Search

Notices

MAX mitigation?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-18-2019 | 12:24 PM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by dawgdriver
I'm not sure I follow your logic or your need for a cryptic response. Those deferred newhire classes would've been just getting on line in December, Just in time for those 19 -700s. Per your statement, SW will be down 60 aircraft, wouldn't having 19 airframes be a good thing? No one knows how much longer this will go on
There’s nothing cryptic about it. SWA is overmanned now. Overmanned before the MAX was grounded. They’d be overmanned with 19 more planes. The MAX may be back within a month or so of those 19 planes entering service anyway. Not buying those planes has nothing to do with not having a growth agenda. You don’t even know the details of where those planes are coming from or whether SWA tried to get them.

Stop the pointless speculation and find a better hobby.
Reply
Old 07-18-2019 | 01:10 PM
  #32  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: 737, ALL of the seats
Default

Originally Posted by Peacock
There’s nothing cryptic about it. SWA is overmanned now. Overmanned before the MAX was grounded. They’d be overmanned with 19 more planes. The MAX may be back within a month or so of those 19 planes entering service anyway. Not buying those planes has nothing to do with not having a growth agenda. You don’t even know the details of where those planes are coming from or whether SWA tried to get them.

Stop the pointless speculation and find a better hobby.
https://m.imgur.com/gallery/c4jt321

There’s nothing wrong! Everything is fine!
😰
Reply
Old 07-18-2019 | 01:12 PM
  #33  
Thread Starter
Swimmin' in da pool
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Peacock
There’s nothing cryptic about it....Stop the pointless speculation and find a better hobby.
"Pointless speculation...Find a better hobby"?

Again with the hobby! "Dammit, that's twice!" (Cheesy Top Gun ATC guy)

Nope, you're right, nothing cryptic.

Just curious, as you're on here too, shouldn't you "find a better hobby" or were you anointed official hall monitor?

FYI, the purpose of a forum is the open exchange of thoughts and ideas. Labelling inputs you disagree with as 'pointless speculation' and dispatching people to "find a better hobby"(x2) isn't exactly in the spirit of open dialogue. Why so defensive? Relax Peacock, your airline will not be harmed by pointless speculation. Your argument, while still difficult to follow, is one you're entitled to and we can agree to disagree . I'll work on finding a better hobby; perhaps can you work on your anger.

Peace.

Last edited by dawgdriver; 07-18-2019 at 01:54 PM.
Reply
Old 07-18-2019 | 01:34 PM
  #34  
ZapBrannigan's Avatar
Furloughed Again?!
15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,948
Likes: 109
From: Boeing 737
Default

I’ll bite, I want to know that the folks in charge have a plan too.

I’d like to believe they have a short term plan to continue to grow the enterprise during the Max grounding. I’d like to believe they have a plan B in the event the Max never comes back. I’d like to believe that we will be appropriately manned if/when the Max returns to service. I hope that none of these plans include a merger or acquisition.

I don’t think it’s unreasonable to discuss what the plan is. Right now we are dead in the water, unable to grow and unable to continue fleet replacement.

Just because he doesn’t work for WN, doesn’t make his thoughts on the topic any less valid. I am a lifelong avgeek long before being an avgeek was cool and I have engaged in similar discussions about dozens of airlines that I’ve never worked for.

These are questions worth asking whether you work at WN or not.
Reply
Old 07-18-2019 | 01:51 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by dawgdriver
"Pointless speculation...Find a better hobby"?

Again with the hobby! "Dammit, that's twice!" (Cheesy Top Gun ATC guy)

Nope, you're right, nothing cryptic.

Just curious, as you're on here too, shouldn't you "find a better hobby" or were you anointed official hall monitor?

FYI, the purpose of a forum is the open exchange of thoughts and ideas. Labelling inputs you disagree with as 'pointless speculation' and dispatching people to "find a better hobby"(x2) isn't exactly in the spirit of open dialogue. Why so defensive? Relax Peacock, your airline will not be harmed by anything written here. Your argument, while still difficult to follow, is one you're entitled to and we can agree to disagree . I'll work on finding a better hobby; perhaps can you work on your anger.

Peace.
No anger here. If you can’t decipher the plain writing, there’s nothing I can do for you.
Reply
Old 07-18-2019 | 01:54 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,544
Likes: 0
From: 175 CA
Default

We are overmanned and have been for a while....now for two big IFs, we can scoop up a bunch of maxes and if the public wants to fly it we can expand really fast by being overstaffed now. I think company will play it safe and not go too all in for cheap Max’s , I think they will get compensated either through a cheaper deal in the future or a bigger airframe.

GK being conservative I think would look into at least getting another fleet program up and running even if we don’t follow through with a purchase, that way if it’s further delayed or public really doesn’t forget we can recover, it will have another benefit of putting Boeing on notice. Whatever we save with single fleet type takes a massive cut when something like this happens, and this isn’t the first time 737 has been grounded for a while.

How long to get Airbus program up and running? I know we will fly it like a 300 but we can surely do it in less than a year.
Reply
Old 07-18-2019 | 02:10 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ZapBrannigan

Just because he doesn’t work for WN, doesn’t make his thoughts on the topic any less valid. I am a lifelong avgeek long before being an avgeek was cool and I have engaged in similar discussions about dozens of airlines that I’ve never worked for.

These are questions worth asking whether you work at WN or not.
Spot on fellow avgeek. We're all in this together, just the hired help. Any one of us could easily be on the street, working elsewhere. Seemed straightforward enough to me, not sure what the fuss is about.
Reply
Old 07-18-2019 | 03:42 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Peacock
SWA is overmanned now. Overmanned before the MAX was grounded. They’d be overmanned with 19 more planes. The MAX may be back within a month or so of those 19 planes entering service anyway. Not buying those planes has nothing to do with not having a growth agenda.
Too many pilots, not enough planes, expensive, but no growth. No one knows when the Max will come back or how.
Reply
Old 07-18-2019 | 04:10 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 4,553
Likes: 397
Default

The sky is not falling.
Everyone here seems to have a lot of permanent solutions to a temporary problem.
The max will fly again.
Southwest will survive and prosper through this.
An economic slowdown or another hull loss scares me a lot more than this temporary crisis.
Reply
Old 07-18-2019 | 04:26 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by e6bpilot
The sky is not falling.
Everyone here seems to have a lot of permanent solutions to a temporary problem.
The max will fly again.
Southwest will survive and prosper through this.
An economic slowdown or another hull loss scares me a lot more than this temporary crisis.
So would most agree that SWA isn't going anywhere? Dual meaning intended.

I kid, I kid!

Great company, great peeps.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Singlecoil
Safety
12
11-13-2018 07:08 PM
Raptor
FedEx
132
07-20-2016 05:08 PM
MikeF16
Delta
10
04-24-2016 11:21 AM
ttkcs1998
Safety
3
11-25-2014 11:00 PM
Sluggo_63
Cargo
14
07-19-2012 06:09 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices