I'm talking about. We have no commuter hotels, no commuter parking, no retention bonuses, no overtime for 85+ hours, no per diem protection for displacement, no guaranteed interview, no flow, no real representation......so what do we have? West coast bases and a turkey coupon. Yea, we're doing just fine.

Nevjets 12-03-2017 07:02 PM

Skywest v2.0
 

Originally Posted by WesternSkies (Post 2476873)
I don’t see the issue with credit or better. It’s actually genius to align incentives between all three groups.

Last month I was awarded “x” block. Looking back I flew “x” block.

I was awarded “x” + 10% for credit.

Looking back I was paid “x” + 14%. I was paid for every hour I flew + 14%, I think we have bigger other items to spend bargaining capital on.



Our customers track fuel consumption very closely and our executing the block saves them $. They don’t want early and they don’t want late.


Not that I necessarily agree with your premise to begin with but how is having block or better not aligning incentives? The only people that historical block hurt is the crew.

gainzbruh 12-03-2017 07:22 PM


Originally Posted by EFBprobs (Post 2476976)
This is the mentality I'm talking about. We have no commuter hotels, no commuter parking, no retention bonuses, no overtime for 85+ hours, no per diem protection for displacement, no guaranteed interview, no flow, no real representation......so what do we have? West coast bases and a turkey coupon. Yea, we're doing just fine.

You do you boo! I'll be over here doing my thing

And the last guy touched on why we fly slow, no reason to touch on that. If someone wants to be the guy who flys as fast as possible just to get to a busy airport early and your gate is occupied and sit there for 45 minutes go right ahead.

word302 12-03-2017 08:34 PM


Originally Posted by WesternSkies (Post 2476873)
I don’t see the issue with credit or better. It’s actually genius to align incentives between all three groups.
Last month I was awarded “x” block. Looking back I flew “x” block.
I was awarded “x” + 10% for credit.
Looking back I was paid “x” + 14%. I was paid for every hour I flew + 14%, I think we have bigger other items to spend bargaining capital on.

Our customers track fuel consumption very closely and our executing the block saves them $. They don’t want early and they don’t want late.

Nope. You don’t get it.

WesternSkies 12-03-2017 10:31 PM

I do. I do get it.
I “missed” out on .38% of pay last month because of “credit or better” instead of “block or better”
Yet I was paid 14% more than I blocked.
.38% is a very small price to pay to know that 4,500 pilots are out there rowing this airline in the same direction.

Careful what you wish for.
We’ve all been in plenty of OAL J/S to know we don’t want that fuel wasting at a contract airline.
Incentive.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:24 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands